On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 08:19:27PM +0200, E Forrest Carpenter wrote:
> gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
> Press any key to continue...
>
> Anyone know if there's a flag I'm missing or something to make this
> output go away?
echo no-secmem-warning >> ~/.gnupg/options
--
Jos Backus
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:34:03PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> On 10/Sep/1999, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> > individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> > work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them l
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 03:35:05AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> > individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> > work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
> > local folders to t
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I' desperately trying to better configure my mutt but I'm having problem
> > with the hooks. I need that all mail coming from BUGTRAQ and from some
> > other mailing list is stored in a separate file than inbox.
>
> Mutt do
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:28:20AM +0100, Mr.Axel Tillequin wrote:
I have installed procmail and already removed it. I do not like the way it works. I
think that save-hook is much more flexible. An, up to now, it works fine.
Marco
> Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> >
> > Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTE
Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I have installed procmail and already removed it. I do not like the way
> it works. I think that save-hook is much more flexible. An, up to now, it
> works fine.
If you want to sort mail as it arrives, you *cannot* use save-hooks to do
it. Mutt does no
"R. Marc" wrote:
>
> > I run windowmaker and would like to put an appicon on my desktop;
> > perhaps there is here somebody who prefers this combination of a mailer
> > and window manager and could help me a bit; any practical suggestions?
>
> You can just make an xterm icon for it, but that's p
Axel Tillequin:
> > Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
> >
>
> note:
> If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
> then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
> in the exim doc...Actually you will just have to write a .forward file
> with some special
>
If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
with mutt? Is there a simple way to give them names/aliases so they
can be accessed like local folders? Having to enter the full address
of the folder every time one w
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS dijo:
> Axel Tillequin:
>
> > > Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
> > >
> >
> > note:
> > If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
> > then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
> > in the exim doc...Actually you will just have t
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:02:59AM -0700, Leiden, Soren wrote:
| Simply put, %s is the url. COMMAND is required, and lynx is the program.
| COMMAND lynx %s
What are the lines/changes that goes into your .muttrc file to access lynx to
view the url ?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://salvo.reaper.or
On Monday, 13 September 1999 at 11:55, Chris Green wrote:
> If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
>
> I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
> with mutt? Is there a simple way to give them names/aliases so they
> can be accessed like local folde
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 07:43:58AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Monday, 13 September 1999 at 11:55, Chris Green wrote:
> > If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
> >
> > I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
> > with mutt? Is there a simple
Well I've worked out what I need to do to access my IMAP4 folders,
it's not very user friendly yet is it!
I think mutt needs some sort of local cache/memory of folder names as
typing the full folder name every time one accesses a folder just
isn't reasonable (e.g. {mailandnews.co.uk}inbox).
In a
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:31:16AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> > > Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
> > >
> >
> > note:
> > If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
> > then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
> > in the exim doc...Actual
I use GnuPG 1.0.0 and don't have PGP.
I can use GnuPG to sign my messages, but can't use it to encrypt them.
It looks to me that mutt can't find my public-key-rings.
What am I doing wrong?
The relevant options from ~/.muttrc:
-
Hi,
I've just noticed that flag-message does not work with the tag-prefix
function : if I tag a bunch of messages with tag-pattern, can I mark them as
important ?
Thanks,
Frédéric
this package (fetched from replay) unfortunately was compiled with pgp2-support only.
I use pgp5 and I cant compile the muttsource for my
own cause this leads to strange troubles (another story - unfortunately I can only use
the rpm at this moment).
Now I always get errors like
sh: v: command n
I was using mutt for a long time without any problems. A few days ago I decided to
upgrade to mutt1.0pre2i and now I am doomed.
Mutt opens the defaultmailbox ($mail) and shows me the mails. as soon as I want to
open another mailbox or quit mutt (so when mutt has to
close the current mailbox)
I was wondering, being new to Mutt, if it is possible to choose the
receive_pgp version on the fly. I use GnuPG but there are a lot of
People out there who use RSA key types. I know if they use Diffie-Hellman
Keys I can use GNUPG. I still, even in the Linux world, run into alot of
RSA keys.
A
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 02:37:47PM +0200, Cees van de Griend wrote:
> I can use GnuPG to sign my messages, but can't use it to encrypt them.
> It looks to me that mutt can't find my public-key-rings.
The name of the binary to access gnupg's keyring changed some versions
ago. I suggest upgrad
On Saturday, 11 September 1999 at 21:12, Allan K. Neal wrote:
> I was wondering, being new to Mutt, if it is possible to choose the
> receive_pgp version on the fly. I use GnuPG but there are a lot of
> People out there who use RSA key types. I know if they use Diffie-Hellman
> Keys I can use G
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 03:39:37PM +0200, Frederic Gobry wrote:
> I've just noticed that flag-message does not work with the tag-prefix
> function : if I tag a bunch of messages with tag-pattern, can I mark them as
> important ?
Yes, with , bound to 'w' by default.
Gero
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 11:25:08AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> You can download a module that gives GnuPG the ability to read RSA keys.
> It's in the contrib directory, I think.
With these modules gpg even signs and encrypts message in a pgp 2.6.3
compatible format. I didn't manage to make it b
> In my opinion, wmmail is useless until you have a permanent connexion.
I'm sure you have reason for this opinion, but if you use fetchmail
wmmail is simply grand, permanent connection or no, IMHO.
[snip]
> and most of the time people are trying to minimise their connexion time...so.
Hrm...wh
Salvatore Greco [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:02:59AM -0700, Leiden, Soren wrote:
> | Simply put, %s is the url. COMMAND is required, and lynx is the program.
> | COMMAND lynx %s
>
> What are the lines/changes that goes into your .muttrc file to access lynx to
> view th
On Monday, 13 September 1999 at 18:02, Gero Treuner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 11:25:08AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > You can download a module that gives GnuPG the ability to read RSA keys.
> > It's in the contrib directory, I think.
>
> With these modules gpg even signs and encrypts m
I am finding myself sifting through literally thousands of mailing list
messages per day and am looking for a mail client to help me better manage
the volumes of mail. I realize this is probably a biased audience, but who
better to ask than the experts? I especially like the message threading
feat
McKisson, Shawn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Would you say that mutt is probably the best mail client for handling
> mailing lists?
Yes. List-reply, threading (not just viewing, but deleting/etc. as well),
intelligent handling of stupid reply-to munging, correct mail-followup-to
handling, and alm
put
auto_view text/html
in ~/.muttrc
and
text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html
in ~/.mailcap
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 01:43:04PM +0200, Salvatore Greco wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:02:59AM -0700, Leiden, Soren wrote:
> | Simply put, %s is the url. COMMAND
>
> > Are there any other reasonable alternatives?
>
> Not that I'm aware of. I'm not even sure of any others that have a working
> list-reply.
>
> If you're the kind that expects the MUA to filter mail for you you may be
> suprised if you use Mutt and find it doesn't do its own filtering, but
oh. this is to view html mail. 'scuse me.
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 01:13:34PM -0700, Mark Luntzel wrote:
> put
>
> auto_view text/html
>
> in ~/.muttrc
>
> and
>
> text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html
>
> in ~/.mailcap
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 01:43:04PM +02
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:39:22AM -0700, R. Marc wrote:
[...]
> [snip]
> > and most of the time people are trying to minimise their connexion time...so.
>
> Hrm...what completely different worlds we live in. Even when I had a modem,
> I, and most of my friends, tried for 24x7 connections; did
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Sep 1999:
> The bug is that while all messages should be flagged deleted, in truth
> only those VISIBLE were deleted. Articles hidden in collapsed threads were
> -not- flagged nor deleted, and were written back out to the folder at quit
> time.
>
>
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 03:08:25AM +0300, Mikko Hnninen cogitated:
> Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Sep 1999:
> > The bug is that while all messages should be flagged deleted, in truth
> > only those VISIBLE were deleted. Articles hidden in collapsed threads were
> > -not- flagge
35 matches
Mail list logo
