Hi, do you guys have any ways to conveniently copy a long URL which spans
across several lines and have + prefixes before it. Currently in the pager I
have to copy each part separatly in order to advoid copying the + prefix.
Hmm...is this question sound too trivial...?
Yubin
--
Yubin Ruan
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:09:44PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Hi, do you guys have any ways to conveniently copy a long URL which spans
> across several lines and have + prefixes before it. Currently in the pager I
> have to copy each part separatly in order to advoid copying the + prefix.
>
I ha
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:09:44PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
Hi, do you guys have any ways to conveniently copy a long URL which spans
across several lines and have + prefixes before it. Currently in the pager I
have to copy each part separatly in order to advoid copying the + prefix.
Hmm...is th
On February 28, 2018 11:31:43 AM GMT+01:00, Darac Marjal
wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:09:44PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
>>Hi, do you guys have any ways to conveniently copy a long URL which
>spans
>>across several lines and have + prefixes before it. Currently in the
>pager I
>>have to copy
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:43:05AM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#display-munging
> subjectrx was added in 1.8.0, it seems.
Thanks so much, I've been feeling the need for this for
a long time, finally satisfied :)
--strk;
Hei hei,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:28:18AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:09:44PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> > Hi, do you guys have any ways to conveniently copy a long URL which spans
> > across several lines and have + prefixes before it. Currently in the pager I
> > have
Todd Zullinger writes:
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#display-munging
>
> subjectrx was added in 1.8.0, it seems.
That's wonderful! Something I've been wishing for for a long time.
But the example in the manual doesn't work for me in 1.9.3
(on Debian testing, but I think that's back to being
* Akkana Peck on Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 09:28:41 -0700
Todd Zullinger writes:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#display-munging
subjectrx was added in 1.8.0, it seems.
That's wonderful! Something I've been wishing for for a long time.
But the example in the manual doesn't work for me
* Akkana Peck [02-28-18 11:50]:
> Todd Zullinger writes:
> > http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#display-munging
> >
> > subjectrx was added in 1.8.0, it seems.
>
> That's wonderful! Something I've been wishing for for a long time.
>
> But the example in the manual doesn't work for me in 1.9.3
> (o
* Patrick Shanahan on Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 12:10:59 -0500
some time ago, in an earlier age, Sven Guckes posted a sed or perl filter
to hide "Subject:" additions, but I seem to have lost it, and he seems to
be missing too :^(
Something like
sed -e '1,/^$/ s/^Subject: *\(Re: *\)*\[[^
On 2018-02-28 12:10, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> some time ago, in an earlier age, Sven Guckes posted a sed or perl
> filter to hide "Subject:" additions, but I seem to have lost it, and
> he seems to be missing too :^(
Here's what I do now as part of my incoming pipeline. Of course, this
in fact
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:28:41AM -0700, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Todd Zullinger writes:
> > http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#display-munging
> >
> > subjectrx was added in 1.8.0, it seems.
>
> That's wonderful! Something I've been wishing for for a long time.
>
> But the example in the manual doesn
El día Wednesday, February 28, 2018 a las 10:00:29AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy
escribió:
> Looks like the example might be wrong in the manual, unless there are
> regexp library differences. Because ']' is first in the character
> class (after the negation), it shouldn't need to be escaped. This
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:05:19PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Wednesday, February 28, 2018 a las 10:00:29AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy
> escribió:
>
> > Looks like the example might be wrong in the manual, unless there are
> > regexp library differences. Because ']' is first in the char
Kevin J. McCarthy writes:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:28:41AM -0700, Akkana Peck wrote:
> > But the example in the manual doesn't work for me in 1.9.3 [ ... ]
> > subjectrx '\[[^\]]*\]? *' '%L%R'
>
> Looks like the example might be wrong in the manual, unless there are
> regexp library differen
15 matches
Mail list logo