David Alban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2000:
> Sure does. Interesting. I didn't think the "^From " line *was* a
> header. :-)
Technically it isn't, it's part of the mbox folder format... But I
guess Mutt does treat it that way, if it's present.
The "^From " trick will only work
Hi list,
I use
'mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f -print | \
grep -Ev '(log|backup|sent)' | xargs`'
to tell Mutt about my mailboxes. One of them is not found though. It is
displayed if I enter the find command in a shell, GKrellM checks it
perfectly, but Mutt ignores it.
What is wrong?
tia
Thors
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 07:16:32PM -0800, David Alban wrote:
> At 2000/11/08/20:18 -0500 Jim Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > save-hook '~h "^From some-list-owner@"' =some-list
> >
> > (where ~h is in the headers somewhere) should also work, although I
> > don't know if it works on 0.95 (which
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 04:14:24PM -0800, Robert Sweet wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:32:02AM -0800, Robert Sweet wrote:
[snip...]
> What about cc: to the poster too?
If the poster is subscribed to the list, s/he probably doesn't want to
receive two copies of the mail; your (L)ist reply wi
I haven't specified $folder at all in my muttrc, so it defaults to
~/Mail. I tried removing the `=' but without success.
Nasty thing it is...
--
Wouter Verheijen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2000:
> I haven't specified $folder at all in my muttrc, so it defaults to
> ~/Mail. I tried removing the `=' but without success.
> Nasty thing it is...
Hmm, ok. Strange.
Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does
folder-h
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:13:55PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does
>
> folder-hook . set sort=threads
No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although
putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set asdf) gives me an error
message
Wouter Verheijen muttered:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:13:55PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does
> >
> > folder-hook . set sort=threads
> No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although
> putting some garbage (like folder-hoo
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
> > folder-hook . set sort=threads
> No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although
> putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set asdf) gives me an error
> message.
> It looks like the sort command doesn't do anyth
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons
to read:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
> > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate
> > this feature. How does it work?
> > TIA Erwin
>
> Did
Hello,
I've been looking for this in the manual and haven't found anything
appropriate so here goes
I have certain lists that I'm subscribed to (via listserv) that has
the Reply-To: set automatically back to the list and not the sender.
When I hit 's' to save a message from these lists mutt
Greg Whitlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
> Actually, the whole Reply-To: point may be a red herring but it's the
> only difference I see right off between the lists. Any ideas on how to
> get those messages to save like (what I view as) normal? I didn't see
> a way to do it w
Greg,
At 2000/11/09/15:28 -0500 Greg Whitlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't see
> a way to do it with save-hook but it could be that I just don't know how.
Do you mean "is there a save-hook definition I can use to get these
messag
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Well, the hook is executing, if you get the error.
> I would try what was suggested in the other mail, create a minimal
> .muttrc and try to get it work with that.
Yes the hook is executing. But I'm guessing he has another hook th
Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000:
> I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to
> show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no folder
> ever gets a 'N' flag, regardless of whether or not it contains new
> messages. Shouldn't this work righ
i> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Nov
09, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0800
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> I
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Wouter Verheijen wrote:
> Right! This was exactly what I had. Thanks.
> I assumed that the dot was just the default, which gets executed when
> there was no other match.
> It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important.
> Maybe this
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
> It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important.
> Maybe this should be added?
Well, order is significant for more or less all hooks. I don't remember
if this is stated anywhere in the manual specifically, if
Hi all. In mutt 1.2.5i, I'm trying to set the following in my .muttrc:
set record=+SENT-MAIL
folder-hook . set sort=threads \
index_format="%3C/%m %Z %{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M} %-15.15F %s"
folder-hook SENT-MAIL set sort=to \
index_format="%3C/%m %Z %{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M} %-15.15t %
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 12:49:57AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
>> It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important.
>> Maybe this should be added?
>
>Well, order is significant for more or less all hooks. I don
Jeff Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
> folder-hook . set sort=threads \
> index_format="%3C/%m %Z %{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M} %-15.15F %s"
> Which gives me a startup error '%Z: unknown variable'
This is a quoting issue. Put '' quotes around the whole
'index_form
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:19:16AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Jeff Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000:
> > folder-hook . set sort=threads \
> > index_format="%3C/%m %Z %{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M} %-15.15F %s"
>
> > Which gives me a startup error '%Z: unknown variable'
>
>
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:42:35PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000:
> > I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to
> > show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no folder
> > ever gets a 'N' flag, regardles
* Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:42:35PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000:
> > > I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to
> > > show me which folders have new messages. For some r
24 matches
Mail list logo
