> On 28Nov15 09:55 +0200, Danny wrote:
> > O.k ... The messages older than 5 days gets tagged but not moved to the
> > archived
> > folder ...
>
> I was wondering about your /incoming root folder.
>
> > The mails gets put into ~/mail/incoming/operating_systems/FreeBSD (by
> > procmail)
> > ...
On 2015-11-25, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> Occasionally I get emails with multi megabyte attachments which I
> don't need to see; an old email whose attachments have already been
> saved, attachments I know I don't need to see, etc.
>
> Is there some configuration setting which prevents automatica
On Nov 29, 2015 at 19:42, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El d?a Sunday, November 29, 2015 a las 05:55:32PM +0100, Bernard
Massot escribi?:
I'm struggling to build mails readable on small screens, ie mails
whose lines wrap correctly even when there are few columns. I'm
indeed thinking of smart phones.
El día Monday, November 30, 2015 a las 03:44:50PM +, Samir Benmendil
escribió:
> > Your mail renders fine in my Ubuntu mobile phone BQ E4.5, in Dekko and
> > in mutt, see the screens:
> >
> > Dekko: http://www.unixarea.de/screenshot20151129_180118205.png
> > mutt: http://www.unixarea.de/sc
> > Later on, you can use '=' which expands to that path, e.g.:
> >
> > folder-hook FreeBSD$ push
> > 'T~d>5d;s=incoming/os/bsd/FreeBSD-OLD
> >
> > will save to a folder in ~/mail/incoming/os/bsd/FreeBSD-OLD
>
> I undestand this ... the messages are currently tagged "*" ... so that seems
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:03:04PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > No it does not: http://rmz.io/ff.png
>
> Can you put it soemwhere where only HTTP is onvolved. SSL claims the
> page as insecure.
It only claims that the certificate the server is using is
self-signed, meaning that it can't be va
El día Monday, November 30, 2015 a las 02:29:30PM -0600, Derek Martin escribió:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:03:04PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > No it does not: http://rmz.io/ff.png
> >
> > Can you put it soemwhere where only HTTP is onvolved. SSL claims the
> > page as insecure.
>
> It o
On 30Nov15 15:44 +, Samir Benmendil wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2015 at 19:42, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >El d?a Sunday, November 29, 2015 a las 05:55:32PM +0100, Bernard Massot
> >escribi?:
> >>I'm struggling to build mails readable on small screens, ie mails whose
> >>lines wrap correctly even when the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:52:41PM +0200, Danny wrote:
> > On 28Nov15 09:55 +0200, Danny wrote:
...
> >
> > will save to a folder in ~/mail/incoming/os/bsd/FreeBSD-OLD
> >
> > Also make sure that the folder already exists, otherwise mutt will ask
> > to create it.
> >
>
> The folder exists and
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:48:48PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > Can you put it soemwhere where only HTTP is onvolved. SSL claims the
> > > page as insecure.
> >
> > It only claims that the certificate the server is using is
> > self-signed, meaning that it can't be validated as belonging to
Derek Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:48:48PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > > Can you put it soemwhere where only HTTP is onvolved. SSL claims the
> > > > page as insecure.
> > >
> > > It only claims that the certificate the server is using is
> > > self-signed, meaning that it ca
On Nov 27, 2015 at 14:41, Jon LaBadie wrote:
One thought, if I'm away for a week or more this would archive several
days of unread mail. Adding a simple ~R to the pattern seems to
eliminate this concern. Are there any side-effects I overlook?
folder-hook FreeBSD$ push 'T~R~d>
5d;s/incoming/o
On Nov 30, 2015 at 22:10, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
On 30Nov15 15:44 +, Samir Benmendil wrote:
On Nov 29, 2015 at 19:42, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El d?a Sunday, November 29, 2015 a las 05:55:32PM +0100, Bernard Massot
escribi?:
I'm struggling to build mails readable on small screens, ie m
On Nov 30, 2015 at 21:48, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Monday, November 30, 2015 a las 02:29:30PM -0600, Derek Martin escribió:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:03:04PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
No it does not: http://rmz.io/ff.png
Can you put it soemwhere where only HTTP is onvolved. SSL claims
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 02:29:30PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> It only claims that the certificate the server is using is
> self-signed, meaning that it can't be validated as belonging to anyone
> in particular by the big certificate trusts. If you're willing to
> look at it without SSL entirely,
15 matches
Mail list logo