I have no horse in this race, however one need only look at the NYIIX
outages list to see how well the Brocade/Extreme SLX platform works on
at-scale service provider networks...
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:55 PM Blake Hudson wrote:
>
>
> Chris Welti wrote on 11/1/2018 10:03 AM:
> > Nicolas Fevrier
I think a fresh conversation is needed around what makes up a
"minimally viable" feature set for an IXP:
The days of an IXP "needing" to engineer and support a multi-tenant
sFlow portal, because the only other option is shelling out the big
bucks for Arbor, have long passed -- overlooking the plet
I believe this isn't the actual process, however recent reorganization
has brought with it a new tier of "entry level" order/service
management that's not fully up to speed on things.
You'll want to ask your account team for a dedicated project manager
to help with the process.
HTH,
-a
On Fri, J
I think tunnelbroker.net is an great community service, and a
significant factor in global IPv6 adoption. For one, it's allowed me
to experiment with v6 from my home ~5 miles from NYC, where there are
still no options for native connectivity. Hats off to Mike and the
entire HE team for maintainin
Hey!
New message, please read <http://nlp2.onnet.edu.vn/everybody.php?5u>
Adam Rothschild
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hey!
New message, please read <http://ankitstudygroup.com/former.php?5f>
Adam Rothschild
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
An additional advantage for Frontier customers, post acquisition:
http://ipadmin.frontier.com/bilateralpeering_policy.pdf
http://www.verizonenterprise.com/terms/peering/
$0.02,
-a
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Black
> w
r example.
>
>
> Again, the key may be that there will be ambiguity that may only be sorted
> out as case law develops around each of these areas. But IANAL so I¹m just
> guessing like the rest of us for now! ;-)
>
> - Jason
>
> On 2/27/15, 3:44 PM, "Adam Rothschild"
I interpreted the FCC press release[*] to apply these provisions to
"broadband access" providers only -- that is to say, not hosters, nor
CDNs. It will indeed be interesting to see how this works once the
full documentation is released.
FWIW,
-a
[*]
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Dail
Provided without commentary, in case this impacts some operations:
https://www.facebook.com/Tinetworkers/
https://twitter.com/TinetStrike/with_replies
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
[...]
> Interestingly enough, it seems Apple primarily used it's own, new, CDN for
> the iOS 8 release:
>
> http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/09/18/apple-chose-to-handle-ios-8-rollout-with-own-content-delivery-network
I noticed same. Mor
look to the
Tata situation (congested for multiple years), which was a textbook case of
poor execution and damage control by all involved, as a recent example. Fool
me once...
On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Livingood, Jason
wrote:
> On 7/23/14, 1:18 PM, "Adam Rothschild" wrote:
>
nd Verizon’s customers?
>
> -P
>
> On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Adam Rothschild wrote:
>
>> I think the confusion by Jay and others is that there is a plethora of
>> commercial options available for sending traffic to Comcast or Verizon, at
>> scale and absent conge
I think the confusion by Jay and others is that there is a plethora of
commercial options available for sending traffic to Comcast or Verizon, at
scale and absent congestion. I contend that there is not.
I, too, have found Netflix highly responsive and professional, as a peering
partner...
$0
How is this considered even remotely relevant to the NANOG list?
VoiceOps, I can sort of see...
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Tim Donahue"
>
>> We ported this to an underlying carrier (the guilty party shall remain
>> nameless), an
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>> I've heard of folk in and around the NYC metro getting set up for v6
>> by escalating through their commercial account teams, or the field
>
> 'commercial account teams' == business customers?
Sorry, yes, that is correct: one way to ge
I've heard of folk in and around the NYC metro getting set up for v6
by escalating through their commercial account teams, or the field
service managers who went out to their homes to supervise their
early-adopter [X]GPON ONT installations. This isn't to say the
process was particularly easy or fu
Constantine,
I'm afraid you might be confusing the NANOG list with
supp...@linode.com (which, incidentally, I've found to be good at
providing timely assistance, more often than not).
In any event, I've found that commercial GeoIP services rely on data
from RIRs and the global routing table a bit
http://www.voxel.net offers web-orderable servers and VMs, with BGP
support (IPv4 and IPv6) available as a paid add-on in all service
locations.
I'm honestly surprised we don't see this supported by more folk in the
space. The configuration is relatively trivial to automate, with IRR
data generat
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:02 PM, chris wrote:
> I am trying to look into dsl in the RDU area and at&t customer service has
> been exceedingly unhelpful only telling me "no service available, we have
> no idea when services will become available, check back periodically".
> I would atleast like to
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:58 PM, James Wininger wrote:
> We are a smaller ISP in Indiana. We are growing quite rapidly (yeah for
> us). We have a need for a customer notification system. We have simply
> out grown the ability to send emails to our customers manually. We need
> to have a better way
I've had similar experiences to Mr. Petach.
Depending on order of operations, you can look at this from a
different prospective as well -- why go with a soulless entity for
your transit (or transport, collocation, ...) requirements, when you
can "keep it in the family" and engage a peer who alread
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
>> We have always accommodated temporary ACL's for active DDOS attacks. I
>> think that is fairly standard across the ISP/hosting industry.
Indeed. We'll do it; ditto every reputable hosting,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> Isn't it just more of the same, or am I brainnumb today?
What's changed is the introduction of "bit miles" as a means of
calculating equality, where traffic ratios might previously have been
used. Explained further, as pointed out on-list ear
What are thoughts on public disclosure limited to capacity constraints?
There is ample business reason for making the terms of specific
interconnects private. On the other hand, knowing definitively that
{mon,du}opoly broadband provider A is running its connections to
transit provider B hot could
I'm sorry to interrupt the discussion of "how long is your rack?" and
"what do you do when your home ISP is down?" with something impacting
some folks' cost and manner of selling services, however Level 3 just
published its new peering guidelines, buried in comments on the L3/GX
merger:
http://f
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Joe Freeman wrote:
> If there's an AT&T contact on the list, or if anyone knows how to get a
> prefix filter updated, I'd appreciate a response.
You'll want to mail rm-awmis at ems.att.com, following up with a phone
call to +1-888-613-6330,3,2 once you get an auto
Also absent from this discussion is that the RIRs are still issuing
address space, and interface addressing is perfectly reasonable
justification.
-a
Realize also that China Telecom is congested both internally and on
certain peering interfaces.
While DPI is a likely culprit, be sure to not overlook a good
old-fashioned inability to manage capacity, combined with certain
hashing algorithms...
-a
We (voxel.net, AS 29791) offer dual-stack on all server and cloud
products. As others have pointed out, SoftLayer is an excellent
example of a hosting provider that Gets It on a large scale.
Sadly, v6 support on popular "cloud-only" services is suspiciously
absent. Terremark vCoudExpress, Savvis
On 2011-01-24-17:04:25, Andy Ashley wrote:
> Im looking for a little advice about DSL circuits in New York,
> specifically at 111 8th Ave [...]
You can get a CLEAR WiMAX fixed modem with static IP address for $50
(USD) monthly, or less if you opt for the low-bandwidth plan.
Unscientific testing
On 2010-12-22-19:44:31, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Yes, sorry I should've specified 10Gig-E and I would like to avoid
> using CWDM/DWDM optics if possible I would just like to use regular LR
> optics.
The common misconception is that, just because you're not installing
colored optics directly in your r
+1 on the CUBO recommendation. In addition to muxes, we've worked
with them as a supplier of (Finisar) colored optics; our dealings have
been extremely favorable on all fronts.
-a
On 2010-12-15-12:15:47, Kevin Neal wrote:
> Also assuming the backbone and distribution upgrades required between
> their data centers and their customers costs nothing. It's not free
> to get bandwidth from Point A (port with TATA) to Point B (Customer).
I don't see how this point, however vali
On 2010-07-21-15:08:10, Zaid Ali wrote:
> I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
> BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
> circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
> discussions I was told that it will c
Here in the New York Metro, XO's collocation offering is pretty solid.
No frills, but competently managed, and offered under a reasonable
pricing model for retail collocation.
I've had similarly positive experiences with their transport side of
the house. I've not looked at the IP product...
I c
On 2010-05-14-03:59:33, Randy Bush wrote:
> anyone have reccos for fiber
> from 60 hudson
> to 454 broadway
>From a cursory look at POP and GIS data not covered by NDA, I'm not
finding any vendors currently built into 454 Broadway. The usual
suspects for dark in the area include AboveNet,
On 2010-04-07-14:50:14, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> I manage some IP space that's provided by an ISP but is "owned" by XO. I
> am trying to have rDNS configured but their contact email
> (ipad...@eng.xo.com) in the whois does not grace me with a response (yet).
>
> Does anyone know if there is a w
On 2009-11-25-09:42:29, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> There is a new carrier neutral exchange space opening up December 1st
> at 165 Halsey in Newark, NJ. This space will be operated by Tishman
> Hotel & Realty LP :
>
> http://www.datacentermap.com/usa/new-jersey/newark/165-halsey.html
>
> I am th
On 2009-11-08-10:23:41, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Make sure they operate their own network for last mile
[...]
> I wouldn't sway from the big names for your primary connections
> either.
Because ownership of the provider/subsidiary delivering the last mile
means one hand is talking to the other, an
On 2009-10-22-16:19:53, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> Could a clueful AS1299 engineer please drop me a line? Dealing with
> the Level 0 technicians that are offered to IC clients is completely
> useless in diagnosing a rather serious issue.
r...@telia.net is a good place for routing/policy-related inquir
On 2009-07-12-06:09:12, Arie Vayner wrote:
> Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP"
> requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a
> limited view with a default route.
Disagree. Protection against big-provider depeerings, interdomain
capacity pro
On 2009-07-10-12:42:24, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
[...]
> What projections are you using regarding the default free zone over the
> next 5 years when picking new hardware?
Geoff Huston, et al provide some useful trending:
http://bgp.potaroo.net/index-bgp.html
With that said, I've been treating
On 2009-07-10-14:21:49, Duane Waddle wrote:
> I am searching for opinions on OEMs of X2 form factor 10G LAN PHY
> optics. We've found that most router/switch vendors mark these
> particular items up significantly just to provide their own
> sticker/EEPROM ID. As such, we'd prefer if we can to p
As Facebook might caution us, "it's complicated".
It's not uncommon for a 2.5G wave to be protocol-agnostic most of the
way through, and then required to pass through a SONET/SDH framer at
the end...
You've be well-served to find somebody at your carrier clued on their
transport platform, or ab
On 2008-11-02-10:14:14, Matthew Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But seriously, it shouldn't be necessary to have two connections at
> work [...]
This is less than clear, and largely dependent on a specific
organization's [in]ability to function if their internets go down.
End-site multihomin
Another vote for APC here. We've deployed many hundreds in various
receptacle configurations, and n'er any failures. The build quality
is definite cut above the competition, some with interiors that look
like they were assembled from duct tape and Radio Shack kits. :-)
As a word to the wise once
On 2008-09-22-15:01:35, Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody have a preferred supplier for 10GE XFPs, multimode and
> singlemode?
Fluxlight (www.fluxlightinc.com) is good source for 10GBASE-SR and LR
XFPs. They tend to keep an inventory, often able to ship on the day
of order; their w
48 matches
Mail list logo
