In message , Jared Mauch
writes:
> My personal favorite broken domain is New York State Thruway folks.
>
> https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp/cb652bc112
>
> If you ask for of www.thruway.ny.gov it is a CNAME to =
> www.wip.thruway.ny.gov and that
> breaks a number of DNS servers and load ba
Im thankful Nate posted. Gmail isnt a small system that affects only a small
percentage of people worldwide, and therefore a perfect candidate for a mail-
specific list that many (and many nanoggers like me) arent part of, for lack of
additional bandwidth in life.
However, gmail not working (simi
In article
you write:
>I was working within the limits of what I had available.
Here's the subscription page for mailop. It's got about as odd
a mix of people as nanog, ranging from people with single user linux
machines to people who run some of the largest mail systems in
the world, including
My personal favorite broken domain is New York State Thruway folks.
https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp/cb652bc112
If you ask for of www.thruway.ny.gov it is a CNAME to
www.wip.thruway.ny.gov and that
breaks a number of DNS servers and load balancers, eg:
$ host -t www.wip.thruway.ny.go
Excellent info, thank you Mark.
On Aug 26, 2016 6:53 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
>
> In message mail.gmail.com>, Josh Reynolds writes:
> >
> > Just looking at the RFC...
> > -
> > VERSION Indicates the implementation level of the setter. Full
> conformance
> > with this specification is indic
In message
, Josh
Reynolds writes:
>
> Just looking at the RFC...
> -
> VERSION Indicates the implementation level of the setter. Full conformance
> with this specification is indicated by version '0'. Requestors are
> encouraged to set this to the lowest implemented level capable of
> expr
I was working within the limits of what I had available.
I apologize if people on the list consider a network and systems
administrator reaching out to peers for assistance with a particular
problem that is clearly network related is inappropriate for a network
operations group list that may or ma
Hi Mel, There's another mailing list called 'mailop' which is probably
more appropriate for email related problems, than NANOG.
And in response to Nate:
I was in contact with Google and after some convincing and detailed header
information, they acknowledged that they are having internal MX is
Just looking at the RFC...
-
VERSION Indicates the implementation level of the setter. Full conformance
with this specification is indicated by version '0'. Requestors are
encouraged to set this to the lowest implemented level capable of
expressing a transaction, to minimise the responder and n
I would love to hear Amazon's response to this very question!
On 8/23/16 4:37 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
I'm curious. What are you trying to achieve by blocking EDNS version
negotiation? Is it really too hard to return BADVERS to a EDNS
query with version != 0 along with the version of EDNS you
On 08/26/2016 02:27 PM, Gabriel Kuri wrote:
> SNMPv3 uses TCP.
FWIW, TCP is one of many possible transports for SNMPv3. UDP is by far
the commonest in my experience, though.
> FYI - Charter engineers responded to me indicating it's a known bug with
> this Ubee modem and Ubee is working on a new
John,
With all due respect, it's S.O.P. for Nanogen to ask the list if anyone else is
experiencing a particular problem with some carrier or another. So Nate's
question is totally appropriate for this list. I know I've solved several
problems by airing them here and getting insight from other l
Thanks, John.
I was in contact with Google and after some convincing and detailed header
information, they acknowledged that they are having internal MX issues and
assure me that they will deal with the issue promptly.
Initially they did not even acknowledge that there was a problem, so it
took
In article
you write:
>Help (and hi)!
>
>I work in higher education and we've been experiencing problems with Google
>delaying or queuing email for delivery to our domain.
This is a question for Google, not for nanog. Only they know how their network
is set up and how their mail servers are man
Mike,
SNMPv3 uses TCP.
Also, I never said I had a daemon listening on port 161, the cable modem
would simply reboot if it saw a TCP SYN packet destined to port 161 to IP
address space sitting behind my cable modem.
FYI - Charter engineers responded to me indicating it's a known bug with
this Ube
Help (and hi)!
I work in higher education and we've been experiencing problems with Google
delaying or queuing email for delivery to our domain. Here's some truncated
email headers:
** Example 1:
X-Received: by 10.237.55.65 with SMTP id i59mr10986018qtb.62.1472137448952;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:04:0
On 8/24/16 8:13 AM, Arqam Gadit wrote:
Hello guys,
I am looking for a global network with:
- lowest possible latency
- lowest possible jitter (packet loss and latency variation)
- lowest possible monetary cost
You asked for:
- Fast
- Good
- Cheap
Sorry, but you're only allowed to c
On 08/24/2016 10:39 PM, Gabriel Kuri wrote:
I was able to confirm my Ubee
was susceptible to this bug and would reboot by simply telneting to IP
space on port 161 behind the modem. I figured my random reboots were
related to random people port scanning my IP space throughout the day. I
called
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.
19 matches
Mail list logo
