On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 03:04:17PM -0800 or thereabouts, Joshua Haberman wrote:
> For some reason, mutt fails to display the "N" next to folders with new
> messages in them on the folder index. The default folder_format string
> begins with %N and should do the trick, and I additionally tried
> ma
Hello!
You seem to be using the compressed folders patch?
I'll look into it.
Quoting r. Stewart V. Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Save-hook question":
> Hi all,
> ...
> As a second question - how can I convince mutt that there is new mail
> in compressed folders? I have procmail deliver some mail
Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 03 Feb 2000:
> Sorry to piggyback on your post, but this brings up a question I have
> about this definition. Is it possible to specify "all mailboxes in my
> $folder directory?"
Yes, use something like:
mailboxes `echo ~/mail/*`
Mikko
--
// Mik
> Sorry to piggyback on your post, but this brings up a question I have
> about this definition. Is it possible to specify "all mailboxes in my
> $folder directory?"
>
> None of them worked. Can it be done?
Yes. ie,
mailboxes =Inbox `echo $HOME/Mail/l/*`
randy
--
Five hundred, twenty-five
What is the difference between these two commands?
set quote_regexp="^[ \t]*[A-Z]{,3}[~|>:}#%]"
set quote_regexp="^[ \t]*[A-Z]{0,3}[~|>:}#%]"
According to what I read in the manual, they should be equivalent, the
first being preferred. But, the first command does not give the expected
output. I
I don't know if I have missed something but isn't it possible to
have search expressions highlighted in Mutt's own pager when you
search in article bodies from an index, like they are when you
perform a search from within the pager itself? To make myself
clear - if I search like ~b foo all matche
Hello,
I've searched the archives and I find many people wanting to autoview
their attachments. I however, would like *not* to autoview
attachments, because when I get an HTML-based spam mail, it makes it
difficult to view the headers.
I would like to know if there is a way to disable this feat
Stewart V. Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>fcc-save-hook ~A +People/%O.gz
>
> However, recently one of my correspondents has had their email name
> changed to all capitals, so now rather than being saved in
>People/personx.gz
> mutt wants to create
>People/PERSONX.gz
S
I receive mail at many email addresses, but they all get forwarded
to the same address.
For example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I want is for mutt to set the From: field when I reply to a message
to the same address as the To: field in the origi
Dav Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I want is for mutt to set the From: field when I reply to a message
> to the same address as the To: field in the original message.
There is a 'reverse_name' option you can enable to do this.
You will need to make sure that your 'alternates' settin
When receiving a msg, I have two From lines, one is tagged, From and the
other is From:
how can i ignore From ?
also is their a way to start writing an email, invoking default m key,
to go right to insert mode on the 2nd body line of my default editor of
vi?
Dav Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 03 Feb 2000:
> What I want is for mutt to set the From: field when I reply to a message
> to the same address as the To: field in the original message.
You should set the variable $reverse_name in your .muttrc. Make sure
your alternates settings are
Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 03 Feb 2000:
> how can i ignore From ?
ignore 'from '
... in your .muttrc.
> also is their a way to start writing an email, invoking default m key,
> to go right to insert mode on the 2nd body line of my default editor of
> vi?
That's more of a
On Thursday, February 03, 2000, David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Something like this should work:
>
> set alternates='^((dav|two)@abc\.com|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])$'
I think you missed a couple '\'...
set alternates='^((dav|two)@abc\.com|dav@foobar\.com|code@x
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:15:07AM -0500, Rob Bringman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've searched the archives and I find many people wanting to autoview
> their attachments. I however, would like *not* to autoview
> attachments, because when I get an HTML-based spam mail, it makes it
> difficult to view
When I reply, the orginal mail's content gets quoted followed by
the signature, and the cursor is set on the first line above the
quoted reply. There was some discussion in the past that the old
mail should be followed by the new.
Has anyone implemented automatic solution to include the new
mail
Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 03 Feb 2000:
> Has anyone implemented automatic solution to include the new
> mail+signature at the top followed by the quoted reply?
Mutt (deliberately) doesn't support this, not even as an option. To
get Mutt behave like that would require patching.
When I first started using mutt, all of 3 days ago, I was using the latest
stable release... 1.01 I believe. Anyway, I was able to set it up so that when
I closed mutt, it copied all of the mail I had completed reading into a
different folder. Now I am playing with the 1.1.2 release and it doesn
I posted this a week or so ago and got no response, so I thought I would
try again with a different (and hopefully more appropriate) subject line.
I am using mutt 1.0i and am have a problem with group reply. In my .muttrc
file I have remapped the g and ^G keys as follows:
bind generic
I receive mail at many email addresses, but they all get forwarded
to the same address.
For example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I want is for mutt to set the From: field when I reply to a message
to the same address as the To: field in the origi
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:51:25AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately the Windows (or graphical? to avoid Windows-antibias)
> email clients don't quite follow this line of thinking in their editors.
> I can understand the logic that "your own text should be placed in front
> of
* Jeffery Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000204 01:20]:
> In my .muttrc file I have remapped the g and ^G keys as follows:
> When I am in the index or pager and type ? it reports:
> ^G group-replyreply to all recipients
> However, when I type ^G nothing happens.
The ^G is u
I'm using gpg 1.0.0 with the IDEA and RSA modules loaded. It was all
compiled from source.
Same goes for PGP 5.01.
With GPG as my "pgp_default_version" I have no problem decrypting
and verifying signatures and messages made by either GPG or PGP.
When I use PGP with mutt however (pgp_default_ve
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 06:13:53PM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
> What is the current recommended approach to reply formats?
I, personally, can't stand it when someone replies above the quoted
text. It makes it difficult to follow the flow of the discussion.
The only time I really find that acceptab
OK, I'm prepared to be ashamed of a FAQ/RTFM, but I made a good-faith
effort to find this one and couldn't.
I am using Mutt 1.0i. I have about 50 aliases in a file separate from my
.muttrc, which are read in via a source command.
When I define two aliases where the second completely overlaps th
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 09:20:58AM -0500, Randall J . Million wrote:
:
:What is the difference between these two commands?
:
:set quote_regexp="^[ \t]*[A-Z]{,3}[~|>:}#%]"
:set quote_regexp="^[ \t]*[A-Z]{0,3}[~|>:}#%]"
:
:According to what I read in the manual, they should be equivalent, the
:first
26 matches
Mail list logo
