Michael Tatge wrote:
> Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
>> I am unable while in pager mode to use the tag-prefix (;) operator to
>> perform operations on tag-selected e-mails. Requires changing to the
>> 'index' menu for use.
> Yeah, so what? Comeon is that such a hard thing to do?
Perhap
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> set attibution="begin 666 quoted text of %boss"
begin followed by two blanks anywhere in the mail body would do, until
termininated by an
end
But what's the point? Bosses define what constitutes brokenness. If he
can't read your email, it's your f
Hey together,
I filed a bug, but I never saw it on the lists, nor in the bugs.guug.de
bugtracking system. Is flea not working?
The bug is a little nasty, since Mutt is deleting files where it should
not:
Create an attachment
Toggle-unlink
Detach-file
Now the file in the attachment is deleted (
* Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 09:56]:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> > set attibution="begin 666 quoted text of %boss"
>
> begin followed by two blanks anywhere in the mail body would do, until
> termininated by an
> end
two blanks? really?
> But what's the poi
* Mads Martin Joergensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 10:15]:
> I filed a bug, but I never saw it on the lists, nor in
> the bugs.guug.de bugtracking system. Is flea not working?
> The bug is a little nasty, since Mutt
> is deleting files where it should not:
>
> Create an attachment
> Toggle-u
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Aug 30. 2002 12:39]:
> > I filed a bug, but I never saw it on the lists, nor in
> > the bugs.guug.de bugtracking system. Is flea not working?
> > The bug is a little nasty, since Mutt
> > is deleting files where it should not:
> >
> > Create an attachment
> > Tog
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 07:25]:
> Michael Tatge wrote:
> > Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
>
> >> I am unable while in pager mode to use the tag-prefix (;) operator to
> >> perform operations on tag-selected e-mails. Requires changing to the
> >> 'index' menu for use.
* Mads Martin Joergensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 10:42]:
> > > I filed a bug, but I never saw it on the lists, nor in
> > > the bugs.guug.de bugtracking system. Is flea not working?
> > i remember such a bug - but it's been a while.
> > can you please add the version number for this?
> 1.3
begin Fri, 30 Aug 2002 Sven Guckes quotation:
> two blanks? really?
Of course. In fact I later noticed you used the same example in one of
your signatures.
> > But what's the point? Bosses define what constitutes brokenness.
> > If he can't read your email, it's your fault, not his client's
* Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 11:12]:
> begin Fri, 30 Aug 2002 Sven Guckes quotation:
> > two blanks? really?
> Of course. In fact I later noticed you used
> the same example in one of your signatures.
err... these have only *one* space after the "begin".
no, wait, one of them h
On Aug 29, Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> > you can always try but it has been my experience that these people
> > don't want to change to anything other than M$. if your boss is still
> > semi technical this might work; however, if he
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> so if the boss sends himself such an email using his own client and
> finds the same kind of effect - will he still believe that the
> problem is with *other* clients? if yes - change job.
Sven, bad thing to say right now. When most of your friends are
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Is Notes at least able to forward all incoming mail to an address?
>
> Our Exchange server doesn't have IMAP enabled either, so I've got some
> scripts that make it push incoming mail out to a unix box. Exchange can
> only forward, not redirect/bounc
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 13:15]:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > so if the boss sends himself such an email using his own
> > client and finds the same kind of effect - will he still
> > believe that the problem is with *other* clients?
> > if yes - change job.
* Stef Slamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 08:34:03 -0700]:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote:
> > Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA?
> > Just haven't found it yet, or...?
>
> Because I'm using ASK (www.paganini.net/ask), and it w
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 13:19]:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Is Notes at least able to forward all incoming mail to an address?
> >
> > Our Exchange server doesn't have IMAP enabled either, so I've got some
> > scripts that make it push incoming mail out
On Aug 30, Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Is Notes at least able to forward all incoming mail to an address?
> >
> > Our Exchange server doesn't have IMAP enabled either, so I've got some
> > scripts that make it push incoming mail out to
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > So, your boss using Outlook is really a minor thing
> > in the grand scheme of things right now. The fact
> > that you HAVE a boss right now is a godsend.
>
> err... my boss does not use Outlook. No way.
"You" in the generic form. ;-)
-Ken
Richard --
...and then Richard P. Groenewegen said...
%
% On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:22:25AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
% > Ouch, that's a lot of work. I think this will do it:
% >
% > fcc-save-hook . +%O
% >
% > The . applies the hook to all messages, and the %O turns into the
% > be
On Aug 30, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 13:19]:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > Is Notes at least able to forward all incoming mail to an address?
> > >
> > > Our Exchange server doesn't have IMAP enabled either, so I
Here is my .muttrc file
[darcym@jordan darcym]$ cat .muttrc
set folder=$HOME/Maildir
set spoolfile=$HOME/Maildir
set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
set hostname=mail.mdlan.net
When ever I read message and quit out I get the message
"move read messages to mbox"
the messages then dissapear. I thought
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:34:59PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> anyway, what good is it to wait to change jobs?
> if all changed jobs then they's swap one place
> with windows with another place using windows.
> the change must be within the system itself.
> and i am not only talking about opera
DARCY,MATTHEW (Non-HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> [darcym@jordan darcym]$ cat .muttrc
> set folder=$HOME/Maildir
> set spoolfile=$HOME/Maildir
> set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> set hostname=mail.mdlan.net
> When ever I read message and quit out I get the message "move read
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Though I haven't set that up here yet and just have a local address book
> for most of my contacts, and it works well enough it hasn't bothered me. I
> guess it helps most of the people here have standard-format user names.
This is government. The a
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:12:41PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> extract the Subject line with "grep":
> macro index S "grep -i '^subject:'\n"
Didn't work for me; could that happen due to the inbox being an IMAP
one?
> change the display of the folder index:
> macro index S ":set index_format
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:03:14AM -0700, Sam Peterson wrote:
> Try keeping your locale to en_US.ISO8859-1. I think, provided
> LC_CTYPE allows for 8-bits, you should be able to set $charset to
> something different from LC_CTYPE, without problems. At least, I'm
> able to do this with $charset=e
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:24:44PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > That is why I think it would be much better to have manual charset
> > override for headers, just like the one we have for bodies.
> > IMHO, this functionality should be implemented in MUA.
>
> this would only work around the proble
I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the second set
they are both replies to a message that is gone, so they are both tied
together in a tree,
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 19:03]:
> I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
> messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
> the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the second set
> they are both replies to a
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 19:03]:
> > I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
> > messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
> > the child message is a direct reply to the parent.
At 15:03 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
> messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
> the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the second set
> they are both
At 15:28 -0500 30 Aug 2002, I wrote:
> I'm not entirely convinced that I understand what you're saying, but
> does setting the hide_missing option help?
That should read "unsetting the hide_missing option". The option
is set by default.
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sch
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> At 15:28 -0500 30 Aug 2002, I wrote:
> > I'm not entirely convinced that I understand what you're saying, but
> > does setting the hide_missing option help?
>
> That should read "unsetting the hide_missing option". The option
> is set by default.
No,
At 16:40 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > That should read "unsetting the hide_missing option". The option
> > is set by default.
>
> No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
The hide_missing op
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
>
> The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
> either.
Really? I didn't know what hide_missing was, so I looked in the
manual and this is what it says:
h
At 17:03 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > > No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
> >
> > The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
> > either.
>
> Really? I didn't kn
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-30 17:03 -0400]:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > > No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
> >
> > The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
> > either.
>
> Really? I didn't know what
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:10:44AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>On Aug 29, Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
>> > you can always try but it has been my experience that these people
>> > don't want to change to anything other than M$. if yo
38 matches
Mail list logo
