On Wednesday, 22 September 1999 at 21:12, Allan K. Neal wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 04:07:52AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> > management interface). Still I don't know a way to make GnuPG both
> > sign and encrypt a message at the same time, but I can live with that.
> > Gero
>
> To get GnuPG to sign and encrypt at the same time is in the gpg --help page
> and the man page. It is simply gpg -es [-a (for ascii armored)]
> <textfile>. And in mutt just select both sign and encrypt the message. It
> does do it. I've done it before.
Does it make messages that PGP 2.6 can read? I think that is the issue.
As I think I may have posted before, there is a patch somewhere on the
gpg-dev list archive to make this possible, but it isn't trivial due to
the fact that PGP 2.6 relies on tempfiles whereas GPG uses pipes, so GPG
can't put a signature at the head of a file very easily. PGP 2.6 doesn't
expect signatures at the end.
--
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | OLD SKOOL ROOLZ
"I hope I don't win | .-_|\
The rules say to bring a friend | / \
I don't have any" | Perth ->*.--._/
PGP signature
