On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Steven Bellovin wrote:
What they really need is something more or less like an accurate zip
code, I suspect. They want to find out what real "broadband" speeds are
in different parts of the country. Putting in a fake address renders
your data useless.
The FCC used to co
On Mar 12, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> On 3/12/2010 09:13, J.D. Falk wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know of a library, sample code, etc. to help Oracle PL/SQL do
>>> CIDR math?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Not exactly sample code, but: I do that with MySQL by storin
Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 3/12/2010 09:13, J.D. Falk wrote:
Does anyone know of a library, sample code, etc. to help Oracle PL/SQL do CIDR
math?
Not exactly sample code, but: I do that with MySQL by storing the IP as
its integer value and using simple comparisons to see if that stored
Joe Greco wrote:
So:
I "decided" to use 5/8 for our internal networks because I felt that it
stretched my fingers too much to go all the way over to "1" and then over
to the other end of the top row to "0." 5 seemed a happier and easier
choice.
The Hamachi P2P VPN client beat you to it...
On 3/12/2010 09:13, J.D. Falk wrote:
> Does anyone know of a library, sample code, etc. to help Oracle PL/SQL do
> CIDR math?
>
Not exactly sample code, but: I do that with MySQL by storing the IP as
its integer value and using simple comparisons to see if that stored
value is within the range
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Joe Greco wrote:
> [something I didn't write]
>
> >> If 1.0.0.0/8 has been widely used as de-facto rfc1918 for many years,
> >> perhaps it is time to update rfc1918 to reflect this?
>
> I seem to recall that the WIANA project "decided" to use 1.0.0.0/8 for
> the "internal"
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Joe Greco wrote:
If 1.0.0.0/8 has been widely used as de-facto rfc1918 for many years,
perhaps it is time to update rfc1918 to reflect this?
I seem to recall that the WIANA project "decided" to use 1.0.0.0/8 for
the "internal" network within their meshAP project...
http
On Mar 12, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
> Axel Morawietz wrote:
>> Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:
>>> [...] Its
>>> amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.
>> one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.*
>> for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile p
Misters,
Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer
Science. I am currently working on High-Speed Network Security
Solutions.
DDoS is considered as "The Mother of All Cyber Threats" [1] therefore I
have intensively studied this topic.
By the way, I have read with inter
This report has been generated at Fri Mar 12 21:11:28 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 04-Mar-10 -to- 11-Mar-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS30890 35760 3.2% 80.4 -- EVOLVA Evolva Telecom s.r.l.
2 - AS45985 21116 1.
> There are sizable chunks that are fairly quiet (un-interesting
> numbers, luck of the draw, etc). Given that its mostly
> mis-configurations, laziness, ignorance, or poor planning... I suspect
> the worst ranges will need to be sacrificed, and the remaining 80-90%
> of the space used for legitim
There are sizable chunks that are fairly quiet (un-interesting
numbers, luck of the draw, etc). Given that its mostly
mis-configurations, laziness, ignorance, or poor planning... I suspect
the worst ranges will need to be sacrificed, and the remaining 80-90%
of the space used for legitimate alloca
> Axel Morawietz wrote:
> > Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:
> >> [...] Its
> >> amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.
> >
> > one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.*
> > for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones.
> > And I'm not sure what they ar
On 12 Mar 2010, at 1:34, Kevin Loch wrote:
> Axel Morawietz wrote:
>> Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:
>>> [...] Its
>>> amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.
>>
>> one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.*
>> for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phon
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
> Axel Morawietz wrote:
>>
>> Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:
>>>
>>> [...] Its
>>> amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.
>>
>> one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.*
>> for their proxies that deliver the content
Axel Morawietz wrote:
Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:
[...] Its
amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.
one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.*
for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones.
And I'm not sure what they are doing when they are going
Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:
> [...] Its
> amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.
one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.*
for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones.
And I'm not sure what they are doing when they are going to receive this
route
On Mar 12, 2010, at 5:43 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> http://www.broadband.gov/
I'm listening to all this and thinking through the questions the FCC might be
asking. I'm also trying to do a somewhat-controlled test, which I'll give you
the first several samples of. See attached.
I picked up y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
I've recently begun updating the config rules for the CIS Router Audit
Tool (RAT) distribution. For those who have never heard of RAT, it is a
perl-based utility written by George M. Jones to audit router
configurations. It can be used to
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, John S. Quarterman wrote:
Anybody who wants to do it better, here's your chance:
https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=cb712eb3ef384ebe25bfbf6b0a5dfa16
Hmm, although it lists a number of FAR clauses but it seems none of them
reference the new requirements for IPv6:
http:/
Hello list,
Does anyone have any recommendations as to whether MOCA
upgrade path of coaxial DOCSIS last-mile is worth?
>From my experience, nobody from the vendors listed in the MOCA Aliance
cerified vendors has a real interest in contacting back. That's why I
think that maybe that technolody has
On 3/12/2010 13:22, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --- t...@americafree.tv wrote: From: Marshall Eubanks
>>
>>
>> This might be useful to some. Article :
>> http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B08720100312
>>
>> site :http://www.bro
--- s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
From: Steven Bellovin
On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> It requires giving your address.
> ---
>
> Nah, no real address needed. Just use 123 elm street abbeville alabama
> 36310. That's the first zi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:43:22AM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> [ ... ]
> http://www.broadband.gov/
If you can't get there, check DNSSEC first Lame server or bad signature:
Mar 12 08:57:57 mx1 named[18363]: no valid KEY resolving
'www.bro
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, John S. Quarterman wrote:
Anybody who wants to do it better, here's your chance:
https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=cb712eb3ef384ebe25bfbf6b0a5dfa16
Seems they'd be better off just gathering data from existing speedtest
networks. But speed isn't the only issue they shou
Comcasts Metro-E products are pretty stable. The topology of those networks
is fault tolerant with geographically diverse entry to the fabric for a
given premises are usually available. The non-PtP connections you are
referring to would be called Direct Internet Access, or DIA, but might have
anoth
On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> --- t...@americafree.tv wrote:
> From: Marshall Eubanks
>
> This might be useful to some. Article :
> http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B08720100312
>
> site :http://www.broadband.gov/
>
> It requires giving your address.
> ---
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, char...@knownelement.com wrote:
Does it work with IPv6?
Not by default as it seems the content server is IPv4 enabled only. I
suppose the Ookla-based tool would work over IPv6 also if the content
server was setup for IPv6.
Speedtest.net's tool works over IPv6 if the co
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
--- t...@americafree.tv wrote:
From: Marshall Eubanks
This might be useful to some. Article :
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B08720100312
site :http://www.broadband.gov/
It requires giving your address.
---
Nah, no real address needed. J
There is definitely something very broken in the gov't version of the
speedtest.net application. It seems very BW constrained. I can get great
results to a variety of ookla sites via test points across the US, but the
government one is always horrible.
We host both a pingtest and speedtest.net sit
Anybody who wants to do it better, here's your chance:
https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=cb712eb3ef384ebe25bfbf6b0a5dfa16
-jsq
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:26:14PM -0500, James Heralds wrote:
>> It would be highly appreciated if you could share this announcement with
>> your colleagues, students and individuals whose research is in information
>> security, cryptography, p
> On 3/12/2010 11:26 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
> So have other people noticed that the Ookla/Speedtest.net/Speakeasy
> Bandwidth test often comes up VERY short on upload bandwidth results for
> anything other than residential-grade asymmetrical services?
As we heard in Austin, residential (or at le
Not in Oracle, but PostgreSQL has a very robust implementation for CIDR,
including not only datatypes but also a host of operators to deal with them.
Being opensource, it always seemed plausible to me to port the functionality
into Oracle, learning from their implementation. Never got to actual
dev
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:26:14PM -0500, James Heralds wrote:
> It would be highly appreciated if you could share this announcement with
> your colleagues, students and individuals whose research is in information
> security, cryptography, privacy, and related areas.
>
> Call for papers: ISP-10,
On 12/03/10 11:26 -0500, Scott Berkman wrote:
So have other people noticed that the Ookla/Speedtest.net/Speakeasy
Bandwidth test often comes up VERY short on upload bandwidth results for
anything other than residential-grade asymmetrical services?
We often get complaints from customers saying "I
Does it work with IPv6?
--Original Message--
From: Marshall Eubanks
To: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: FCC releases Internet speed test tool
Sent: Mar 12, 2010 5:43 AM
This might be useful to some.
Article :
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B08720100312
site :
http://www.broadb
It would be highly appreciated if you could share this announcement with
your colleagues, students and individuals whose research is in information
security, cryptography, privacy, and related areas.
Call for papers: ISP-10, USA, July 2010
The 2010 International Conference on Information Secu
Does anyone know of a library, sample code, etc. to help Oracle PL/SQL do CIDR
math?
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/12/2010 11:26 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
> So have other people noticed that the Ookla/Speedtest.net/Speakeasy
> Bandwidth test often comes up VERY short on upload bandwidth results for
> anything other than residential-grade asymmetrical services?
Scott Berkman wrote:
> So have other people noticed that the Ookla/Speedtest.net/Speakeasy
> Bandwidth test often comes up VERY short on upload bandwidth results for
> anything other than residential-grade asymmetrical services?
The question to consider are: are JAVA based "speed" testers reliab
There are obviously some variables, buffering or something out there
since download speeds do not seem to be very consistent running the
tools several times. I tested three times each with the two engines.
>From SATX, TWC/RR:
Ookla
Download Speed 24408 2849422662 Kbps
Upload Speed
We are currently in talks with Comcast with regards to their metro
ethernet products in New Jersey and Illinois, for internet bandwidth
not L2/PTP. I'd like to hear opinions from others who have the
service, in regards to uptime, support, and performance. Thank you in
advance!
--
Jeffrey Negro
So have other people noticed that the Ookla/Speedtest.net/Speakeasy
Bandwidth test often comes up VERY short on upload bandwidth results for
anything other than residential-grade asymmetrical services?
We often get complaints from customers saying "I'm not getting the upload
bandwidth I'm paying f
[...] )
Expired signatures... zone won't validate.
AlanC
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :
http://mailman.nanog.org/mail
We've never cared about ratios... its futile!
Level3 is slow to update prefix lists this time. I simply picked a
couple networks that respond to my emails. My laziness to call others
is why the route isn't visible there. :)
,N
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
>
A trace-route reaches the Youtube border... so everything is ok. The
routes are being ECMP'd to a set of capture hosts for the purpose of
spreading load, aggregating more disk-space for packets, providing
some form of redundancy for the experiment, etc. We're receiving about
175mbps of unsolicited
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:34:10AM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Oh, I understand what's going on exactly. YouTube is trying to
> balance their ratios. :)
That might explain why they're only announcing it behind Cogent. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergenhttp://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:53 AM, William Pitcock
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:52 -0800, Nathan wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm hoping to alleviate the "what's going on!?" type messages here this
>> time. :)
>>
>
>
> Any IPs we can ping and get a response back from to verify everything is
> ok?
Joe Greco wrote:
> Correction: it _requires_ Java. It _asks_ for your address. It seems
> like it'd work fine if you gave it your neighbor's address. :-)
>
> I noted that I got wildly varying numbers on a laptop and an iPhone (there
> is also an iPhone app) and the iPhone app doesn't ask for an add
;
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> http://www.broadband.gov/
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.broadband.gov. 86400 IN A 4.21.126.148
www.broadband.gov. 86400 IN RRSIG A 7 3 86400 20100309192609 (
20091209192609 46640 broadband.gov.
[...] )
E
I could imagine that the FCC sees it as a data source.
On Mar 12, 2010, at 6:34 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Joe Greco wrote:
>> I've gotten strange stuff each time I've tried their tests. I
>> particularly like the factor of 10 difference in upload speeds.
>
> The FCC is prob
On 3/12/2010 08:43, Joe Greco wrote:
> As such, the only real value I see the FCC tool offering is the potential
> for visibility into things such as DSL speed/distance limitations, but in
> order for that to be meaningful, you'd have to get a lot of people to run
> the test.
>
> Which brings us
Mirko Maffioli wrote:
I'm searching for a switch with at least one 10Gbase-T ethernet port
and some gigabit ethernet for lab test.
>From cisco web site i've seen for example a 3560 model with X2 module
and CX4 port but nothing with 10Gb-T.
Unfortunately my budget couldn't arrive to nexus or cat6
Can't go wrong with RouterOS. The whole OS will boot on a 32meg drive
if you needed it too. Contact us if you need hardware/software :)
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, Mikrotik Certified Trainer, MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE,
MTCTCE, MTCUME
Link Technolo
Joe Greco wrote:
I've gotten strange stuff each time I've tried their tests. I
particularly like the factor of 10 difference in upload speeds.
... JG
Yeah...these test are algorithm based and rarely accurate! On our
100Mbps Internet connection (which I know handles 100Mbps) best I could
g
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Joe Greco wrote:
> > I've gotten strange stuff each time I've tried their tests. I
> > particularly like the factor of 10 difference in upload speeds.
>
> The FCC is probably doing this because US providers generally don't
> release actual bandwidth, speeds or latency numb
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Joe Greco wrote:
I've gotten strange stuff each time I've tried their tests. I
particularly like the factor of 10 difference in upload speeds.
The FCC is probably doing this because US providers generally don't
release actual bandwidth, speeds or latency numbers their con
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:30:38PM +, Paolo Lucente wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:20:41PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> > On 11.03.2010 16:29 Dylan Ebner wrote
> >
> > > Do the Arista switches support netflow? From a management perspective
> > > netflow can be vital. This is something we
> I noted that I got wildly varying numbers on a laptop and an iPhone (there
> is also an iPhone app) and the iPhone app doesn't ask for an address. Both
> on the same wifi and connection, and the numbers were off by a lot.
And I meant to include examples, but fingers committed the message
before
> This might be useful to some.
>
> Article :
>
> http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B08720100312
>
> site :
>
> http://www.broadband.gov/
>
> It requires giving your address.
Correction: it _requires_ Java. It _asks_ for your address. It seems
like it'd work fine if you gave it your
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> http://www.broadband.gov/
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.broadband.gov. 86400 IN A 4.21.126.148
www.broadband.gov. 86400 IN RRSIG A 7 3 86400 20100309192609 (
20091209192609 46640 broadband.gov.
[...] )
> http://www.broadband.gov/
i suspect the bandwidth tests are a bit latency sensitive
> It requires giving your address.
did not really like a tokyo postal code
randy
If you have fios please don't use this, if you have relatives with dial, make
them use it :)
- Jared
On Mar 12, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> This might be useful to some.
>
> Article :
>
> http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B08720100312
>
> site :
>
> http://www.broadban
This might be useful to some.
Article :
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B08720100312
site :
http://www.broadband.gov/
It requires giving your address.
Regards
Marshall
On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Nathan wrote:
> I'm hoping to alleviate the "what's going on!?" type messages here this time.
> :)
Oh, I understand what's going on exactly. YouTube is trying to balance their
ratios. :)
--
TTFN,
patrick
> Here's an except from the APNIC provided LOA I provided
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:42:50AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > Does it make sense/work to do this for internal operations even if our
> > outside connections are IPv4 only (forget about tunneling). Even more
> > mundane questions like how to deal with IPv4 only networked printers
> > when ev
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:52 -0800, Nathan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm hoping to alleviate the "what's going on!?" type messages here this time.
> :)
>
Any IPs we can ping and get a response back from to verify everything is
ok? 1.2.3.4 isn't pingable, for example. :(
William
I agree, this looks to be bit torrent traffic, The Pirate Bay has a
practice of injecting fake client IP address. I have a feeling that is
what your seeing. I would write more but power is out and the battery is
going
James Hess wrote:
Well, those UDP captures appear to be BitTorrent Pee
71 matches
Mail list logo
