On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 02:52:02AM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
> Why do I get this warning as part of the PGP output of every single
> signed message on this list (except my own)?
>
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that th
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:42:51PM -0500, Cory Phillips wrote:
> How do I move a message from one folder to another?
>
> I know message are moved to my read-mail folder from the inbox
> after I have read them, but what about specifying a target
> folder other than the default?
>
> I know I can d
As the author points out:
"All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less."
If you want something better, make it.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 01:00:01PM -0700, Myrddin muttered:
| Jens Askengren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
| > Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI.
This is true, but blind signing of public keys is not
recommended. Unless you are really sure that the message
and key come from the purported sender, you could be signing
a fraudulent key.
The PGP/GPG model is that of a web of trust, built up over
time. With a list as geographically diverse as
barry angell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 24 Sep 2000:
> I seem to have made a big jump from yahoo web mail to
> Mutt/Linux.
For the better, IMHO. :-)
> I would have preferred an Xwindows based
> client, because I sometimes receive HTML mail, and very
> often receive web links in email that
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:32:12PM -0700, barry angell wrote:
> This is true, but blind signing of public keys is not
> recommended. Unless you are really sure that the message
> and key come from the purported sender, you could be signing
> a fraudulent key.
True. I should have cautioned people
Thanks for the replies.
mutt -y with mailboxes `echo/$HOME/Mail/*` works fine. thanks Ashton.
--
russ
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 03:50:51AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> barry angell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 24 Sep 2000:
> > I would have preferred an Xwindows based
> > client, because I sometimes receive HTML mail, and very
> > often receive web links in email that I want to immediately
> >
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 06:46:20PM -0700, barry angell wrote:
> This works well. I have urlview 0.7, which seems to work
> fine. I notice that 0.9 is the latest, but don't know if I
> need to upgrade.
FYI you probably want to apply this patch to 0.9:
http://ben.reser.org/projects/urlview-comma.
Była godzina 12:44:04 w sobota 23 wrzesień, gdy do autobusu wsiadł kanar
i wrzasnął:"David Champion!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
> A few years ago, I was tired of my frustrations with MH, elm, and
> Columbia mm, and I hated Pine.
[...]
> I was in the planning stages, and had
10 matches
Mail list logo
