Re: vvv.nntp and local spools

2002-02-18 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi Peter, On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:27:40PM -0600 Peter Horst wrote: > Can the vvv.nntp package be used with a local spool, à la slrn/slrnpull? > I just patched 1.3.25i with it, and it's great, but it would be better > without the slow Internet article checking, etc. I don't know wether it work

Re: Another Color to new Mail.

2002-03-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 09:22:30AM -0300 Michel wrote: > 1 drwxr-sr-x 31 michel michel 2048 Mar 09 07:33 ../ > 2 drwxr-sr-x 2 michel michel 1024 Mar 09 08:45 Linux/ > 3 drwxr-sr-x 2 michel michel 1024 Feb 19 02:02 Musica/ > 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 michel michel

Re: Another Color to new Mail. (Solution)

2002-03-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hello, On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 02:15:57PM -0300 Michel wrote: >9 Feb 19 04:51 22 .. inbox@ >10 Mar 09 08:42 38377 ... lidas [...] > set folder_format= "%\%C %N %t %d %s %>. %f %\ " [...] > Only in

Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hallo, On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:09:09:PM -0500 Joel Hammer wrote: > One of the problems I have had with mutt is opening links to internet sites > in my email. Hmm, I use 'UrlView' which is much more flexible, usable and also extensible. Regards, Rocco -- BOFH excuse #351: PEBKAC (Problem Ex

Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hallo, On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:46:30:PM -0500 Joel Hammer wrote: > Well I found urlview. > I do not want to install yet another helpler application (yet). Also, can't > even download the thang. This urlview looks hardcore to me! The script is not too complicated, IMHO. Once installed simply p

Re: Filtering a message from the index -> procmail

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hello, On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:57:48:PM -0700 Steve Talley wrote: > The pipe command doesn't save the output of the command as a new > version of the message. It also doesn't mark the original message as > deleted. Right. But why not write a macro which: 1) pipes the message to a command (t

Re: Filtering a message from the index -> procmail

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:11:22:PM -0700 Steve Talley wrote: > Rocco Rutte wrote: > > Right. But why not write a macro which: > > > > 1) pipes the message to a command (this command may be a shell > >script using another instance of Mutt to send the *chang

Re: Filtering a message from the index -> procmail

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:48:00:AM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 01:01]: > > Should even fit on a line in your config > > as works by pressing just *one* key. I guess, this won't end up quickly and I'm running out of

Re: defining a command

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > % There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my > % own commands. Something like: > % > % define '' > % define &#x

Re: defining a command

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:56:43:AM -0600 Jeremy Blosser wrote: > Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal > scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have. Yepp. > Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;) It would

Re: Filtering a message from the index -> procmail

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 01:19:52:PM -0500 darren chamberlain wrote: > Quoting David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 21, 2002 13:15]: > > muttrc.sh is a small script to set up an m4 pipeline. I define > > a lot of things -- not just commands, but particular pattern > > sequences, conditional

Re: Replacing a message with its filtered output

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:33:47:PM -0800 Gary Johnson wrote: > You're going to too much work, and I would imagine that the results > don't look very good. To fix HTML e-mail, just put this in your mailcap > file: > text/html; w3m -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput > and thi

Re: experience/questions : switching from Netscape to mutt

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:10:52:AM +0100 Flavien wrote: > *) When reading a list, I often press 'd'. I would like mutt > to display the next _unread_ message, and not the next message > in the list (I have the messages sorted by thread, thus it > often displays messages I already read). Jus

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:09:41:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Care to give some examples? if [ muttversion != "1.5.0" ]; then source ~/.mutt/setup/nntp fi But you're right, this one may be done with a bash script. But - to me - it looks ugly havin a good mail client and some sort

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet - nntp patch vs BCC?

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:09:40:PM -0500 Andre Berger wrote: > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500: > > well, does this BCC header get posted, too? > > if not then I don't a problem.. *shrug* > Indirectly: > To: undisclosed recipients ; > is generated, but no mail is

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:50:29:PM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 01:40]: > > At least connditionals are absolutely missing > > in mutt's config file functionality. > .. and also missing with setup files > for el

Re: Can I use mutt to notify a message to all PC users running MS Windows on the network?

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:16:52:AM -0600 David DeSimone wrote: > J. Effendi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Can I use mutt to replace this kind of notification messages to all > > users easily? Where can I get more information about it? > Others have answered your first question, but I

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:18:11:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:12:41AM +0100: > > > > Not that I know, but it is quite dangerous to talk about Outlook in the > > context of mail clients. > Oh, it is

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:02:17:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I > enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the > message is. As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:23:06:PM -0800 Gary Johnson wrote: > I'm in a similar > situation where I need to periodically send to a distribution list a > document written in Word and would like to send it with a text/plain > version as multipart/alternative. Nothing I have done to edit the >

Re: Incredimail CRLF encoding

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:39:49:PM + Simon White wrote: > So, since I'm hopeless with encoding, can someone tell me if I can filter > these people's mail in the pager so I don't have to keep asking them to > plaintext? set display_filter="~/.mutt/scripts/displayfilter" ,[ displayfi

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:14:14:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 07:58:17PM +0100: > > > > > At the very least, it doesn't read RFC1521-compliant mails as > > > recommended in the standard. > &g

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:25:21:AM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:04:14AM +0100: > > > > Just wondering why 1524 is so important to you... > You lost me. You lost me. We lost us. ;-) > To the best of

Re: mailbox question - mutt is *not* a filter!

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:40:23:PM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote: > * Matthias Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 06:50]: > > Then I have a question regarding address books - > > is there support for something alike in mutt?? > use "addressbook" I recommend using 'lbdb' ('little brother datab

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:56:57:PM +0100 Martin Karlsson wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 19.58 +0100]: > > ;-) It seems that Outlook users get along with one another so everything > > works as intended. > And now all Solaris-users can enjoy

Command expansion

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, I send this to the user's list and not to developer's because I do not want to 'spam' anybody. The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time in the file I specify by the 'record' variable. Using

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:38:10:PM + Simon White wrote: > If you use L (default mapping) to reply to lists, you will always reply > just to the list address, as long as it is defined as a list in your > muttrc. > The reply-to should then be redundant, because people /should/ just reply

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:31:43:PM +0100 Marco Fioretti wrote: > Here where I work we use Ultra sparc machines, but have no root password > and only 100 MB of quota = can't compile and install stuff, and are forbidden > to do so: this situation is much more frequent than many Unix guru expec

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote: > Text based rules, Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-) > but in Solaris you are stuck with CDE anyway, it's not > worth shit

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:02:31:PM -0500 darren chamberlain wrote: > I think if you \ the backticks, they will be evaluated when the > variable is read, and not when the config is read. So, instead > of: > set record="`date +'%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M'`" > use something like: > set record="\`da

Re: Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:08:33:PM + Sean Rima wrote: > I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back > to the list of active groups when using Mutt/NNTP Probably does depend on the patch. Which one do you use? I use the vvv.nntp patch. Just move around as

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:29:58:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: > % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few > % dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time > Heh. And you talk about not wanting to spam! :-) You're lucky. I'm too ti

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:57:23:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: > > > A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I > > > enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:03:43:AM +0100 Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Mar 26 at 20:38, Rocco Rutte spoke: > > Yes, but some people on other lists do not use mutt and/or not L. As I > > create the 'subscribe' entries for mutt's config by a script I also > &

smime_keys

2002-03-29 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hey, I finally had some time to left to set up S/MIME with Mutt 1.5.0 on Debian and FreeBSD. According to the documentation, I initially try to run 'smime_keys init'. The sample smime.rc is sourced in .muttrc, OpenSSL is installed on both systems. In fact, on FreeBSD (and this is extraordinary s

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-03-29 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: > Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really > know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or > do even they have problems? ,[ /home/pdmef/.gnupg/options ]- | | # Options for

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-29 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:51:00:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Well, every high school in north america would have you think that > without a start button, a computer is completely useless and broken. In Germany there's a campaign running to connect every school to the internet. IIRC,

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:16:13:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: > > In Computer Science I spent two terms on creating a website on something > > dealing with new media (okay, surfing all the time and hacking it > > toge

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:36:41:AM + Simon White wrote: > Computer courses should teach about computers, not some proprietary > software guff. Doesn't have to be programming, but how about file systems, > and troubleshooting procedures? Troubleshooting is part of what I think makes most

Re: Display Error Redux

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: > set pgp_verify_command="gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --verify %s %f" > set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose --batch --with-colons >--keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r" [...] > > I neither s

Re: Display Error Redux

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 02:11:21PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: > Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > > I only have: > > > > set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --batch --recv-keys %r > /dev/null 2>&1" > > I just have a keyserver in my op

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:51:00:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Well, every high school in north america would have you think that > without a start button, a computer is completely useless and broken. I'm pretty sure that the school I went to still has those 286 Siemens machines with M

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:03:38:AM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100: > > > > Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to 'user@machine' > > it says that only root may

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:17:05:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: > Matthew, et al -- > ...and then Matthew D. Fuller said... > % I think he actually means 'hostname', not 'uname'; hostname, on any sane > % system, displays the hostname when called with no args, and tries to set > I agree so far, b

Re: Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 11:25:18:AM + Sean Rima wrote: > Sorry should have said but yes it is the vvv patch, so thanks a million :) No problem. Pressing '?' for help every now and then will list which key is currently available with description. Rocco msg26478/pgp0.pgp Descriptio

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:18:15:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > % The following doesn't work, too: > % > % set record='`date +/tmp/%H%M%S`' > Oh, I get it -- $record is only parsed once, so it will only be set once, > no m

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 06:49:32:AM -0600 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:08:50AM + I heard the voice of > Dave Smith, and lo! it spake thus: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Just logged into a solaris box. Having set

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:12:56:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: > Eh? Who the heck set up your box? An administrator, maybe. ;-) Rocco msg26481/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Irony getting in the way (Was: Re: ignore...)

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:07:07:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus: > > Rob, your X-Uptime header shows even the no. of hundreds odf > > seconds; I think Rocco ironically suggests that it perhaps could be > > more specific -> meaning that he thinks it is _ve

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: > ...and then Shawn McMahon said... > % There's more than one keyserver network. > So it seems. > Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really > know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with eac

smime_keys

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hey, I finally had some time to left to set up S/MIME with Mutt 1.5.0 on Debian and FreeBSD. According to the documentation, I initially try to run 'smime_keys init'. The sample smime.rc is sourced in .muttrc, OpenSSL is installed on both systems. In fact, on FreeBSD (and this is extraordinary s

Re: X-Mailer header

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:17:46:PM -0500 David Collantes wrote: [ Mutt doesn't set X-Mailer ] This is just a kind of advertising. If you'd like you can create one with a simple my_hdr command like this one: folder . my_hdr X-Mailer: Mutt/$version How to grep the version number out of 'mu

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:13:16:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: > Rocco, et al -- > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > By the way, I find myself wondering how you tell mutt to not quote blank > lines as you have here. Or do you have an editor startup command that > changes all &

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:38:46:PM +0200 Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 16:35:14 +0100]: [...] > > So, as I said, a general solution. Sounds nice, at least to me. > But $signature is of type path. You can use a pipe there ri

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:25:20PM +0100: > > ... but it doesn't help at all if people don't submit their key because > > of paranoia. > What's most an

Re: Irony getting in the way (Was: Re: ignore...)

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:54:17:PM -0800 Will Yardley wrote: > Rocco Rutte wrote: > > > At least it was the smiley after your question which confused me. As I > > read you use a linux from scratch. Are you sure it looks professional > > advertising uptimes of 1

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: >

Re: Irony getting in the way

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:26:05:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > It'd be easier to just make /proc/uptime writable... Yeah, but you would have to ... > (Yes, I'm aware that requires a code change, not just chmod. Every > time I say this I get some idiot pointing this out to me, like I didn

Re: Irony getting in the way

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:08:37:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: > > It may sound funny, but I really saw some Linux guys talking about what > > would be necessary to replace a kernel 'on the fly'. > Didn't that

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-04-02 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [04/02/02 01:12:14] wrote: > Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > > > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at > > > 11:02:23PM +0200: > > > >

Re: change $record based on mailboxes -> copy+save_name

2002-04-03 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Jun Sun [04/04/02 04:57:13] wrote: > Don't you think it is a common sense to save a copy of outgoing message > to the *same* folder as you are reading from? No, not really. Why should I do this? Unless there's something important in a folder I delete everything if I leave it. Otherwise I w

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
you even need one -- is at the bottom. Are you really sure about that one? I currently have: ,[ ~/.mutt/setup/folder-hooks ]- | | folder-hook . 'my_hdr Reply-To: Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' | [...] | folder-hook =IN.mutt-users 'my_hdr Reply-To: mutt-users <[EMAIL

Re: language-problem -> no locales files foo.mo

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Heiko Heil [04/04/02 19:00:52] wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:30:35PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > > and next thing you know it'll be "handbuch handbuch" instead of "man > > man". no thanks. Hey, sometimes it would be really funny! Think of this one: 'katze < mahlzeit > katzeklo' ;-)

Re: PGP Signing and Password

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04/04/02 23:04:41] wrote: > I have just got GNUPG working with Mutt, and since I am still new to > Mutt and PGP I am very impressed. Fine. > However by default (my choice), I now sign all outgoing emails > (including this one I hope), I have increased the timeout thresh

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/04/02 21:59:38] wrote: > Rocco, et al -- > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > % * David T-G [04/04/02 18:48:49] wrote: > % > Contrast this to an fcc-hook or a folder-hook, only one of which can be > % > applied; mutt goes through the list and stops at the

Re: Sending mail to a recipient

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04/04/02 23:08:19] wrote: > In Mutt, quite often I want to send an email to someone, but I want to > be able to highlight an email from them, and click "Send it to this > person, but it isn't a reply" - if that makes sense. I try to repeat what you want to make sure I th

Re: PGP Signing and Password

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/05/02 00:06:31] wrote: > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > % > [talking about PGP passwords and such] > FWIW, if gpg is installed on your machine with the proper root permissions > then it can keep the passphrase from being swapped out to disk, which > m

Re: Sending mail to a recipient

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04/05/02 01:50:49] wrote: > Yep, I have just looked into and sucessfully installed lbdb, it was just > what I was looking for. However I have to pass a query string to lbdb, > so I am just working out how to display all entries in the system. Maybe via "display_filter"

Re: language-problem - krauts and kittys

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Sven Guckes [04/05/02 18:32:12] wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 19:45]: > > > I love silly translations. Yesterday I worked > > > with a german Red Hat-distribution (user elvis): > > > Gnome created an icon called "Heimat von

Re: OT: language-problem - krauts and kittys

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Simon White [04/05/02 19:18:44] wrote: > 05-Apr-02 at 18:32, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > "Pfeife zerbrochen" > Broken pipe, I suppose. Yes. > Just like the dumb lady I was talking to once, who told me she was > airing her room when I told her to close the window. ;-)) V

Re: .muttrc variables

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David Collantes [04/05/02 19:22:13] wrote: [ dump config ] > Will this be useful to more people? Is it something worth to ask as a wish? > For me, it will be nice it I could: > $ mutt --dump-vars > And have a .muttrc-full some something dumped on my directory, with all > options and th

Re: .muttrc variables

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Will Yardley [04/05/02 20:55:36] wrote: [ config dump ] > i was actually going to suggest this a long time ago, but figured no one > would want to implement it. Strange... > this is very useful for getting help online and so on, since it's > generally much more compact than the actual po

Re: OT: language-problem - krauts and kittys

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Simon White [04/05/02 20:45:41] wrote: > 05-Apr-02 at 20:37, Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > Just like the dumb lady I was talking to once, who told me she was > > > airing her room when I told her to close the window. > > > > ;-)) > &g

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Jim MacBaine [04/05/02 23:52:27 CEST] wrote: > I'm regularly recieving perl and java programs > and I have to sort out "the good from the bad". Your boss doesn't seem to like you? ,-) > Right now I'm using mutt and use a mailcap entry > to open the attachments in NEdit to have the > synt

Re: un-alternates?

2002-04-06 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [04/06/02 23:48:54 CEST] wrote: > Well obviously the only solution here is to register a second domain and > tell your wife and kids that their new email address is > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (and whatever else for your kids), then the > 'justpick' thing will only match your ad

Re: Received header field

2002-04-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * José Romildo Malaquias [04/07/02 14:17:07 CEST] wrote: > Why mutt (1.3.27) is not showing the Received > fields from the header of the messages? How > can I configure it to show those fields? Try pressing 'h' and look at the manual for 'ignore' and 'unignore'. HTH, Cheers, Rocco. msg2

Re: un-alternates?

2002-04-08 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David Champion [04/09/02 00:40:53 CEST] wrote: [ regular expressions in mutt ] > But can we assume that perl is the same? Not until quite long test runs. > I don't believe that we can. > That's the essence of the question; unfortunately it needs someone who's > been paying attention to c

Re: Preferred muttrc syntax for "set" commands

2002-04-09 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote: > Who needs urlview? I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-) Cheers, Rocco. msg26921/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PGP: macro to fetch keys from keyserver?

2002-04-10 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Andre Berger [04/10/02 20:14:51 CEST] wrote: > I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from > signed messages, like > "gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY" > But how can I get/define $KEY? It depends on what your goal is. If you want gpg to automa

Re: PGP: macro to fetch keys from keyserver?

2002-04-10 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/10/02 19:37:40 CEST] wrote: > ...and then Andre Berger said... > % I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from > % signed messages, like > % > % "gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY" > % > % But how can I get/define $KEY? > Why rein

NFS problems

2002-04-10 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, I just started another attempt to get mutt 1.5 working at one of my accounts. Without any sucess so far. Hopefully someone can help. The situation so far is that sending mail doesn't work because mutt does not show up again after returning from the editor (saving works). I try to summarize w

Re: Setting of config var only temporarly

2002-04-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Michael Tatge [04/11/02 11:10:25 CEST] wrote: > Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific > > email to be send? I want: > > > > pgp_create_traditionl=no > > ... > > send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA

Re: [OT] cc: poster vs reply-only-to-list

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Simon White [04/11/02 19:46:13 CEST] wrote: > 11-Apr-02 at 12:21, David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I always hit L to reply to lists, and hope that Mutt will reply as > intended. This usually means a CC: to the person that posted as long as > they set up their headers that way.

Re: NFS problems

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David DeSimone [04/13/02 01:40:19 CEST] wrote: > Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The situation so far is that sending mail doesn't work because mutt > > does not show up again after returning from the editor (saving works). > Use 's

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * s. keeling [04/13/02 02:10:27 CEST] wrote: > That's the background. So in my ~/.mailcap, I tried "links %s; > copiousoutput": > [-- Autoview using /usr/bin/links '/home/keeling/.mutt/tmp/mutt9aipDt' --] > [-- Autoview stderr of /usr/bin/links '/home/keeling/.mutt/tmp/mutt9aipDt' --] >

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * s. keeling [04/13/02 03:11:49 CEST] wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > > Try 'w3m -dump' for autoview. > Thanks Rocco. Problem solved. Much appreciated. No problem. I didn't mention the manpages for those 3 te

Re: NFS problems

2002-04-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Aaron Schrab [04/13/02 19:31:32 CEST] wrote: > I don't know why this would happen with glibc, but with dietlibc the > st_size element of struct stat is unsigned, so unless it hits 0 exactly > the test will always succeed. As I said, it happened in both cases: statically linked against glib

Re: NFS problems

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Aaron Schrab [04/14/02 01:20:38 CEST] wrote: > The patch shouldn't affect security in any way. Temporary files are > still overwritten, I just added a test for when the entire file has been > overwritten that will work properly on systems where the size returned > by the stat system call i

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: > * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: > I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? Must be you. Verified here. Cheers, Rocco. msg27139/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

PGP signature verification (was: Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem)

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 13:12:18 CEST] wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]: > >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: > >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: > >> I cannot verify your signature

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/14/02 16:54:58 CEST] wrote: > ...and then Thorsten Haude said... > % * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]: > % >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: > % >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: > % >

Re: PGP signature verification

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]: > >Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your > >$pgp_verify_command look like? > gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --verify %s %f Except '--

Re: S/MIME

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/13/02 10:41:21 CEST] wrote: > I want to get a better picture about S/MIME, but can't find an > introduction in the net. Could one of you point me to a S/MIME > introduction or tutorial that is written for the user? The "Linux Security HowTo" just points to one of Netscap

Re: PGP signature verification

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 23:06:03 CEST] wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 22:46]: > >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: > >> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]: > >> >Hmm, ch

Re: PGP signature verification

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/15/02 00:53:17 CEST] wrote: > * Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 00:41]: > >I cannot verify (April only): > With neither 1.5.0 nor 1.3.27 (except for S/MIME of course). Exactly. But only checking David's. > -- > Alles ist richtig, auch das Gegenteil. >

Re: PGP signature verification

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Alain Bench [04/14/02 21:15:34 CEST] wrote: > Hello Thorsten, > On Sunday, April 14, 2002 at 1:12:18 PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: > > I cannot verify the following IDs (only checked April): > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Strange:

Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * skidley [04/15/02 01:45:06 CEST] wrote: It would be nice if you could wrap your lines at somewhat around 70 characters/line. > When I started mutt after a new install I get > /var/spool/mail/ is not a mailbox. I've never > seen such a thing. So I ran fetchmail and it created > /var/spool/

2 questions

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, I have two questions and hope someone can help. 1) folder-hooks are executed when entering a folder. What I'd like to have is a macro automatically executed after the scores are applied to messages and after sorting. Background: For newsgroups I have a couple of scoring rules app

Re: PGP signature verification

2002-04-15 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/15/02 14:06:08 CEST] wrote: > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > % * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: > % > gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --verify %s %f > % > % Except '--quiet' the same here. > I don't h

Re: Is pgp_strict_enc working

2002-04-15 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote: > I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode > message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to > no in my .muttrc, but mutt still encode it before sign. What's wrong? Me > or mutt? (Of course! Mut

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >