McKisson, Shawn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Would you say that mutt is probably the best mail client for handling
> mailing lists?
Yes. List-reply, threading (not just viewing, but deleting/etc. as well),
intelligent handling of stupid reply-to munging, correct mail-followup-to
handling, and almost ridiculous support for multiple addresses are
invaluable when dealing with lists.
> Are there any other reasonable alternatives?
Not that I'm aware of. I'm not even sure of any others that have a working
list-reply.
If you're the kind that expects the MUA to filter mail for you you may be
suprised if you use Mutt and find it doesn't do its own filtering, but this
is the way it should be.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-----------------+-------------------------+------------------------------
"If Microsoft can change and compete on quality, I've won." -- L. Torvalds
PGP signature
