On 12 Mar 2010, at 1:34, Kevin Loch wrote: > Axel Morawietz wrote: >> Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan: >>> [...] Its >>> amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is. >> >> one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.* >> for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones. >> And I'm not sure what they are doing when they are going to receive this >> route from external. ;) > > If 1.0.0.0/8 has been widely used as de-facto rfc1918 for many years, > perhaps it is time to update rfc1918 to reflect this?
Marla and I have drafted a document examining the issues associated with designating additional private address space: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issues-03 Please let us know if you have suggestions for improvements to the document. Leo
