Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To answer the original question: For mutt, no such thing > as a file extension exists when it looks at how to > interpret incoming data. well, but attachments have a comment field or something because i can see the name of the file being sent. it also puts it as a default file name when saving it. it would be nice to have the hooks to make viewer decisions based on that info. but i don't know mutt inside to tell how this can be to write, unfortunately. thanks for the response. ++ carlos
- handling text/plain based on extension of the file Carlos Puchol
- Re: handling text/plain based on extension of ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: handling text/plain based on extension... Carlos Puchol
- Re: handling text/plain based on exten... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: handling text/plain based on extension... Thomas Roessler
- Re: handling text/plain based on exten... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: handling text/plain based on exten... Carlos Puchol
- Re: handling text/plain based on e... David DeSimone
- Re: handling text/plain based... Gary Johnson
- Re: handling text/plain based on extension of ... David T-G