Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My!

They’re out there. I’ve helped stand up carriers recently that sell them and have also bought such service from other carriers. At least for 100G. I haven’t seen 400G Ethernet point to point services but also have not been asked to engineer to sell them either so I suspect that demand is eithe

ACX7100 Woes - Operator Outreach -

In attempting to operationalize the ACX7100 I have run into quite a few challenges with the platform once I stray outside of traditional routing and switching. The EVPN instances seem to have quite a few caveats and things like CFM and RFC2544 traffic generation. Many of the show commands don't s

Re: ICANN

To the OP… I hear ICANN also has a no trolls policy. I’m sure you can find that if you look hard enough. Your best bet is to go find the nearest bridge.l and hang out under it. Don’t worry - they’ll find you. Ed PS - normally I too have a no trolls policy but I couldn’t resist. _

Re: 100GbE beyond 40km

I just bite the bullet and use 3rd party optics. It’s easier and once you make the switch, lower cost. Ed Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 25, 2021, at 12:29 AM, Joe Freeman wrote: > >  > Open Line Systems can get you to 80K with a 100G DWDM Optic (PAM4) - > > I've used a lot of SmartOptics

Re: Juniper vMX evaluation - how?

I downloaded it in the past and can¹t remember having any issues downloading itŠ Getting it to work in my environment was a bit more challenging, however. I do have a Juniper login which is required. I also just verified that I can download application package: vMX

Re: Cable Operator List

Hi Colton, For what it sounds like you’re really looking for, a remote MAC-PHY (or pre remote MAC-PHY, ala mini CMTS) would probably be the good fit for your application. This is certainly not an endorsement, as we haven’t used any remote MAC-PHY devices today. There are a couple players pouring

Re: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real?

Yeah, so not a Bright House Networks email administrator but I am affiliated with Bright House Networks. I have forwarded the thread to our email administration team. Cheers! Ed >On 8/2/15, 3:53 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Jay Ashworth" > wrote: > >>I think the body text of the message should ident

Re: Voip encryption

Hi Simon, My understanding is that since your 3rd party VPLS instance is a private ³MPLS² network, there is no requirement for application-level encryption. However if you wanted to encrypt VOIP that carries credit card data, some PBX/handsets offer application-level media encryption if that¹s the