On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:22:47PM -0400, Sweth Chandramouli wrote:

[...]

Forgive me for not responding to each part of your message, but I was
getting confused, too.  One of the things to keep in mind when you're
using folder-hooks to add send-hooks is that mutt will just keep adding
new send-hooks to the end of its list of send-hooks.  That can lead to
unexpected behavior and make it difficult to get the behavior you want.
One solution to that problem is to use the 'unhook send-hook' command as
the first folder-hook command, like this:

    folder-hook .       unhook send-hook
    folder-hook folder1 send-hook . 'my_hdr From: my_folder1_address'
    folder-hook folder2 send-hook . 'my_hdr From: my_folder2_address'
    folder-hook .       'send-hook "~t someone_special" "unmy_hdr From:"'
    folder-hook .       'send-hook "~t someone_else_special" "my_hdr From: 
my_other_address"'

The idea here is to first clear all the send-hooks, then set any
folder-dependent default send-hooks, then set any folder-independent,
recipient-specific send-hooks.  You can extend this idea to include
folder-dependent, recipient-specific send-hooks as well.

HTH,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson                               | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                   | Spokane, Washington, USA
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |

Reply via email to