On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 11:09:34PM -0300, thus spake Richard Spencer:
> can I place instructions in the .muttrc
> file to check two pop3 mailboxes?
>
> --
No, they go in your .fetchmailrc. Mutt only plays with email
once it is delivered.
For a really good start-you-
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 08:37:21PM -0300, thus spake Richard Spencer:
> created a .fetchmailrc like this...
>
> poll pop3.uol.com.br proto pop3
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass secret1
> fetchall keep
> poll pop.a001.sprintmail.com proto pop3
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass secret2
> fe
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 01:21:50AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Perhaps. I'm using 1.2. I don't remember when that was introduced.
in 1.1.11 it's also s and S ...
--
Christian Ordig | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/
Germany |eMail: Chris
Hi all,
Two short config questions:
- I have put "ignore (blabla)" into my .muttrc in order to keep the visible part of
the headers in incoming mail readable, but now I would like to sort the different
lines, too. Is this possible?
For example, right now most incoming messages show me the dat
On 2000.05.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Manuel Arriaga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Two short config questions:
>
> - I have put "ignore (blabla)" into my .muttrc in order to keep the visible part of
>the headers in incoming mail readable, but now I would like to sort the d
Friday den 26.05.2000 um 13:12 CEST +0200, schrieb Manuel Arriaga:
> Hi all,
>
> Two short config questions:
>
> - I have put "ignore (blabla)" into my .muttrc in order to keep
> the visible part of the headers in incoming mail readable, but
> now I would like to sort the different lines, too.
Hi, folks --
...and then David DeSimone said...
% Kristin Anne Igaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% >
% > I would very much like to use one instance of Mutt to get all my mail.
% > However, I have 3 mail accounts on 3 different servers, 3 usernames, 3
%
% I believe Mutt supports the following syn
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 12:51:09AM +, Tom Gilbert wrote:
-> * Jacob Davies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-> > in my .muttrc. They all work OK, but the interface for dealing with multiple
-> > mailboxes in mutt doesn't seem that great. As I understand it, I will get
-> > notification that I have
> Timothy Ball:
> I haven't gotten any mail from the mailing list in weeks now... I am I
> unsubscribed or what?
i've been unsubbed for bounces. had to resubscribe. happens often these
days.
--
clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi David,
> > - I have put "ignore (blabla)" into my .muttrc in order to keep the visible part
>of the headers in incoming mail readable, but now I would like to sort the different
>lines, too. Is this possible?
>
> Read the manual regarding the hdr_order directive.
Thanks, now they look as I
Hi Frank,
Thanks, setting alternates to my own address got the Fcc: mailbox to automatically
show the recipient.
Cheers,
Manuel
> >
> > - Is it possible to set up your Fcc: mailbox (in my case
> > Mail/Sent) so that it displays the messages recipiend in the
> > index, instead of the sender (
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Do mutt and IMAP support
>
> {user:pass@hostname:port}folder
>
>instead? Of course, leaving your password(s) in your muttrc is probably
>not a Good Thing (tm) anyway...
I haven't tried it but there is no reason why not. And re leaving your
password i
The Short:
I notice that when I 'resend-message' (e) that it doesn't get
copied to my 'sent' folder.
The Long:
I'm a bad typist. Sometimes I mistype an address and send the
mail off. I get the bounce message.
Crack open mutt (v1.2) on my 'sent' folder where copies of all my
emails go. I find
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 10:35:16PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
-> David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
->
-> >Do mutt and IMAP support
-> >
-> > {user:pass@hostname:port}folder
-> >
-> >instead? Of course, leaving your password(s) in your muttrc is probably
-> >not a Good Thing (t
Since I upgraded to mutt 1.2, I haven't been able to get my
f1 help macros to work. These used to work for me:
# Show documentation when pressing F1
macro generic "!less /usr/doc/mutt-1.0i/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt documentation"
macro index"!less /usr/doc/mutt-1.0i/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt
Charles Curley proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Not necessarily. Your email server password may be different from your
>login password. Mine are. You can, however, give only the user permission
>to read or write to the two files, probably a good idea in general. An
>other things we all know and d
-kevin- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 26 May 2000:
> I notice that when I 'resend-message' (e) that it doesn't get
> copied to my 'sent' folder.
I think that this is only because resend-message doesn't fill the Fcc
header by default. If you add a folder in there, it'll work...
But yes, ther
Thus spake Hardy Merrill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Since I upgraded to mutt 1.2, I haven't been able to get my
> f1 help macros to work. These used to work for me:
>
> # Show documentation when pressing F1
> macro generic "!less /usr/doc/mutt-1.0i/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt documentation"
> macro i
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 02:24:34PM -0400 or thereabouts, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> Since I upgraded to mutt 1.2, I haven't been able to get my
> # Show documentation when pressing F1
> macro generic "!less /usr/doc/mutt-1.0i/manual.txt\n"
Telsa Gwynne [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 02:24:34PM -0400 or thereabouts, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> > Since I upgraded to mutt 1.2, I haven't been able to get my
>
> > # Show documentation when pressing F1
> > macro generic "!less /usr/doc/mutt
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To answer the original question: For mutt, no such thing
> as a file extension exists when it looks at how to
> interpret incoming data.
well, but attachments have a comment field or something
because i can see the name of the file being sent.
it also
David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe the original poster (I forgot who...) would be OK with
> "unbind * *" and "unmacro * *".
But there is no "unbind" nor "unmacro" command...
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there
On 2000.05.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David DeSimone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the original poster (I forgot who...) would be OK with
> > "unbind * *" and "unmacro * *".
>
> But there is no "unbind" nor "unmacro" command...
I
Carlos Puchol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> well, but attachments have a comment field or something
> because i can see the name of the file being sent.
That's just a filename. MIME attachments also have a "Content-Type"
header which is supposed to tell the MUA exactly what type of document
is
Both of these revolve around the use of sig-dashes.
First, I have a corrspondent who (despite protests) uses the ``-- ``
sequence to separate his message from the text he is replying to.
Needless to say, this causes mutt to syntax hilight the first
paragraph of his reply as a signature. Perhaps
At 5:00 PM EDT on May 26 Anton Graham sent off:
> Both of these revolve around the use of sig-dashes.
>
> First, I have a corrspondent who (despite protests) uses the ``-- ``
> sequence to separate his message from the text he is replying to.
Sounds pretty perverse. Maybe you could convince hi
At 5:02 PM EDT on May 26 Rob Reid sent off:
> At 5:00 PM EDT on May 26 Anton Graham sent off:
> > Both of these revolve around the use of sig-dashes.
> >
> > First, I have a corrspondent who (despite protests) uses the ``-- ``
> > sequence to separate his message from the text he is replying to
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 03:59:19PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> Carlos Puchol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > well, but attachments have a comment field or something
> > because i can see the name of the file being sent.
>
> That's just a filename. MIME attachments also have a "Content-Type
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 15:38:43 -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> In /etc/Muttrc, I only have the "mutt-1.0i" directory - I don't
> have mutt-1.2. That was something I was wondering about - why
> didn't the install give me a /usr/doc/mutt-1.2 directory?
If you didn't told the configure script to do
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 04:08:55PM -0300, Richard Spencer wrote:
> I wasn't able to install latest mutt rpm. According to the
> error message, I _already_have_ the newest package :-(
>
> # rpm -U /home/rks/ftp/mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6.i386.rpm
>error: package mutt-1.0.1i-8 (which is newer then
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 03:38:43PM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> In /etc/Muttrc, I only have the "mutt-1.0i" directory - I don't
> have mutt-1.2. That was something I was wondering about - why
> didn't the install give me a /usr/doc/mutt-1.2 directory?
If you installed from tarball, it might be
Thomas Ribbrock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > I wasn't able to install latest mutt rpm. According to the
> > error message, I _already_have_ the newest package :-(
> >
> > # rpm -U /home/rks/ftp/mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6.i386.rpm
> >error: package mutt-1.0.1i-8 (which is newer then
> >mutt
On 2000.05.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You mean strip sigs from quoted text in a reply? That's the editor's job
I strenuously disagree. I think we should rather say: it is the
established judgement of the Mutt development team that stripping
si
33 matches
Mail list logo
