Tom Foster muttered:
> I would like to bind say, shift + g to use my own script (which
> fetches and sorts my mail...)
>
> How might I go about this?
macro index G ~/bin/yourscript "yourscript"
HTH,
Michael
--
There are no threads in a.b.p.erotica, so there's no gain in using a
threaded new
Hey Guys,
Thanks for the keybinding. Works like a charm. Now, onto the
good ole folder hook problem...
I'd like a different sig and "from" line, depending on what
folder I'm in when I reply or send. I thought I would make
mutt read another config file depending on the folder, but the
line I h
Tom Foster [mutt-users] <24/07/01 09:31 -0400>:
> I'd like a different sig and "from" line, depending on what
> folder I'm in when I reply or send. I thought I would make
> mutt read another config file depending on the folder, but the
> line I have does not do a thing.
Use folder hooks.
> f
on Tue,24 Jul 2001, Tom Foster wrote:
> I'd like a different sig and "from" line, depending on what
> folder I'm in when I reply or send.
See the following for setting up profiles:
http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/~mara/mutt/profiles.html
--
Whether you believe you can, or whether you believe yo
Hello everyone.
I`ve been forced to downgrade from mutt 1.3.19 to mutt 1.2.5 since I
installed Slackware 8.0, I keep getting the following error with
ncurses:
checking for waddnwstr in -lncurses... no
checking for waddnwstr in -lncursesw... no
checking for initscr in -lncurses... no
checking for
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I`ve been forced to downgrade from mutt 1.3.19 to mutt 1.2.5 since I
> installed Slackware 8.0, I keep getting the following error with
> ncurses:
look at the config.log file, which shows the error messages. Perhaps
sl80's got
Okay, okay, I accept, that pod2man from perl 5.0 uses other parameters
than the one from 5.6 :-(
lbdb (0.25.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Add ">" to pod2man call in Makefile, because older versions of perl
come with a pod2man which dies otherwise.
-- Roland Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tu
* On Tue Jul 24, Thomas E. Dickey wrote in [mutt-users]:
-> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
->
-> > Hello everyone.
-> >
-> > I`ve been forced to downgrade from mutt 1.3.19 to mutt 1.2.5 since I
-> > installed Slackware 8.0, I keep getting the following error with
-> > ncurses:
->
> I did`nt find anything in my config.log, but then again, I`m fairly
> ignorant on these kind of things. I was wondering if someone could check
> it out. Attached is the config.log, sorry if it bothers anybody, this is
> the first and last time I attached an unrequested file.
> It was created
* On [010717 14:50] Fox Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> finally i have got mutt working with fetchmail and procmail. I am really
> happy. I have a few questions, and basically want to know if i am doing
> things the right way.
>
You ought ot set your editor to wrap lines at less than 80 char
* On Tue Jul 24, Lars Hecking wrote in [mutt-users]:
->
-> > I did`nt find anything in my config.log, but then again, I`m fairly
-> > ignorant on these kind of things. I was wondering if someone could check
-> > it out. Attached is the config.log, sorry if it bothers anybody, this is
-> > the f
> Thanks a lot, as you can see it worked:
>
> [nelsong:~]$ mutt -v
> Mutt 1.3.19i (2001-06-07)
> System: Linux 2.4.5 [using ncurses 5.2]
>
> Is that problem with autoconf 2.50 in general or just the one that`s
> shipping with slackware?
autoconf 2.5x is not fully backwards compatible. I have
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
> Is that problem with autoconf 2.50 in general or just the one that`s
> shipping with slackware?
in general (2.51 is worse - they've succumbed to featuritis).
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
yes - this is one of the places where autoconf 2.5x breaks lots of configure
scripts (it breaks the ability to check the existence of a given function
in one of several possible libraries). If I happen to see a 2.5x that's
stable long enough to bother, I'll add this fix to my autoconf patches - f
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 03:04:32PM +0200 or thereabouts, Lawrence Mitchell or somebody
saying they were Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
> * On [010717 14:50] Fox Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > finally i have got mutt working with fetchmail and procmail. I am really
>
> > Now when i start mutt,
* Chuck Fender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11:39 25/07/01]:
> mutt -y gives the perfect display for deciding which mailbox to read
> next. Is it possible to get there without exitting and restarting. c
> lists too many other things in my ~/mail folder.
hi..
yes, you can get to it by pressing c? followed
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:48:53PM -0600, Chuck Fender wrote:
> mutt -y gives the perfect display for deciding which mailbox to read
> next. Is it possible to get there without exitting and restarting. c
> lists too many other things in my ~/mail folder.
'c' should give you the same display as '
* Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11:55 25/07/01]:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:48:53PM -0600, Chuck Fender wrote:
>
> > mutt -y gives the perfect display for deciding which mailbox to read
> > next. Is it possible to get there without exitting and restarting. c
> > lists too many other things
Ankit Mohan [mutt-users] <25/07/01 12:08 +0530>:
> Mail-Followup-To: Chuck Fender , MUTT Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> isnt that an incomplete mail address? When i replied to the list using the
That's because Chuck is sending out mail as just without any domain
name added - and his MTA (sendmail
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:08:54PM +0530, Ankit Mohan wrote:
> * Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11:55 25/07/01]:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:48:53PM -0600, Chuck Fender wrote:
> >
> > > mutt -y gives the perfect display for deciding which mailbox to read
> > > next. Is it possible to get th
20 matches
Mail list logo
