On 2001-02-27 19:58:55 +, Chris Green wrote:
> I have tried setting LC_CYTPE (and LANG) but it doesn't have any
> effect. Anyway if the mail is correctly displayed by other
> programs surely I have LC_CTYE set correctly.
> For example if I just 'cat ' I get the correct chacters
> displa
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:37:17AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2001-02-27 19:58:55 +, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > I have tried setting LC_CYTPE (and LANG) but it doesn't have any
> > effect. Anyway if the mail is correctly displayed by other
> > programs surely I have LC_CTYE set correct
Dirk Laurie wrote:
> signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
> gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or
>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:13:19AM -0500, Justin R. Miller allegedly said:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone have a fix for this?
>
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/justin/mutt-1.3.16/doc'
> test -f manual.html || make manual.html || cp ./manual*.html ./
> test -f manual.txt || make manua
Jürgen Salk wrote:
> Yes, I have intentionally used overlength lines, such
> that you can check it out. Have fun.
Ahem, this bloody damned web interface, I'm using right
now, seems to have it's own idea of breaking lines. :-)
Regards - Juergen.
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.
how do you do this
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:02:11AM +0100, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered:
| *[Dirk Laurie on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200]:
|
| > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
| > printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line br
Yeah. It was the order. I just tossed them at the top, and it worked
like a f'ing charm.
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 10:32:50PM +, John P. Verel muttered:
| On 02/25/01, 01:14:23PM -0800, Jason Helfman wrote:
| > I tried to get this answered before but haven't found an answer, nor am
| > I am abl
On 2001-02-28 02:13:19 -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Anyone have a fix for this?
It's just a missing file which I posted to mutt-dev immediately
after the first one noticed. Here it is again.
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This message may have been certified
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:24:26AM + or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Brian Galbraith thought:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:13:19AM -0500, Justin R. Miller allegedly said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone have a fix for this?
> >
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/justin/mutt-1.3.16/doc'
>
Jürgen Salk skryf:
> Dirk Laurie wrote:
>
> > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
> printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
> > gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
> viewer-formatted version instead of t
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> Jürgen Salk skryf:
> > Dirk Laurie wrote:
> >
> > > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
> > printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
> > > gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mu
Dirk Laurie wrote:
> The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">"
> has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
> to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended.
I understand quite exactly what you want.
Just try this "gqG" thing with vi
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
> break long lines into screen-width lines. I dare not complain for they
> will then send me HTML or Word versions. The mutt viewer handles the
> long lines nicely
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:55:11PM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> >
> The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">"
> has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
> to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended.
Check your comments and fo
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001, Jürgen Salk wrote:
> If you edit your mails with vim, you can easily reformat the quoted
> lines by the "gq{motion}" command. E.g. "gqj" will format the
> current line and places the cursor in the next line. Then proceed
> with the "." command. Or just type "gqG" which will r
On 2001.02.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dirk Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">"
> has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
> to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended.
The
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:49:03AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> On 2001.02.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Dirk Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">"
> > has already been prepended to the line.
>
> Try using "p
Try this:
set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 comments=nb:>'"
-Justin
Thus spake Dirk Laurie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> J?rgen Salk skryf:
> > Dirk Laurie wrote:
> >
> > > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
> > printing or quoting (in a reply) these conveni
I realize this is drifting from the original question, but setting
textwidth=77 in vim will activate word-wrapping as you compose the
message (wraps at 77 chars in this case). This feature is useful if
you compose in a wide terminal, or if you're tired of hitting
at the end of each line...
Zac
Hello,
Does anyone know of a way to hilite rows in the message index that
correspond to messages that are addressed to me, and are new? In
other words, I'm always looking for "N +" in %Z (the message status
flags), and I'd like to make that visual search easier. I don't filter
my email, and I o
* On Wed Feb 28 2001, Zach Thompson screamed:
-> Hello,
->
-> Does anyone know of a way to hilite rows in the message index that
-> correspond to messages that are addressed to me, and are new? In
-> other words, I'm always looking for "N +" in %Z (the message status
-> flags), and I'd like to m
* Zach Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010228 21:45]:
> Does anyone know of a way to hilite rows in the message index that
> correspond to messages that are addressed to me, and are new? In
> other words, I'm always looking for "N +" in %Z (the message status
> flags), and I'd like to make that vi
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:15:16PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Suppose someone send mail from account "debian" from "localhost"
> and I recieve it here in account "debian" on "localhost", it
> showup as if it came from myself in my Mutt.
>
> Is there any good way to avoid this?
>
> Any suggestion
Hi...
I'm currently subscribed to various mailing lists that include the
messages as "attachments" -- so it's trivial to reply to an single
message/thread. However, the mutt-users-digest "includes" all the
messages into one message. How do you guys get around this? It's a real
PITA, IMHO. I've co
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:43:25PM -0800, Zach Thompson wrote:
>Does anyone know of a way to hilite rows in the message index
>that correspond to messages that are addressed to me, and are
>new? In other words, I'm always looking for "N +" in %Z (the
>message status flags), and I'd like to make t
* Christian R Molls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010228 22:04]:
...talking to myself...
> * Zach Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010228 21:45]:
> > Does anyone know of a way to hilite rows in the message index that
> > correspond to messages that are addressed to me, and are new? In
> > other words, I'm
Thanks to all for the great info. Combining elements of your responses I came
up with:
color index cyandefault '~p ~N'
to do exactly what I want. And now I'm armed with all sorts of new
possibilities!
I said:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know of a way to hilite rows in the
* Duke Normandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010228 22:19]:
> I'm currently subscribed to various mailing lists that include the
> messages as "attachments" -- so it's trivial to reply to an single
> message/thread. However, the mutt-users-digest "includes" all the
> messages into one message. How do yo
I usually read my mail sorted by threads. Once in a while (on some lists
the while is pretty short), threading breaks because some moron hit
the "Reply"-Button not to reply but to compose a message completely
unrelated to the one he is replying to. His messages and the replies to
it subsequently
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:17:06AM +0100, Thomas Roessler allegedly said:
>
> It's just a missing file which I posted to mutt-dev immediately
> after the first one noticed. Here it is again.
>
Thanksthat did it.
Regards
Brian
--
Brian Galbraith [ Mutt 1.3.16i]| GnuPG 1.0.4d | SuSE Lin
Jeff Abrahamson proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:15:16PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Suppose someone send mail from account "debian" from "localhost"
> > and I recieve it here in account "debian" on "localhost", it
> > showup as if it came from myself in my Mutt.
> >
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:57:33AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Jed is a very good editor that has a mail_mode that does smart
>formatting of quoted paragraphs. No more ">" characters in the
>middle of lines.
I've always been a big fan of GNUEmacs, and text mode has ">" quoting
reformatting c
32 matches
Mail list logo
