On 27 Apr 2011, at 08:19, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote: > >> I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers are >> the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists (and much of the various software >> run on/over the internet is written by volunteers, and/or given away for >> free), we aren't going to get there. The big deafening silence from SIXXS >> is really unfortunate in that it does actively affect my opinion of IPv6, my >> willingness to spend time implementing it, pestering my upstream about it, >> or having my business give a damn about it. Yes I know they're volunteers, >> but how much does that matter? > > So you would prefer that they shut down their service rather than provide > current level of support?
I've had very prompt and good replies from SixXS when I've contacted them. Equally students I know who use HE brokers are very happy with their service, e.g. HE have added features in response to feedback. Tim
