Hi, * David Champion [04/09/02 00:40:53 CEST] wrote:
[ regular expressions in mutt ] > But can we assume that perl is the same? Not until quite long test runs. > I don't believe that we can. > That's the essence of the question; unfortunately it needs someone who's > been paying attention to code evolution (or a C reader with way too much > free time) to answer it. Yep. Maybe I'm missing something at this point, but why not grep 'mutt -v' to find out what of kind of regexps used and use the same code to produce a short parser for the contrib directory? IMO, it would take less time to do that than to find some existing software expected to behave as mutt does (without verification). Cheers, Rocco.
msg26900/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
