> Does it make messages that PGP 2.6 can read? I think that is the issue.
> As I think I may have posted before, there is a patch somewhere on the
> gpg-dev list archive to make this possible, but it isn't trivial due to
> the fact that PGP 2.6 relies on tempfiles whereas GPG uses pipes, so GPG
> can't put a signature at the head of a file very easily. PGP 2.6 doesn't
> expect signatures at the end.
>
I think if you do the gpg part externally you can sign and encrypt to an
ascii format, but I would think you would have to run gpg independantly and
then send that file.
I'm not really sure
that's my $0.02 on the issue
Allan
--
Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to.
My gpg and pgp public keys are available at:
http://cc.usu.edu/~slvkd/index.hmtl
PGP signature
