Curious to what it says in the LERG about your switches & NXX's, too.
Are your trunks directly connected to VZW's switches or through another carrier?
I've had trouble in the past with calls failing to VZW. Their repair
organization was less than helpful until we called the the local switch tech
Have you tried looking for a Verizon routing or translations contact in the
LERG? This is the official way.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Tom Pipes [mailto:tom.pi...@t6mail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Carrier Contact
I ended u
- Original Message -
> From: "Tom Pipes"
> I ended up calling 611 on my Verizon phone and they were extremely nice and
> tried to help, but were unable to take it any further due the the fact that
> the call appears to route properly. The problem is that the call does
> route, but to the
I ended up calling 611 on my Verizon phone and they were extremely nice and
tried to help, but were unable to take it any further due the the fact that
the call appears to route properly. The problem is that the call does
route, but to the wrong switch in the wrong LATA and then routes over
failov
Mobile v6 folks,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Day wrote:
> T-Mobile: Nokia N900 works great thanks to you(admittedly a dead-end from
> Nokia, but it works with the same level of shell script and kernel hacking
> that all N900 users expect)
Add the Nokia N97 to this list, with cellul
>Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products?
>Do they improve TCP performance over WAN links? is it worth the price?
>mike
---
James and Eric have done outstanding contributing here. I just wanted to add a
tad bit of information leaving out the name b
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Day [mailto:toa...@dragondata.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:57 PM
To: Cameron Byrne
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: New IPv6 survey released on labs.ripe.net
No IPv6 on Sprint, US Cellular or Metro PCS though. They don't have anything
that supports
On 04/26/2011 09:16 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 04/26/2011 05:08 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:
On Apr 25, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
If you trust the issued certificates(!) being used to sign the mail, you at
least have a good indication that the spam is coming from the domain that it
> Can we get mobile devices added to this? Mobile consumes a large amount of
> address space and is especially well suited for ipv6-only operations.
I would rather make it a separate study. Integrating this with CPE might become
messy and it would make the survey really long and complicated. Of
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>
> Can we get mobile devices added to this? Mobile consumes a large amount of
> address space and is especially well suited for ipv6-only operations.
>
> Unfortunately, the results would be painfully narrow. Now that Nokia no
> longer support
- Original Message -
> From: "Tom Pipes"
> Does anyone know who I could contact at Verizon Wireless
> regarding mis-routing one of my NXX blocks?
Amazingly, customer service might be useful. I once called Sprint/Nextel
to tell them that my Nextel phone couldn't call the broadcast call-i
Greetings,
Does anyone know who I could contact at Verizon Wireless
regarding mis-routing one of my NXX blocks?
Off list responses are fine.
Thanks,
--
Tom Pipes
Essex Telcom Inc
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:56:55PM +0300, Rogelio wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
>
> >
> > Would it turn out to be less expensive to just start a new subscription as
> > if you never had one before?
>
> Usually places like this do it by serial number, in which case the
On Apr 27, 2011 5:49 AM, "Marco Hogewoning" wrote:
>
> Hi There,
>
> We just released a new version of the IPv6 CPE survey. After lots of
feedback on the previous editions, we are now doing a "proper" survey. Based
on the responses we receive in this survey we will be able to compile a new
edition
- Original Message -
> From: "Mikael Abrahamsson"
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
>
> > I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers
> > are the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists (and much of the various
> > software run on/over the internet is wr
On Apr 27, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
>
> On 27 Apr 2011, at 00:21, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Kevin Day wrote:
>> ...
>> To get ahead of the issue, we've put an IPv6 option into the World of
>> Warcraft interface with patch 4.1. So as IPv6 starts to become more
>> widely available t
Hi There,
We just released a new version of the IPv6 CPE survey. After lots of feedback
on the previous editions, we are now doing a "proper" survey. Based on the
responses we receive in this survey we will be able to compile a new edition of
our matrix and provide some more statistical backgro
On 27 Apr 2011, at 08:19, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
>
>> I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers are
>> the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists (and much of the various software
>> run on/over the internet is written b
On 27 Apr 2011, at 00:21, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Kevin Day wrote:
> ...
> To get ahead of the issue, we've put an IPv6 option into the World of
> Warcraft interface with patch 4.1. So as IPv6 starts to become more
> widely available the game will already be prepared to handle the switch
> ove
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers
are the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists (and much of the various
software run on/over the internet is written by volunteers, and/or given
away for free), we aren't going to get
20 matches
Mail list logo
