send-hooks to the end of its list of send-hooks. That can lead to
unexpected behavior and make it difficult to get the behavior you want.
One solution to that problem is to use the 'unhook send-hook' command as
the first folder-hook command, like this:
folder-hook . u
Sweth --
...and then Sweth Chandramouli said...
%
...
% I'd say that that's accurate, except I'd change the
% phrases "sending in general" to "sending in general except to another
% list", which I think is what you meant anyways.
It was; good enough.
%
...
% > folder-hook =3Dlists/mu
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 09:42:50PM -, mutt-users-digest wrote:
> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:04:03 -0500
> From: David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: More send-hook (+folder-hook) questions (long)
>
> Your description is a little convoluted. Please allow me to
[ you should try to avoid using tabs in mail/news ]
Hi,
* Sweth Chandramouli [02-06-11 20:30:56 +0200] wrote:
> My new project: trying to deal with my mailing lists
> correctly. I have a bunch of lists, each with its own
> folder under =lists, to which I'm subscribed.
Here, too, nothing specia
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:22:47PM -0400, Sweth Chandramouli wrote:
[...sniiip..]
> So, I'm totally confused now. What gives?
i don't know. ;-) but i have a suggestion in the form of a question
because i don't have time to play with it myself. is it possible to get
rid of t
Sweth --
Your description is a little convoluted. Please allow me to attempt to
clearly restate your goal and confirm or deny the presentation.
In =lists/mutt
sending in general (to the list, to me, to your mom)
From: mutt@yoursite
In =lists/loganalysis
sending in general (to the list,
OK, I'm having lots of issues with send-hooks recently,
it seems. My new project: trying to deal with my mailing lists
correctly. I have a bunch of lists, each with its own folder under
=lists, to which I'm subscribed. In my ideal situation, when I send
mail to any of those lists, I wan
Peter Lavender muttered:
> I thought I had this working, but seems that I have broken something,
> and I'm not sure I'm using send and folder-hook correctly.
>
> What I need to have happen is that my .sig changes, my From address is
> correct (which it is) and the reply-to: header is correct, and
Peter --
...and then Peter Lavender said...
% Hi everyone,
Hello again!
%
% I thought I had this working, but seems that I have broken something,
% and I'm not sure I'm using send and folder-hook correctly.
Did my hook examples and muttrc.* files help you? I was going to go back
to a note I
Hi everyone
I have a folder that I have procmail chuck all email for my company's
address into. When I send from this folder though, I want to get rid
of the "vanity" headers (X-Operating-System and X-Uptime), but it
doesn't work.
Here's what i have:
# Setup the defaults.
folder-hook .set
Hi everyone,
I thought I had this working, but seems that I have broken something,
and I'm not sure I'm using send and folder-hook correctly.
What I need to have happen is that my .sig changes, my From address is
correct (which it is) and the reply-to: header is correct, and remove
the vanitity
11 matches
Mail list logo
