can instruct Mutt to automatically downloads the text
message (body) but ask me what to do with the attached files (get them,
view them, store them, leave them...)?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:36:32 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
> Is there any way I can instruct Mutt to automatically downloads the text
> message (body) but ask me what to do with the attached files (get them,
> view them, store them, leave them...)?
A user of Debian mailing list poin
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:46:31 +0100, Joost Kremers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:33:38PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Is it really still opened, that is, not implemented? :-)
>
> I don't know if the mutt developers read this list, but if they do, I
> would ve
mes from Yahoo!
webmail service and Thunderbird. Does not happen when e-mail comes from
another MUA (Kmail, Alpine...).
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:11:21 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Camaleón [04-11-10 08:18]:
>> I am having troubles for displaying messages with long lines in Mutt
>> (1.5.18). They get wrapped, yes, but in strange manner.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> ***
>
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:59:03 +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Camaleón schrieb am 11.04.2010 um 13:22:52 (+):
>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:11:21 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
>> > in ~/.muttrc
>> > unset markers
>> >
>> > note that proper syn
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:38:02 +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Camaleón schrieb am 11.04.2010 um 14:14:34 (+):
>
>> I tested with:
>>
>> ***
>> set smart_wrap
>> set wrapmargin = 2
>> ***
>>
>> And also:
>>
>> ***
>> s
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:11:10 +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Camaleón schrieb am 11.04.2010 um 14:53:51 (+):
(...)
>> But, how the viewer can mix/interact with the pager? Is that possible?
>> I thought they were two separate settings (one for editing new messages
>> a
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:14:18 -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> I am having troubles for displaying messages with long lines in Mutt
>> (1.5.18). They get wrapped, yes, but in strange manner.
>
> Sounds like a problem of
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:33:21 +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:33:21 +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Camaleón schrieb am 11.04.2010 um 17:17:51 (+):
>
>> I get an unusable pager *but* long lines do not wrap. So I think the
>> problem relies in built-in
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:29:58 -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2010 at 06:17 PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> Only some! That is what makes me puzzle :-)
>>
>> E-mails coming from Kmail, Alpine or even Gmail webmail (text based
>> format) are fine, they wrap as they sh
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:32:11 -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:17:24PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> - Image sample of failing e-mail (it will be auto-deleted in 7 days):
>> http://picpaste.com/20100411_mutt_pager_wrapping.png
>>
>> - Raw code s
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:24:30 -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:57:04PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> But the message indeed was set to use "format=flowed" as seen in the
>> code sample I sent before.
>
> In that example there was no
ht things while Gmail is a bit... let's say "liberal" when it comes to
implement/interpret the standards :-)
So I wonder what would be the best way to bypass this or if someone has
had a previous experience similar to this and can share his findings...
Any idea is very welcome.
P.S. Using Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:37:42 +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
> On 11.08.11,15:30, Camaleón wrote:
>> I'm facing a curious problem when I send attachments with Mutt from
>> command line.
(...)
>> All the process works fine but some of the files are wrongly encoded
&g
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:57:26 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On 8/11/2011 11:37 AM, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
>> What about putting the files in 2-3 zip files and send him? Also update
>> to mutt 1.5.21 which have many bug fixes after 1.5.18.
>
> Greetings Camaleón,
>
>
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:15:47 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:57:26 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
>
>> On 8/11/2011 11:37 AM, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
>>> What about putting the files in 2-3 zip files and send him? Also
>>> update to mutt 1.5.21 which ha
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:33:09 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On 8/11/2011 12:26 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> "zsplit" cannot do it. It requires the splitted size is at least the
>> size of the smallest of the archived files. I will have to search
>> another one ;-(
>
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:20:51 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On 8/11/2011 1:14 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:33:09 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
>>
>>> zip -s SIZE should do the trick ... split the archive at your
>>> designated size at creation,
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:03:09 +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 03:30:56PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> All the process works fine but some of the files are wrongly encoded
>> which results in an error when the user tries to reconstruct the
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:53:31 +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:01:12PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> What puzzles me is that raw splitted files stored in my disk all look
>> the same. I mean, "file" returns the same information for
21 matches
Mail list logo
