Yeah, so not a Bright House Networks email administrator but I am affiliated with Bright House Networks. I have forwarded the thread to our email administration team.
Cheers! Ed >On 8/2/15, 3:53 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Jay Ashworth" ><nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of j...@baylink.com> wrote: > >>I think the body text of the message should identify it as coming from >>the Bright House email system? I think it should be written in standard >>USAdian English, which that is decidedly not. >> >>Or perhaps the problem is that that subject line was supposed to be >>parameterized, and the number of bytes is missing for some reason. But in >>any event that is a common message to spoof, and the more bits of >>identity that are in it the harder it is to do so. That message format >>has almost zero bit of provider-identifiable data. >> >>""" >>Your Bright House Networks IMAP email storage for u...@domain.com is at >>490MB, approaching your quota of 500MB. >> >>IMAP email permits you to access all your mail folders by storing them on >>the mail server, but because of this, all mail in your folders >>contributes to your storage limit. >> >>You can delete messages to reduce your storage, or move them to your PC. >>If you delete them, or have already deleted them, you usually must >>'compact' each folder to reclaim the extra space. >> >>Alternatively, you can contact Customer Care to see about having your >>quota increased. >>""" >> >>Cheers, >>-- jra >> >>On August 2, 2015 3:44:35 PM EDT, Frank Bulk <frnk...@iname.com> wrote: >>>What do you think their message should say? We struggled over this, >>>too, and settled on some soft language, included information on how to >>>purchase more storage, and also provided our email address and phone >>>numbers. >>> >>>Frank >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jay Ashworth >>>Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:55 PM >>>To: nanog@nanog.org >>>Subject: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? >>> >>>Any brighthouse email admins on the list? My sister got the following >>>high water warning message, with the included headers which, since they >>>appear to include no Received: headers, look like they actually came >>>from brighthouse's email cluster. >>> >>>If this is a real Bright House warning message, somebody should be >>>flogged. Teaching people which messages is to believe is hard enough... >>> >>>Cheers, >>>-- jra >>> >>> >>>-------- Original Message -------- >>>Subject: Re: Fwd: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the >>>mailbox! >>> >>>I lied. The header to yours - which I finally found - is nice and long. >>> the header on this one is >>> >>>Return-Path: <> >>>From: admin >>>Subject: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the mailbox! >>>Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 06:22:44 +0000 >>>Message-ID: e31468ce-38de-11e5-b0a6-17507733086b >>> >>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>From: admin >>>>>Sent: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 2:22 AM >>>>>Subject: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the >>>>mailbox! >>>>> >>>>>Your mailbox is over the high water mark. >>>>>Please delete some messages from your mailbox. >>>-- >>>Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> >>-- >>Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >
