Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To answer the original question: For mutt, no such thing
> as a file extension exists when it looks at how to
> interpret incoming data.

well, but attachments have a comment field or something
because i can see the name of the file being sent.
it also puts it as a default file name when saving it.
it would be nice to have the hooks to make
viewer decisions based on that info.
but i don't know mutt inside to tell how this can be to write,
unfortunately.

thanks for the response.

++ carlos

Reply via email to