Hi,
I've now used Mutt for a week, and think it's a really great program.
There are, however, some issues that I still haven't figured out how
to do (or if it's possible at all).
I'm using MH at work on a Solaris 2.7 box with MH folders and at home
using mbox folders on a Linux 2.2.5 machine.
1
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 04:35:03PM -0700, rex wrote:
>
> Xlib.h, Xutil.h, Xatom.h keysym.h, cursorfont.h, and Intrinsic.h
>
> The includes for these files appear in xterm.c:
>
> #ifndef VMS
> # include
> # include
> .
> .
> .
>
> None of these files appear to be on my system. There is
My apologies for not searching the archives very thoroughly. I tried
a few basic searches, but nothing seemed to leap out at me. If this
problem has already been fixed, I'm glad to hear it, and please
disregard this message.
On with the bug report:
I was using Graham Barr's Perl 5 module Date
Hi,
I've now used Mutt for a week, and think it's a really great program.
There are, however, some issues that I still haven't figured out how
to do (or if it's possible at all).
I'm using MH at work on a Solaris 2.7 box with MH folders and at home
using mbox folders on a Linux 2.2.5 machine.
1
I have just upgraded to 95.6 and now find I can not send. Foolishly I
deleted the old version so I am reduced to sending by elm (shame, shame!).
I get:-
Error sending message, child exited 64
The command was used incorrectly.
The syslog says "0832-099 is not a known flag". Clearly a sendmail
pr
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Another said it looked like $dsn-notify and $dsn-return were set.
> These are in my .muttrc but commented out.
I got this problem when using qmail's sendmail. Try adding these lines
just in case the default is not unset:
unset dsn_notify
unset dsn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The syslog says "0832-099 is not a known flag". Clearly a sendmail
> problem, but what?
It would be interesting to trap the sendmail command that's being
launched, but that requires a bit of work.
The following options determine what sendmail comm
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 10:52:51PM -0600, Tkil wrote:
> | Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 21:10:28 +875400
> | X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e
Thanks BUT VERY old news - this was (heavily) discussed (and fixed) right
after the first (of Jan, 1999).
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
Direct: Box 927, Northa
> You missed one... read doc/PGP-Notes.txt that came with your Mutt
> distribution.
>
I've also been looking for the answer to this. I've read and re-read
the PGP-Notes.txt and there is little documentation about whey pgp
messages are attachments rather than the body of the message.
===
Eric
Stasinos Konstantopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've trying to figure out how read messages are marked. `Status: RO'
> looked promising, but I thing that it only gets added after mutt is
> closed or I change folder. How can I get mutt to do it as soon as I
> read a message?
The method d
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Eric Maquiling dixit:
~>
~> > You missed one... read doc/PGP-Notes.txt that came with your Mutt
~> > distribution.
~> >
~>
~> I've also been looking for the answer to this. I've read and re-read
~> the PGP-Notes.txt and there is little documentation about whey pgp
~> messages are attachments ra
Staffan Hämälä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2. Is there a way to assign a key that shows me the folder index directly.
> Ie, the same thing as the sequence c, ? and TAB.
You can assign a macro to press those keys for you.
macro index C "c?\t"
> 3. Is it possible, using the save-hook or s
--- Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The old way of just plain text sigs/etc just plain isn't "really
> suited to
Okay, I'm starting to understand. Looks like I need to do some more
reading this week :(
===
Eric "emaq" Maquiling
_
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The syslog says "0832-099 is not a known flag". Clearly a sendmail
> > problem, but what?
>
> It would be interesting to trap the sendmail command that's being
> launched, but that requires a bit of work.
>
> The following options determi
Hello,
It's highly probable I'm missing something somewhere, but
it seems to me that if mutt is invoked via 'mutt -y' (with
"mailboxes" defined in .muttrc), once you select a mailbox
to work with, there is no way to get back to the "mailboxes
browser" menu.
I've been unable to compile the last few releases of mutt under Irix
(6.5.3m and 6.5.4m). As a result, I'm still using 0.95.1i. I'm
wondering if anyone else has done it successfully. Surely I'm not the
only SGI user who likes mutt...
Has anyone compiled mutt 0.95.6i under Irix 6.5, using the SGI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tried this too. mutt does not give a command line as far as I can
> see.
Very well, try this:
Create a script called ~/sendmail-script, like so:
#!/bin/sh
exec >$HOME/sendmail.log 2>&1
set -x
"$@"
Make it executable, then in Mu
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's highly probable I'm missing something somewhere, but
> it seems to me that if mutt is invoked via 'mutt -y' (with
> "mailboxes" defined in .muttrc), once you select a mailbox
> to work with,
on Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 04:01:22PM -0700, Steve Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've been unable to compile the last few releases of mutt under Irix
> (6.5.3m and 6.5.4m). As a result, I'm still using 0.95.1i. I'm
> wondering if anyone else has done it successfully. Surely I'm not the
> onl
Steve Sizemore writes:
> I've been unable to compile the last few releases of mutt under Irix
> (6.5.3m and 6.5.4m). As a result, I'm still using 0.95.1i. I'm
> wondering if anyone else has done it successfully. Surely I'm not the
> only SGI user who likes mutt...
>
> Has anyone compiled mutt 0.9
21 matches
Mail list logo
