On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Xu Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Andrzej Popielewicz
>> wrote:
>>> * Xu Wang [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>&g
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Xu Wang wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Andrzej Popielewicz
> wrote:
>> * Xu Wang [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
>
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Andrzej Popielewicz
wrote:
> * Xu Wang [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
>> run when I do "R" to change to the postponed folder.
>>
* Xu Wang [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
> run when I do "R" to change to the postponed folder.
>
> Note that in my .muttrc I have:
>
> set postponed="+[Gmail].Drafts"
* Kevin J. McCarthy [2015-05-29 10:08:35]:
> Xu Wang wrote:
> > I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
>
> When you use "R" you aren't really changing to the postponed folder. If
> there is more than one postponed message, it wil
Xu Wang wrote:
> I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
> run when I do "R" to change to the postponed folder.
When you use "R" you aren't really changing to the postponed folder. If
there is more than one postponed message, it wil
W dniu 2015-05-29 o 10:35, Suvayu Ali pisze:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:24:01AM +0200, Andrzej Popielewicz wrote:
So You want to achieve something like shown below
folder-hook "imap.googlemail.com/Drafts" set editor="vim"
folder-hook "imap.googlemail.com/Sent" set editor="pico"
Note that for f
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:24:01AM +0200, Andrzej Popielewicz wrote:
>
> So You want to achieve something like shown below
>
> folder-hook "imap.googlemail.com/Drafts" set editor="vim"
> folder-hook "imap.googlemail.com/Sent" set editor="pico"
Note that for folder-hooks it is important to have a
W dniu 2015-05-28 o 23:23, Andrzej Popielewicz pisze:
* Xu Wang [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:
Dear all,
I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
run when I do "R" to change to the postponed folder.
Note that in my .muttrc I have:
set postponed="+[Gmai
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Andrzej Popielewicz
wrote:
> * Xu Wang [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
>> run when I do "R" to change to the postponed folder.
>>
* Xu Wang [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
> run when I do "R" to change to the postponed folder.
>
> Note that in my .muttrc I have:
>
> set postponed="+[Gmail].Drafts"
Dear all,
I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
run when I do "R" to change to the postponed folder.
Note that in my .muttrc I have:
set postponed="+[Gmail].Drafts"
but the hook does not seem to work. I tried many, including:
folder-hook
Dear all,
I would like to have a key that is bound to a function that sends all
drafts, one by one. I have searched and have not found any mutt
solution, although I have found external solutions:
http://objectmix.com/mutt/202590-send-all-postponed-messages.html
http://mutt-users.mutt.narkive.com/
Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Sorry to resurrect an old (and somewhat heated) thread, but I'd like
> some feedback on the interface for a patch I'd like to push (attached,
> or see ticket #3665). The patch was based off the one submitted by
> Christian Brabandt, so thank you Christian!
I've just pus
Rejo Zenger wrote:
> To me, that is of no particular use.
>
> Against what version is the patch you have provided?
Thanks for the feedback.
The patch should apply against the tip of the default branch. It may
take a little bit of wiggling to get it to apply to something older
because of changes
Am 2015-01-07 23:57, schrieb Kevin J. McCarthy:
Óscar Pereira wrote:
The subject seems pretty self-explanatory. Use case, you're writing
an email, which is already marked as to be sent encrypted, but you
have to postpone it. In the meantime offlineimap runs and syncs you
mailboxes, and thus your
++ 07/01/15 14:57 -0800 - Kevin J. McCarthy:
I'm wondering if that is sufficient for people interested in the patch,
or whether a quadoption for postpone_encrypt would be more useful. For
a quadoption, I would keep the behaviour the same: the quadoption would
only be consulted if the message enc
*/
+ { "postpone_encrypt", DT_BOOL, R_NONE, OPTPOSTPONEENCRYPT, 0 },
+ /*
+ ** .pp
+ ** When \fIset\fP, postponed messages that are marked for encryption will be
+ ** encrypted using the key in $$postpone_encrypt_as before saving.
+ ** (Crypto only)
+ */
+ { "postpone_encrypt_as"
(For schedule reasons I was unable to reply earlier)
Erik,
It was never my intention to do anyone's thinking for them. At least
knowing you interpreted my words that way explains your reaction (I
would have reacted the same way). Perhaps that fault lies with me --
I am not a native English speake
!-- On Mon 9.Sep'13 at 20:33:43 BST, David Champion (d...@bikeshed.us), wrote:
>
> I confess I haven't dug my way through the entire debate on this, but so
> far I've seen argument along lines of: is it a necessary feature? if it
> is necessary, is it necessary to be supported in mutt per se, or
On Mo, 09 Sep 2013, David Champion wrote:
> I confess I haven't dug my way through the entire debate on this, but so
> far I've seen argument along lines of: is it a necessary feature? if it
> is necessary, is it necessary to be supported in mutt per se, or can it
> be done externally?
>
> I hav
I confess I haven't dug my way through the entire debate on this, but so
far I've seen argument along lines of: is it a necessary feature? if it
is necessary, is it necessary to be supported in mutt per se, or can it
be done externally?
I haven't seen any discussion of what use models it would ha
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:39:09PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> If we can each just argue our own case, then the list can be spared a
> lot of noise.
That's a grand idea (seriously), but this is isn't debate club. Most
people have litte or no training in formal logic, and while if you
have
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:20:33AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
> Honestly though, I don't see your question as overly pertinent. If
> security is a primary concern, why are you sending (and storing)
> encrypted messages on a server to begin with? I don't think that's
> for me to answer.
Right. The
f this substantially affects whether Mutt should encrypt
postponed messages.
--
Derek D. Martinhttp://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconve
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 06:13:20PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 06.09.13 10:10, Derek Martin wrote:
> > If it's sensitive enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive
> > enough to be encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it
> > yet.
>
> That's entirely convincing, but
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:05:16AM -0500, Dale Raby wrote:
> If it's sensitive
> > enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive enough to be
> > encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it yet.
> >
>
> Well, its easy enough to encrypt the whole disk with modern OS's, so
> if the
On Sep 09, 2013 at 11:47 PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
To have an unencrypted subject line, it's necessary to enter it in mutt,
prior to postponing. However, that's probably an asset if the subject
ought also be obfuscated, E.g. "We go to war tomorrow" might be safer as
"Immediate plans". If
On 08.09.13 20:14, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Sep 09, 2013 at 02:31 AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> >That would remove the editor choice restriction, and so would be more
> >universal once it exits. Added to that, draft encryption integrated
> >into mutt uses less keystrokes and requires less user c
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> Yep, I had more than once, on machine(s) with no vim. I've never managed to
> learn how to use emacs, but as they say it's never tool late to learn to play
> the piano! :p
It's more like an organ, and yes you do need the whole Cathedral.
On 07.09.13 18:00, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> So now suppose (*my* scenario, not yours) that mutt used an external
> program to view emails, and, we were discussing adding the feature of
> viewing encrypted emails to mutt. By a reasoning *similar* to yours,
> i.e. reasoning in a way coherent to yours,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:05:16AM -0500, Dale Raby wrote:
> If it's sensitive
> > enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive enough to be
> > encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it yet.
> >
>
> Well, its easy enough to encrypt the whole disk with modern OS's, so
> if the
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 08:14:47PM -0400, Tim Gray
wrote:
> encrypting a mutt draft in Vim. You encrypt it,
> then save the file, and once you are back in
> mutt, postpone the message. It worked fine, as
> long as you are ok with all the mail headers
> being encrypted and thus inaccessible
On Sep 09, 2013 at 02:31 AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
That would remove the editor choice restriction, and so would be more
universal once it exits. Added to that, draft encryption integrated
into mutt uses less keystrokes and requires less user concentration than
encryption provided by the
On Sunday 08 Sep 2013 17:31:43 Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 08.09.13 14:59, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Vim certainly could and Emacs probably can encrypt. But what about Nano,
> > pico, mcedit, gedit, kate? Therefore, I think, it is still mutt's
> > responsibility to encrypt the file.
>
> G'da
On 08.09.13 14:59, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Vim certainly could and Emacs probably can encrypt. But what about Nano,
> pico, mcedit, gedit, kate? Therefore, I think, it is still mutt's
> responsibility to encrypt the file.
G'day Christian,
That would remove the editor choice restriction, and
Hi Erik!
On So, 08 Sep 2013, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 07.09.13 14:40, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > > No. Just because mutt encrypts for transmission does not obligate it to
> > > encrypt other files which might or might not later be transmitted.
> > > This is where you are conflating two se
I'll reply to rest of email later, but I want to make two things
clear.
First, you accuse me of being intellectually dishonest, because I
«attempt to ascribe» to you a scenario I thought up. I was (and am)
not, but since that seems not to have been clear enough, I'll try to
explain it more careful
On 07.09.13 14:40, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Erik!
G'day Christian. A thoughtful response is most welcome.
> On Sa, 07 Sep 2013, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > What you have seem to have missed is that the editor is not encrypting
> > the email for transmission. Mutt still does that. To this e
On 07.09.13 12:56, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 07:51:41PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > On 07.09.13 09:44, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 06:13:20PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > We use an editor to create the text for an email, so it needs to read
Hi Erik!
On Sa, 07 Sep 2013, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>
> No, the "logic" which you have constructed there in unconvincing, due to
> being erroneous.
>
> We use an editor to create the text for an email, so it needs to read
> and write the encrypted postponed file - mutt is not involved, beyond
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 07:51:41PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 07.09.13 09:44, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 06:13:20PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > > On 06.09.13 10:10, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > > If it's sensitive enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive
On 07.09.13 09:44, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 06:13:20PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > On 06.09.13 10:10, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > If it's sensitive enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive
> > > enough to be encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent i
!-- On Sat 7.Sep'13 at 9:44:16 BST, Óscar Pereira (burn.till.s...@gmail.com),
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 06:13:20PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > On 06.09.13 10:10, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > If it's sensitive enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive
> > > enough to be encryp
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 06:13:20PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 06.09.13 10:10, Derek Martin wrote:
> > If it's sensitive enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive
> > enough to be encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it
> > yet.
>
> That's entirely convincing, but
On 06.09.13 10:10, Derek Martin wrote:
> If it's sensitive enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive
> enough to be encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it
> yet.
That's entirely convincing, but it doesn't follow that this has anything
to do with mutt, I figure. I use vim w
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:05:16AM -0500, Dale Raby wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> If it's sensitive
> > enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive enough to be
> > encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it yet.
> >
>
> Well, its easy enough t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If it's sensitive
> enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive enough to be
> encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it yet.
>
Well, its easy enough to encrypt the whole disk with modern OS's, so
if the message is on your machine
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:45:46PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 05:30:16PM +0100, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The subject seems pretty self-explanatory. Use case, you're writing
> > an email, which is already marked as to be sent encrypted, but you
> > hav
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:45:46PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 05:30:16PM +0100, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> > The subject seems pretty self-explanatory. Use case, you're writing an
> > email, which is already marked as to be sent encrypted, but you have to
> > postpone it.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 05:30:16PM +0100, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The subject seems pretty self-explanatory. Use case, you're writing
> an email, which is already marked as to be sent encrypted, but you
> have to postpone it. In the meantime offlineimap runs and syncs you
> mailboxes,
Dear all,
The subject seems pretty self-explanatory. Use case, you're writing
an email, which is already marked as to be sent encrypted, but you
have to postpone it. In the meantime offlineimap runs and syncs you
mailboxes, and thus your mail which is to be sent encrypted ends up
in (say) Gmail's
hello
when I have multiple postponed messages
I cannot enter into them
First it was telling me that rxvt was not installed
So I installed it and now is like it tries to open it very quicly
and then it closes
but I cannot open it with my normal editor nano
here is the line in my .muttrc that I
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 03:18:23PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> What about installing a simple SMTP daemon on your machine, which will
> relay your emails to your office's mailserver, once you're back online?
As it turns out exim was already configured to do this. I just hadn't
given it a chance t
* On 2002.09.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Alex Polite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I regularly deal with mail when I'm away from my DSL pipe. Right now
> I'm at the coffee shop and the postponed messages are piling up. When
> I get back to the
* Alex Polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-17 12:20]:
> I regularly deal with mail when I'm away from my DSL pipe. Right now
> I'm at the coffee shop and the postponed messages are piling up. When
> I get back to the office I'd like to be able to
> send-all-pos
* Alex Polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17-09-2002 14:20]:
> I regularly deal with mail when I'm away from my DSL pipe. Right now
> I'm at the coffee shop and the postponed messages are piling up. When
> I get back to the office I'd like to be able to
> send-all-
I regularly deal with mail when I'm away from my DSL pipe. Right now
I'm at the coffee shop and the postponed messages are piling up. When
I get back to the office I'd like to be able to
send-all-postponed-messages.
--
Alex Polite
http://plusseven.com/gpg/
I regularly deal with mail when I'm away from my DSL pipe. Right now
I'm at the coffee shop and the postponed messages are piling up. When
I get back to the office I'd like to be able to
send-all-postponed-messages.
--
Alex Polite
http://plusseven.com/gpg/
he traditional way. The first
line ensures that the default is to sent quality email.
After postponing mail and restarting mutt of course I get the default
non-traditional setting, even when recalling postponed messages.
How can I keep the setting for postponed messages?
Raoul Boenisch
Hello Eduardo,
On Friday, July 5, 2002 at 9:42:12 AM -0400, Eduardo J. Gargiulo wrote:
> I'm using mutt 1.4 and folder-hooks to set from and return-path
> headers.
You should not set a "Return-Path:" header. It's eventually your
recipient's delivering MTA's task, which will set there the p
Hi all.
I'm using mutt 1.4 and folder-hooks to set from and return-path
headers. The problem is that when i postpone a message and then send
it, i'm loosing the return-path setup, and it's replaced by default
folder-hook return-path. Is there any way to postpone a message and
don't miss the retur
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> perhaps you have 'recall' set to 'yes' instead of 'ask-yes'?
>
That was exactly it! Thank-you.
David
--
All generalizations are false, including this one. -- Mark Twain
-
David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | David Clarke
Key Fingerprint : 869
David Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2002, Holger Lillqvist wrote:
> > Sure it is posible to have multiple postponed msgs.
>
> Once I have one postponed message, I am not able to compose new
> messages until I have sent the postponed messages, I am only able to
> compose
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002, Holger Lillqvist wrote:
> Sure it is posible to have multiple postponed msgs.
>
Once I have one postponed message, I am not able to compose new messages
until I have sent the postponed messages, I am only able to compose
replies, which I can then postpone. Is t
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 08:42:21PM +1100, David Clarke wrote:
> I'm just wondering if it's possible to have multiple postponed
> messages, as whenever I try to compose a new message, it loads the
> previously postponed message.
Yes. When you have more than one postponed
On Feb 8, David Clarke wrote:
> I'm just wondering if it's possible to have multiple postponed
> messages, as whenever I try to compose a new message, it loads the
> previously postponed message.
Sure it is posible to have multiple postponed msgs.
You must have the q
Howdy,
I'm just wondering if it's possible to have multiple postponed
messages, as whenever I try to compose a new message, it loads the
previously postponed message.
TIA,
David.
--
All generalizations are false, including this one. -- Mark Twain
-
Da
Rod Pike [mutt-users] :
> Is there a way of sending all postponed messages as a batch without
> having to do them one at a time?
As you're running sendmail see http://www.hserus.net/sendmail.html
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lu
t;
>Subject: Batch sending postponed messages
>Mail-Followup-To: Mutt-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
>
>Is there a way of sending all postponed messages as a batch without
>having to do them one at a time?
>--
>Rod Pike
>rodneyp @ utanet.at
>
Is there a way of sending all postponed messages as a batch without
having to do them one at a time?
--
Rod Pike
rodneyp @ utanet.at
Erika Pacholleck proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> But better than this mousing around - and no I do not intend to
> throw Mutt out but kmail as soon as I got my headers correct.
Try my howto at http://www.hserus.net/dlhowto.html (email on a
dialup). That's a howto on how to configure sendm
gt; not have to be logged in as root) at regular intervals. And at
> this moment I have in the neighborhood of a half-dozen postponed
> messages in Mutt.
Ok, in kmail I made myself a folder out.wait for drafts besides out.
But you are right sendmail -q does the trick - for god sake this is
n
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 12:54:21PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 08:11:22AM +0100, Pacholleck wrote:
>> I cannot afford long online times waiting that some sendmail
>> deceides to try delivery again or recalling every of all those
>> postponed in vi again.
>
>If you're o
ossible to send the
> > postponed messages in one bunch once I am connected to the net?
> >
> > I cannot afford long online times waiting that some sendmail
> > deceides to try delivery again or recalling every of all those
> > postponed in vi again.
>
> If you&#
as root) at regular intervals. And at
this moment I have in the neighborhood of a half-dozen postponed
messages in Mutt.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 08:11:22AM +0100, Pacholleck wrote:
> I have already been through dejanews for search and as far as I
> understood form the thread it is reall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 08:11:22AM +0100, Pacholleck wrote:
> > I have already been through dejanews for search and as far as I
> > understood form the thread it is really not possible to send the
> > postponed messages i
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 08:11:22AM +0100, Pacholleck wrote:
> I have already been through dejanews for search and as far as I
> understood form the thread it is really not possible to send the
> postponed messages in one bunch once I am connected to the net?
>
> I cannot afford lo
search and as far as I
> understood form the thread it is really not possible to send the
> postponed messages in one bunch once I am connected to the net?
>
> Can't really believe that there is not yet a solution out there
> from one of all those mutt users, but unfortunately t
I have already been through dejanews for search and as far as I
understood form the thread it is really not possible to send the
postponed messages in one bunch once I am connected to the net?
Can't really believe that there is not yet a solution out there
from one of all those mutt users
, and the message would appear in the
correct order, but sometimes I need to sort by date-received. Can I
somehow get mutt to send "fresh" "^From " lines when sending
postponed messages?
This seems like a bug to me, as it misrepresents the date and time a
message was received.
Th
mutt copies the message to the sent folder and then calls the MDA. So if
the MDA fails, the copy to sent mail is already made. Postponing it just
makes the correct copy that you think it does.
randy
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 09:54:02PM -0400, Ken W wrote:
> Is mutt supposed to FCC a postponed mess
Is mutt supposed to FCC a postponed message to =sent? This server had
a problem the other day where exim ran out of disk space to I could
not send mail, so I posponed it until I could send it. After doing
this a few times it sent. I just went into =sent and found a copy of
those mails for every
On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 06:09:00PM +0200, Renaud Colinet wrote:
> Hmm, mutt complains at startup: no such menu
> I tried 'postponed' instead of 'postpone' (the former seems more likely from
> what I read in the manual), but I get the same message.
> I wonder if it recognizes this menu (maybe a pro
on Apr 28, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 12:36:55PM +0200, Renaud Colinet wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > when i recall a postponed message, the only thing I can do (afaik) is press
> > , which brings me in insert mode. To send the message I have to exit
> > the editor and send. Is it
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 12:36:55PM +0200, Renaud Colinet wrote:
> Hi
>
> when i recall a postponed message, the only thing I can do (afaik) is press
> , which brings me in insert mode. To send the message I have to exit
> the editor and send. Is it possible to skip this phase and send the message
Hi
when i recall a postponed message, the only thing I can do (afaik) is press
, which brings me in insert mode. To send the message I have to exit
the editor and send. Is it possible to skip this phase and send the message
without editing ? (the 'y' key has no effect in this mode)
TIA
--
__
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 11:06:07PM +, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 1999-01-15-21:59:12 Rob Kaper:
> > Something I'd like to do, but haven't found in the manuals etc:
> >
> > send all postponed messages at once, without editing them etc.
> >
> > Is this
1999-01-15-21:59:12 Rob Kaper:
> Something I'd like to do, but haven't found in the manuals etc:
>
> send all postponed messages at once, without editing them etc.
>
> Is this possible with mutt? If yes: how? If no: why not ;) and where can I
> send the suggestion
: send all postponed messages at once, without editing them etc.
:
: Is this possible with mutt? If yes: how? If no: why not ;) and where can I
: send the suggestion for such a feature?
Possible, not now. I believe that the rationale is that postponed
messages are works still in progress and
Something I'd like to do, but haven't found in the manuals etc:
send all postponed messages at once, without editing them etc.
Is this possible with mutt? If yes: how? If no: why not ;) and where can I
send the suggestion for such a feature?
Grtz, Rob
--
Rob Kaper | mail: [EMAIL
91 matches
Mail list logo
