Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > As of RFC 821 the local part of an e-mail address > can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see > local-part and quoted-string). > > It seems though, that

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:23:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > As of RFC 821 the local part of an e-mail address > > can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

Magnus Bodin muttered: > > As of RFC 821 the local part of an e-mail address > can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see > local-part and quoted-string). > > It seems though, that the mutt client does not support the use of an address > l

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Magnus Bodin muttered: > > > > As of RFC 821 the local part of an e-mail address > > can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see > > local-part and quoted-string). > > > > It

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:23:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > It seems though, that the mutt client does not supp

Re: Mutt not following RFC822 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:43:28AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:23:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wro

Re: browsing imap folders, and other questions

On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:17:56PM -0700, Mark D. Anderson wrote: ...[snip]... > > > > I apologize; I got off-track. What I meant to say is: > > > > then enter an IMAP server spec: e.g., {imap.demo.int/ssl} > > > > That will put you into browse mode on that IMAP path. > > > > -- > > -D. [EM

1.2 slower than 1.0 over NFS

We are currently using mutt-1.0i on solaris 2.6. I would like to upgrade to 1.2.4 but it is a _lot_ slower than 1.0 when reading my mailbox over NFS. Compiling with --disable-fcntl helps, but that doesn't seem to be recommended according to the FAQ on www.mutt.org. The same FAQ also claims that th

Re: gzip patch with maildir

2000-07-09-01:10:51 Ronny Haryanto: > [...] And for archives I don't think there's any advantage of > using maildir over mbox, which loads faster. [...] In the context of a discussion of the compressed folders patch, I don't disagree with your statement, but taken in isolation I'd have to disagre

Re: Fcc'ing to sent...

Jason -- ...and then Jason Helfman said... % % set record=+sent/ ... % % I have all the folders working, however, postponed and sent still seem % to be actually files, not in the folder Maildir format that I am seeing % now. Try either removing your sent file and creating a sent maildir or spe

Re: 1.2 slower than 1.0 over NFS

On 2000-07-10 17:59:31 +0200, Ives Aerts wrote: > We are currently using mutt-1.0i on solaris 2.6. I > would like to upgrade to 1.2.4 but it is a _lot_ slower > than 1.0 when reading my mailbox over NFS. Compiling > with --disable-fcntl helps, but that doesn't seem to be > recommended according t

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:37:11PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > > Magnus Bodin muttered: > > > > > > As of RFC 821 the local part of an e-mail address > > > can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and sh

keymaps header file

Hey guys. I'm rebuilding mutt-1.2i, and I'm having a problem that I don't think I had before. Making all in charmaps No suffix list. For charmap support, please read INSTALL cd . \ && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status creating Makefile link

Re: keymaps header file

Michael -- ...and then Michael Soulier said... % Hey guys. I'm rebuilding mutt-1.2i, and I'm having a problem that I don't % think I had before. You probably did, but may not have noticed. % ... % keymap.h:112: keymap_defs.h: No such file or directory % *** Error exit code 1 % %

Re: keymaps header file

That appears to have done it. Thanks. Mike On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 02:24:53PM -0400, David T-G wrote: > Michael -- > > ...and then Michael Soulier said... > % Hey guys. I'm rebuilding mutt-1.2i, and I'm having a problem that I don't > % think I had before. > > You probabl

autoconf version

Hey guys. So 1.2i is building, but I just tried 1.2.4i for the hell of it, and I got this. [bmerh56e-pegctrl-mutt-1.2.4]$ make cd . && aclocal -I m4 cd . && autoheader /opt/corp/unsupported/bin/autoheader: Symbol `PROTOTYPES' is not covered by /opt/corp/unsupported/share/a

Mutt-1.2.4i Fails to Find PGP5 Keys

I'm trying to upgrade to 1.2.4, but there's a problem with encrypting mail with PGP 5. Let's say I've written a message to "recipient@fqdomain". After I enter "p" in the Compose menu, and then "e" for encrypt, I see the message: "Looking for keys matching "recipient@fqdomain"... for a few

Re: keymaps header file

Hello Michael! On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Michael Soulier wrote: > Hey guys. I'm rebuilding mutt-1.2i, and I'm having a problem that I don't > think I had before. [...] > keymap.h:112: keymap_defs.h: No such file or directory > *** Error exit code 1 > > Is this header part of the sour