On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Kevin Loch <kl...@kl.net> wrote: > Axel Morawietz wrote: >> >> Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan: >>> >>> [...] Its >>> amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is. >> >> one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.* >> for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones. >> And I'm not sure what they are doing when they are going to receive this >> route from external. ;) > > If 1.0.0.0/8 has been widely used as de-facto rfc1918 for many years, > perhaps it is time to update rfc1918 to reflect this?
Cisco has an interesting write-up on this: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_10-3/103_awkward.html
