On 4/25/12, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 4/25/2012 10:31 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> There is nothing whatsoever wrong with providing the information to
>> ARIN under NDA. ARIN provides a very good (IMHO) plain English mutual
--
> Sure, and small ISP techs immediately think of NDAs when talking to
> ARIN.
This is the first time I've seen ARIN request actual individual names.
I've had them requests SWIP and I've had them request exact user counts,
and I generally get much larger allocations than what was being
allocated. In addition, all their numbers matched up with all of my
numbers and the all
On Apr 25, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Andy Susag wrote:
> We just recently "wrastled" with ARIN to get a whopping /22 from them,
> it wasn't very easy.
>
> Keeping record of what you have allocated downstream is important and I
> totally agree with ARIN insisting this be done. Luckily as long as you
> ha
Alex,
please get your postmaster to FIX the AV software so that it
emits a valid Content-Transfer-Encoding for multipart/mixed.
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="61eecb4035fc4e8de429abf6d62cd728"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
drugs:~/git/bind9] marka% show
(
"Andy Susag" writes:
> Seems kind of counterproductive to ARIN though. I wouldn't think they'd
> like a database full of fudged SWIP info, but I guess they're OK with
> it...
They require an officer attestation. SWIP info that is made up out of
whole cloth sounds suspiciously like fraud to me,
We just recently "wrastled" with ARIN to get a whopping /22 from them,
it wasn't very easy.
Keeping record of what you have allocated downstream is important and I
totally agree with ARIN insisting this be done. Luckily as long as you
have an address, customer name, and a contact, you can issue r
The contact form appears to be down (503 bad gateway on submit), and
if it is actively maintained, I would be very interested in talking to
someone about how it works, and how its path tracing simulations or
estimates compare with real-world numbers. (or if it is driven by real
world numbers, how i
No I am speaking about my previous positons with large providers, telco,
etc.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Kenneth McRae <
> kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.com> wrote:
>
>> I have never provided the names of end users.. How the address spa
Surewhatcha need? Or feel free to email n...@internap.com and
they'll be glad to help. If not, the beatings will commence!
--chip
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:37 PM, David Hubbard
wrote:
> Anyone know of, or have access to, a route server on
> Internap's (AS 12180) network? Trying to make s
Anyone know of, or have access to, a route server on
Internap's (AS 12180) network? Trying to make sure a
specific advertisement is being seen.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, -Hammer- wrote:
Killing me softly Owen
The difference is subtle, but important.
jms
Killing me softly Owen
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 4/25/2012 1:15 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Nope... You paid for and received registration services for a block of IP
Addresses.
Anyone can use those integers for many purposes, but, only you are registered
to use
Nope... You paid for and received registration services for a block of IP
Addresses.
Anyone can use those integers for many purposes, but, only you are registered
to use them as
topological identifiers on the internet according to ARIN and the other RIRs.
Owen
On Apr 25, 2012, at 10:59 AM, -Ha
Sorry everyone. Bad choice of words. I simply meant they have their
money and we have our allocation.
Stand down. Move along. Nothing to see here.
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 4/25/2012 11:55 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
No, you didn't. You may have completed the acquis
purchase/lease/rent/titlepawn/etc. We paid for and got a block of IPs.
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 4/25/2012 11:13 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:54:39 -0500, -Hammer- said:
I can say that I recently completed the purchase of a large IPv
I got a new allocation about 18 months ago. I sent them a spread sheet of
the users and their current IPs. I changed the real customer name to
something that reflected what business they were in. So I had lots of
"Hotel Customer 1" and "Dr. Office 112" with what IPs they were using.
There was no
Thanks everyone for all the responses. They were extremely helpful.
-Randy
- Original Message -
>
> Any Juniper MX experts out there want to do some quick consulting for
> me (not for free)?
>
> I am working on implementing a couple of MX5 routers in a service
> provider setting, and
No, you didn't. You may have completed the acquisition of a large IPv6 block,
but you did not purchase it.
Number resources are not property and cannot be bought and/or sold.
What you pay to ARIN pays for registration services (the registration of the
numbers, not the numbers themselves). While
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:54:39 -0500, -Hammer- said:
> I can say that I recently completed the purchase of a large IPv6 block.
"purchase"??!?
pgpMtR5JcMTNK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Kenneth McRae
wrote:
> I have never provided the names of end users.. How the address space
> would be utilized? Definitely.. But not the names of end users...
>
Probably because you are an "end user".
If you're talking about AS26347, I don't think there is any
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Chuck Anderson wrote:
RWHOIS is a perfectly valid alternative to SWIP.
Can a downstream ISP SWIP records if their upstream ISP uses RWHOIS
for the block that is further delegated to that downstream ISP?
I would think so, but it might also depend on how the space is deleg
I can say that I recently completed the purchase of a large IPv6 block.
We've had several large V4 blocks for years and got them with very
little effort. For this block, we had to provide a detailed list of all
our physical locations as well as how the IP schema would be utilized. I
also had to
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Kenneth McRae wrote:
I have never provided the names of end users.. How the address space would
be utilized? Definitely.. But not the names of end users...
When I worked at an ISP, we provided the names of companies to whom we
assigned address space, but not individual
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 08:28:35AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 3:23 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > ad...@thecpaneladmin.com wrote:
> >> Anyone have any tips for getting IPs from ARIN? For an end-user
> >> allocation they are requesting that we provide customer names f
I have never provided the names of end users.. How the address space would
be utilized? Definitely.. But not the names of end users...
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> There is not a new policy added on to prevent hoarding. What is required
> is what
> has been required f
There is not a new policy added on to prevent hoarding. What is required is what
has been required for several years. Utilization information and proper
justification.
If you are seeking an ISP allocation, then, reassignment (customer) information
is
in fact part of that utilization information.
On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:57 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 4/24/2012 2:00 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I know that the ARIN process can, on occasion be tricky to navigate if you
>> don't
>> understand the subtleties of how some of the terminology is defined and that
>> people
>> often use terms which hav
On Apr 25, 2012, at 3:23 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>
> ad...@thecpaneladmin.com wrote:
>> Anyone have any tips for getting IPs from ARIN? For an end-user
>> allocation they are requesting that we provide customer names for
>> existing allocations, which is information that will take a while to
>>
Negative.. I have never had to provide end user information. I have been
required to provide utilization information. I am sure this "policy" is
and add-on to make it more difficult to prevent hoarding..
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:32
ad...@thecpaneladmin.com wrote:
Anyone have any tips for getting IPs from ARIN? For an end-user
allocation they are requesting that we provide customer names for
existing allocations, which is information that will take a while to
obtain. They are insisting that this is standard process and som
I didn't see any post on this topic here, so I just want to mention that RPKI
is officially supported on these Cisco platforms:
ASR1000, 7600, ASR903 and ASR901 – releases are 15.2(1)S or XE 3.5.
Early Field Trial is available for the following platforms (contact bduvivie at
cisco dot com):
ASR9
31 matches
Mail list logo
