Re: spamassassin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> When one does get through, I've been submitting it by hitting S in >>> the index, which pipes it to spamassassin -d. >> Why _on earth_ do you want to run SA with -

Re: spamassassin

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:37:26AM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote.. > > Yes, I'm aware of this. But still, somehow I feel, that the original > author didn't have this in his mind (correct me if I'm wrong, of > course). Although, maybe I'm trying to be too besserwisser here and > speculating thi

Re: spamassassin

On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:00:11PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote.. > > I press 'S' on a spam, which adds the From-header to this file formail > goes through everytime mail comes in, and if the address can be found > from this file, the mail gets /dev/nulled. It also adds a > "blacklist_from foo

Re: hook-list menu

On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:23:02PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > the distinction between bloat and feature > are usually subjective to one's preferences. > > i doubt that many users will use such a menu. > besides - what shall this menu offer? > > > Vikram - can you answer these questions fo

Re: spamassassin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:00:11PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote.. >> #!/bin/sh >> # >> # $Id: addspam.sh,v 1.5 2002/08/11 07:48:09 ekhowl Exp $ > > This looks like a pretty nifty solution. Well, dunno about

is list down ?

having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org Please DO NOT carbon me on replies to list, unless you are requesting duplicate responces.

Re: Mutt hanging on new message. [Solution enclosed!]

It's been a long, hard road, but we're here again. Recap of the problem: Mutt would work fine, except when trying to compose a new message, it would hang after entering subject. Cause of problem: set signature='~/.sig' Now, for the $1000 prize, what could be wrong with that that would cause m

language

I have just started to use mutt but I have one problem I am hoping I can get some help with. I do send quite a lot of e-mails in Swedish and I am not able to read the extra letters that the Swedish alphabet has. They show up as question marks. I have emacs as my editor and when I send mail t

Re: language

* Bytor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I have just started to use mutt but I have one problem I am hoping I can get some >help with. I do send quite a lot of e-mails in Swedish and I am not able to read the >extra letters that the Swedish alphabet has. They show up as question marks. I have >e

Re: is list down ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down? Seems to be working fine here... anyone else? - -- Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | <0x1410081E> -BEGI

[OT] Re: spamassassin

An off-topic query concerning spamassassin: Can it be set to delete spam automatically (I'm not so interested in just *marking* spam, because if it only marks spam I still have to sift through it), without getting too many false positives? I'm thinking of doing something about the 20+ spam messa

Re: [OT] Re: spamassassin

Philip Mak said: > An off-topic query concerning spamassassin: > > Can it be set to delete spam automatically (I'm not so interested in > just *marking* spam, because if it only marks spam I still have to sift > through it), without getting too many false positives? No. The next version of SA -

Re: is list down ?

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:32:03PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down? > > Seems to be working fine here... anyone else? > No problem her

Re: New mail notification problems

Sven Guckes wrote: > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-18 08:44]: > > What would make mutt not report that there is new mail when there is? > > Sometimes I will find that it indicates that there is > > no new mail, yet when I change to some folders, there is. > > i recall some problems

Re: [OT] Re: spamassassin

Michael Leone wrote: > Philip Mak said: >> An off-topic query concerning spamassassin: >> >> Can it be set to delete spam automatically (I'm not so interested in >> just *marking* spam, because if it only marks spam I still have to >> sift through it), without getting too many false positives? >

Re: New mail notification problems

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002, Michael Elkins wrote: > The only known issue (afaik) about Mutt *not* reporting new mail is > when the user has "unset mark_old" in their configuration. In this > case a message that would ordinarily be marked as old is still new, > but won't be detected with the file modifi

Re: [OT] Re: spamassassin

Will Yardley wrote: > I prefer not to delete anything - but I also receive spam reports and > stuff to my address occasionally, so I can't run the risk of > accidentally deleting one of those. I have the same experience. It's also useful to save your spam so that you can contribute back the repo

PGP & Outlook

I was wondering if something can't be done to fix the interaction between PGP/MIME and Outlook et al that refuse to show signed messages. They apparently know enough MIME to recognize that they can't handle "multipart/signed" and don't look inside for the text/plain part. I wonder if a separate u

Re: is list down ? - nope.

* Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-19 15:05]: > having seen NO traffic for 3 days, > have to wonder, ?? Is the list down? nope - looks fine. there are 31 mails within the last two days. Sven === --verbose: Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [31/45741] [NEW=39643] [~d <2d] 45368 N L 020818 Jussi

Re: New mail notification problems

* On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Michael Elkins wrote: > The only known issue (afaik) about Mutt *not* reporting new > mail is when the user has "unset mark_old" in their > configuration. In this case a message that would ordinarily be > marked as old is still new, but won't be detected with the file > mo

Re: New mail notification problems

* John Iverson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 08 19, 02 at 16:43: > * On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Michael Elkins wrote: > > > The only known issue (afaik) about Mutt *not* reporting new > > mail is when the user has "unset mark_old" in their > > configuration. In this case a message that would ordi

Re: hook-list menu - add/change/delete/move items?

* Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-19 13:11]: > The reason I am saying that this thing to be an added > functionality is that hooks and macros are quite a uniq features > of mutt and make it a highly customisable app. It would be > really a boon for people who experiment with these featur

Re: PGP & Outlook -> check-traditional-pgp + pgp_create_traditional

* Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-19 20:12]: > I was wondering if something can't be done to fix the interaction > between PGP/MIME and Outlook et al that refuse to show signed messages. yes - someone ought to tell the creators or outlook about RFC2015.. > They apparently know enough MIM

Re: New mail notification problems

* On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Mike Leone wrote: > I use Maildir with IMAP, and I see *no* new mail notifications > on the folders at all. When I open the mailbox (maildir), yes - > the index or pager shows new messages. But using the "c" > command to switch folders only ever shows the name of the > fold