Stefan `Sec` Zehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think "./configure --enable-exact-address" does what you want :)
Is there some reason that this needs to be a compile-time option, rather
than a configurable setting?
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL
All,
I have a program that currently uses sendmail. I want to be able to send
attachments so I was thinking about switching to MUTT. The program,
however, sends the mail using a perl scriptso it is done through a CLI.
Can I do the same thing with MUTT but with the attachment feature?
Th
Kevin Arnold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> All,
>
> I have a program that currently uses sendmail. I want to be able to send
> attachments so I was thinking about switching to MUTT. The program,
> however, sends the mail using a perl scriptso it is done through a CLI.
> Can I do the sam
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 06:34:06PM -0500, Kevin Arnold wrote:
> I have a program that currently uses sendmail. I want to be able to send
> attachments so I was thinking about switching to MUTT. The program,
> however, sends the mail using a perl scriptso it is done through a CLI.
> Can I
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:49:44PM +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders'
> > display is just a directory listing in a unix'ish format by default
> > (is it customisable?),
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 06:11:28PM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> This came up a little bit ago here or on mutt-dev. I'm working on doing
> a nicer version of IMAP browsing. What's happening is you're using a
> server that allows folders to contain both messages and subfolders
> (Cyrus?) - so the f
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 06:19:45PM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > 2 - When it asked for my password it was for
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mailandnews.co.uk which is not my user name
> > at mailandnews.co.uk! :-)
>
> Are you doing
> set [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
> Mutt just sticks the hostname at the end as
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 05:38:30PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's what I expected to be able to do but if you download the
> > unstable snapshot there isn't a ./configure with it so you're stuffed!
>
> I don't download the snapshot. At least,
> > > Where can I get a mutt 0.96.xx with a ./configure with it?
> >
> > ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/mutt-0.96.6i.tar.gz ?
> >
> Yes, that's where I have got to in the end! Phew! The snapshots
> don't have ./configure with them but the devel tarballs do, how
> confusing (well, to m
Is it possible to move IMAP4 folders using mutt? This is a
fundamental need with any MUA using IMAP4 as the MUA may be the only
way one has of interacting with the server.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 12:00:10PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:49:44PM +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders'
> > > display is just a directo
Hi
I think i didnt explain myself pretty well in my last mail.
What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
like Netscape for example?
Thanks :)
Carl Johan Madestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
> What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
> in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
> like Netscape for example?
The short answer is "no".
The longer answer is still
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 02:03:30PM +0200, Carl Johan Madestrand thus spoke:
> Hi
>
> I think i didnt explain myself pretty well in my last mail.
> What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
> in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
> like
Maybe your currently selected font doesn't have those
characters? I see this in netscape every once and awhile,
but I've since switched to a truetype font server.
However, I still used the 'fixed' font in my terminals
and I can see the umlaut and esset characters just fine.
Josh
Hi,
often, I receive emails with several recipients CC'd and I need to reply
to both the sender and all others on the CC: list.
How can I do this with mutt? 'reply' only takes the sender and
'group-reply' ignores the sender.
Thank you in advance!
-- Thomas
> I think i didnt explain myself pretty well in my last mail.
> What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
> in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server,
No there isn't. mutt does not speak SMTP, and it shouldn't. You local
MTA is responsible for that.
>
Thomas Schoepf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
> How can I do this with mutt? 'reply' only takes the sender and
> 'group-reply' ignores the sender.
It doesn't for me.
Maybe your $alternatives setting is incorrect? That might make mutt to
not send to the sender of the email, if it
Good day!
I just wanted to ask if $subject annoys someone else. I'm a recent user
of 1.0pre2 and it has a bug fixed with a side-effect: I can't use 'y' and
'n' answering yes-or-no questions - only russian chars work. Previous
version let me use both cyrillic and latin chars.
I explored both 0.9
Carl Johan Madestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
> in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
> like Netscape for example?
Netscape tries to do everything itself, because they probably got tired
o
Mikko Hänninen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Thomas Schoepf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
> > How can I do this with mutt? 'reply' only takes the sender and
>
> Maybe your $alternatives setting is incorrect? That might make mutt to
> not send to the sender of the email, if it tho
Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
> Also check and see if the mail has a Mail-Followup-To set, as if it does
> Mutt will use this for a group-reply.
Not for list-reply? I thought Mail-Followup-To was for list emails.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMA
Mikko Hänninen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
> > Also check and see if the mail has a Mail-Followup-To set, as if it does
> > Mutt will use this for a group-reply.
>
> Not for list-reply? I thought Mail-Followup-To was for list emails.
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not for list-reply? I thought Mail-Followup-To was for list emails.
Mail-Followup-To *is* for list emails, but perhaps not in the way you
think.
There is often an annoyance factor to being on a mailing list. If you
make a post to the list, some peo
David DeSimone [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Well, Mail-Followup-To is an attempt to fix that. When you send mail to
> a list to which you are subscribed, Mutt knows this because you have
> told it so, using the "lists" directive. So, it will insert a
> Mail-Followup-To header, so that other list
Carl Johan Madestrand [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I think i didnt explain myself pretty well in my last mail.
> What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
> in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
> like Netscape for example?
I think you'
Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just a nit, but Mutt only inserts the header if $followup_to is set.
Yes, and mine is set.
> And your mail had no Mail-Followup-To header, so if you find it so
> useful you may want to set it so other people can make use of it for
> replies to your m
David DeSimone [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And your mail had no Mail-Followup-To header, so if you find it so
> > useful you may want to set it so other people can make use of it for
> > replies to your mails ;)
>
> Err... I *do* have followup_to se
Hi!
Tired of switching configuration to generate signed or encrypted
messages processable by PGP 2.x using folks (a lot here in Germany)
I wrote a wrapper for use with mutt which selects the proper options automatically
based on the chosen keys, which must be all of RSA
type. (The main reason wh
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 04:07:52AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> management interface). Still I don't know a way to make GnuPG both
> sign and encrypt a message at the same time, but I can live with that.
> Gero
To get GnuPG to sign and encrypt at the same time is in the gpg --help page
and the ma
On Wednesday, 22 September 1999 at 21:12, Allan K. Neal wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 04:07:52AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> > management interface). Still I don't know a way to make GnuPG both
> > sign and encrypt a message at the same time, but I can live with that.
> > Gero
>
> To get GnuP
> Does it make messages that PGP 2.6 can read? I think that is the issue.
> As I think I may have posted before, there is a patch somewhere on the
> gpg-dev list archive to make this possible, but it isn't trivial due to
> the fact that PGP 2.6 relies on tempfiles whereas GPG uses pipes, so GPG
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
