On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:08:54PM +0530, Ankit Mohan wrote:
> * Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11:55 25/07/01]:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:48:53PM -0600, Chuck Fender wrote:
> >
> > > mutt -y gives the perfect display for deciding which mailbox to read
> > > next. Is it possible to get there without exitting and restarting. c
> > > lists too many other things in my ~/mail folder.
> >
>
> i was noticing chuch's header, and in the followup field was something like
> this:
>
> Mail-Followup-To: Chuck Fender <chuck>, MUTT Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> isnt that an incomplete mail address? When i replied to the list using the
> 'L' key, it tried to send a cc to user named chuck on my system, which
> obviously wasnt there. on the other hand, in this mail i see that the mail
> followup has been corrected to :
>
> Mail-Followup-To: MUTT Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Chuck Fender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> so gary, did you correct that mail address yourself, or did it happen
> automatically?
That address is wrong, too; there is no "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
The address was changed automatically, and although I think I know
where, I don't know how or why.
When I replied to the list, I saw that it was also cc'ing to Chuck, but
I didn't pay any attention to the address. A moment later, I got one of
those "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" messages from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] because there is no user "chuck"
at msgbas2.cos.agilent.com. Then I looked at his header.
The Mail-Followup-To field that I see in his header is
Mail-Followup-To: Chuck Fender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, MUTT Users
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is strangely different from the one you see. Looking at the rest
of the header, I see in part:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from msgbas2.cos.agilent.com (msgbas2.cos.agilent.com
[192.168.148.34]) by esp1.spk.agilent.com (Postfix)
with SMTP id 97CB1F48D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from agent57.gbnet.net (agent57.gbnet.net [194.70.126.12])
by msgbas2.cos.agilent.com (Postfix)
with SMTP id 079D35E9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 25 Jul 2001 01:55:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 1464 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 05:54:09 -0000
Received: from ns.gbnet.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by agent57.gbnet.net with SMTP; 25 Jul 2001 05:54:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 22425 invoked by uid 610); 25 Jul 2001 05:53:05 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 22415 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 05:52:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jupiter.wazoo.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ns.gbnet.net with SMTP; 25 Jul 2001 05:52:59 -0000
Received: (from chuck@localhost)
by jupiter.wazoo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id XAA14967;
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:48:53 -0600
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:48:53 -0600
From: Chuck Fender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So, as the message travelled from the list server to me, the Postfix
program at msgbas2.cos.agilent.com apparently decided to rewrite the
Mail-Followup-To field. As I said, I don't know why. Maybe some
Postfix expert here can answer this.
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Spokane, Washington, USA
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |
