Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Hi, * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? Thorsten -- In dem Augenblick, wo wir anfangen unsere Freiheitsrechte einzuschränken, besorgen wird das Geschäft der Terroristen. - Günter Grass msg27137/pgp0.pgp Descript

Re: NFS problems

Hi, * Aaron Schrab [04/14/02 01:20:38 CEST] wrote: > The patch shouldn't affect security in any way. Temporary files are > still overwritten, I just added a test for when the entire file has been > overwritten that will work properly on systems where the size returned > by the stat system call i

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: > * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: > I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? Must be you. Verified here. Cheers, Rocco. msg27139/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Hi, * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]: >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: >> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? >Must be you. Verified here. I can verify all other signatures, including yours.

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Hi, * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]: >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: >> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? >Must be you. Verified here. I cannot verify the following IDs (only checked Apr

PGP signature verification (was: Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem)

Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 13:12:18 CEST] wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]: > >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: > >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: > >> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? > >Must be you. Verifie

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Thorsten, et al -- ...and then Thorsten Haude said... % % Hi, Hello again! % % * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]: % >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: % >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: % >> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is i

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Thorsten, et al -- ...and then Thorsten Haude said... % % Hi, Hello! % % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: % I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? I imagine it's you, but I've seen the same thing. I thought it was a matter of signing/lsigning and a web of t

Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

David, * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-14 09.53 -0500]: Thorsten said: > % I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? And you replied: > I imagine it's you, but I've seen the same thing. I thought it was a > matter of signing/lsigning and a web of trust. Does verificatio

Newbie with mutt and fetchmail

Hi: I've installed fetchmail, it works, I've put it in the background as a process with the -d 30 arg, mutt seems to start up. The only way that I can read any messages in mutt designated to my ISP's mail server, is if I read the messages first with the mail command. What do I need to do in orde

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

David, On 04/13/02, 10:41:27PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a > reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that > will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you. Don't try mucking with it in vim > unless you only

Re: Newbie with mutt and fetchmail

begin Nick Lozinsky quotation: > > I've installed fetchmail, it works, I've put it in the background as a > process with the -d 30 arg, mutt seems to start up. The only way that > I can read any messages in mutt designated to my ISP's mail server, is > if I read the messages first with the mail

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Hi, * David T-G [04/14/02 16:54:58 CEST] wrote: > ...and then Thorsten Haude said... > % * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]: > % >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: > % >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: > % >> I cannot verify your signature. Is it

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Moin, * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 16:53]: I cannot verify this one. Thorsten -- Denn ein Tyrann ist nicht, wenn die Masse nicht geduldig stillhält. - Kurt Tucholsky msg27150/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PGP signature verification (was: Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem)

Hi, * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]: >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 13:12:18 CEST] wrote: >> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]: >> >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: >> >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]: >> >> I cannot verify your

List-hooks don't work

Hi, I use 'list-hooks' like this: send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Since I switched to 1.5.0, these things don't fire anymore. - - - Schnipp - - - Mutt 1.5.0i (2002-01-22) Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Michael R. Elkins und andere. Mutt übernimmt KEINERLEI GEWÄHRL

Strange Error while starting Editor

Hi, Since I started using 1.5.0, I occasionally get a weird error while starting my editor. I use NEdit via shell script: nedit -lm Mail -do 'insertSalutation()' -import ~/.mail/mudit.rc $@ Because NEdit is somewhat less well known than vi, I'll explain a bit: The first option (-lm) invokes

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]: > >Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your > >$pgp_verify_command look like? > gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --verify %s %f Except '--quiet' the same here. > As I sai

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 22:46]: >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: >> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]: >> >Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your >> >$pgp_verify_command look like? >> gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --

Re: Strange Error while starting Editor

Hi, * Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 22:07]: >Since I use Mutt 1.5.0, NEdit occasionally displays a number of error >dialogs which say: >Can't open macro file /etc/profile:ulimit:15: value exceeds hard >limit /home/yooden/.NEdit/macros/macro1.nm This might be interesting: Th

Re: S/MIME

Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/13/02 10:41:21 CEST] wrote: > I want to get a better picture about S/MIME, but can't find an > introduction in the net. Could one of you point me to a S/MIME > introduction or tutorial that is written for the user? The "Linux Security HowTo" just points to one of Netscap

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 23:06]: I cannot verify this one. I can still verify my other mails. Thorsten -- I've been accused of vulgarity. I say that's bullshit. - Mel Brooks msg27158/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 23:06:03 CEST] wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 22:46]: > >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: > >> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]: > >> >Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your > >> >$pgp_verify_command

Re: S/MIME

Hi, * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 22:56]: >* Thorsten Haude [04/13/02 10:41:21 CEST] wrote: >> I want to get a better picture about S/MIME, but can't find an >> introduction in the net. Could one of you point me to a S/MIME >> introduction or tutorial that is written for the user? >

Re: S/MIME

Thorsten Haude wrote: > Yes, that gives a nice introduction and good pointers to technical > documents (which I may need if I ever get around to get my filter > really aware of the different formats). > I would still like to read something about the key infrastructure. > Example: If I get a mail

PGP signature verification (was: Outlook pst import: What file formatshould I use?: Formail problem)

Hello Thorsten, On Sunday, April 14, 2002 at 1:12:18 PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: > I cannot verify the following IDs (only checked April): > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Strange: I can verify OK those 2 mails, but can't verify 4 others (gpg:

Re: ugly thread tree display

Hello Luke, On Friday, April 12, 2002 at 3:39:03 PM +0100, Luke Ross wrote: [graphic versus ascii thread tree] > If under cygwin, force mutt to run under code page 437 Could you please elaborate this one? I was never able to get Latin-1 characters *and* graphic tree at the same time un

Re: PGP signature verification

At 21:15 +0200 14 Apr 2002, Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But in other cases, he has not done it. In the last 3 mails (the > first mail is not QP encoded, so it's normal) some dots *not* beginning > a line were rejected at beginning of next one, because of QP soft > cutting long lin

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 23:35]: >> Remember also that I have only problems with >> David's mail. He's industrious, so it may be luck. >Hmm, so let's wait if David (or someone else) has some >pointers or ideas. David is not the culprit, see my other mail. >I can't verify

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 00:41]: >I cannot verify (April only): With neither 1.5.0 nor 1.3.27 (except for S/MIME of course). Thorsten -- Alles ist richtig, auch das Gegenteil. - Kurt Tucholsky msg27166/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 00:38]: Add this one to the list I just can't verify. I cannot find any suspicious dots here. Thorsten -- Death to all fanatics! msg27167/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: S/MIME

Hi, * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 23:44]: >s/mime sigs usually include the key itself along with the signature >(which is why s/mime signed mails are so rediculously large). That doesn't sound as if you were a friend of these. Since I saw a few using S/MIME in this list, what might

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/15/02 00:53:17 CEST] wrote: > * Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 00:41]: > >I cannot verify (April only): > With neither 1.5.0 nor 1.3.27 (except for S/MIME of course). Exactly. But only checking David's. > -- > Alles ist richtig, auch das Gegenteil. >

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Alain Bench [04/14/02 21:15:34 CEST] wrote: > Hello Thorsten, > On Sunday, April 14, 2002 at 1:12:18 PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: > > I cannot verify the following IDs (only checked April): > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Strange:

/var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

When I started mutt after a new install I get /var/spool/mail/ is not a mailbox. I've never seen such a thing. So I ran fetchmail and it created /var/spool/mail/ and downloaded my pop messages and still when I run mutt I get /var/spool/mail... is not a mailbox. why out of the blue would mutt do

Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

What do you get with: file /var/spool/mail/ I get: /var/spool/mail/jlh: mail text Joel On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:45:06PM -0300, skidley wrote: > When I started mutt after a new install I get /var/spool/mail/ is not a mailbox. I've never seen such a thing. So I ran fetchmail and it created /var/

Re: PGP signature verification

begin Thorsten Haude quotation: > > * Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 00:38]: > Add this one to the list I just can't verify. I cannot find any > suspicious dots here. Can you quote the headers from one you can't verify? I want to see what path it's taking to get to you, perhaps the

Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

I can duplicate your problem if I put some garbage like as the first line of my mail box file. That is, file reports a mail box but mutt complains it is not. Joel On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 09:17:23PM -0300, skidley wrote: > Joel Hammer wrote: > > >What do you get with: > >file /var/spool/mail/

Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

Hi, * skidley [04/15/02 01:45:06 CEST] wrote: It would be nice if you could wrap your lines at somewhat around 70 characters/line. > When I started mutt after a new install I get > /var/spool/mail/ is not a mailbox. I've never > seen such a thing. So I ran fetchmail and it created > /var/spool/

Re: S/MIME

begin Thorsten Haude quotation: > > using S/MIME in this list, what might have been their reason? Is > S/MIME better established with non-free software? Exactly. -- Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support: http://www.eiv.com | 1) There's more than one

Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * skidley [04/15/02 01:45:06 CEST] wrote: > > It would be nice if you could wrap your lines at somewhat > around 70 characters/line. > > > > > This is quite simple: as default, your spoolbox in /var/mail > is of type mbox. The mbox format defines that mails are t

Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

Skidley -- ...and then skidley said... % % absolutely horrendous. How can I fix this??? Probably by removing the blank line at the top of your spool file that somehow got there and which makes the mailbox no longer an mbox. We get this sort of question a lot; I bet it would be easy to find

2 questions

Hi, I have two questions and hope someone can help. 1) folder-hooks are executed when entering a folder. What I'd like to have is a macro automatically executed after the scores are applied to messages and after sorting. Background: For newsgroups I have a couple of scoring rules app