Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-03-16 Thread Dan Ciprus (dciprus)
I am not a Lua expert but imapfilter has its limitations. There are situations where imafilter can not parse headers properly and emails from the mailing lists are not properly sorted. If I was about to re-do my email delivery flow, I would probably avoid imapfilter do to detailed work completel

Re: Resolved!![unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-17 Thread Bhaskar Chowdhury
send pop up. Any clue? I saw some rexexes but couldn't figure out how to apply them. More over is there any "in-built" way of getting that?? No, $new_mail_command doesn't provide anything sophisticated. It operates at the same time as $beep_new - running when Mutt detects

Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-14 Thread Angel M Alganza
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 04:36:07PM +, Sam Kuper wrote: https://pypi.org/project/cs.app.mailfiler/ which monitors multiple Maildirs for new messages, and files them according to per-folder rules. Nice. I've bookmarked this as a procmail alternative :) Have a look at imapfilter, too.

Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-14 Thread Sam Kuper
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 11:24:59AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 13Feb2021 19:29, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: >> How?? Show us...share with the people .. > > I collect my email with getmail, deliver to my local "+spool" mail > folder, a Maildir (~/mail/spool). > > I filter my messages using ma

Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-13 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 14Feb2021 06:48, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: >.but depending too much of other software makes it fragile and >prone to >error and least to say it is complex. Aye. But you asked. You can see from the opening comment of the alert script: # Write a possibly-colourised string to the alert

Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-13 Thread Bhaskar Chowdhury
On 11:24 Sun 14 Feb 2021, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 13Feb2021 19:29, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: On 07:40 Sat 13 Feb 2021, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 12Feb2021 09:36, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:59:38AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: The problem it pops up for every new

Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-13 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 13Feb2021 19:29, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: >On 07:40 Sat 13 Feb 2021, Cameron Simpson wrote: >>On 12Feb2021 09:36, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >>>On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:59:38AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: The problem it pops up for every new mail arrive. [...] >>>For more sophisticated

Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-13 Thread Bhaskar Chowdhury
On 07:40 Sat 13 Feb 2021, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 12Feb2021 09:36, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:59:38AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: The problem it pops up for every new mail arrive. [...] For more sophisticated notification, you'll need to use another tool. For

Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-12 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 12Feb2021 09:36, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:59:38AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: >>The problem it pops up for every new mail arrive. [...] >For more sophisticated notification, you'll need to use another tool. For xample, my own new mail desktop notifications happe

Re: [unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-12 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:59:38AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: The problem it pops up for every new mail arrive. All I need to know about when I am in the TO or CC field or received mail from some specific individuals, then only the notify send pop up. Any clue? I saw some rexexes but

[unixbhas...@gmail.com: Notify-send pop up for specific mails]

2021-02-11 Thread Bhaskar Chowdhury
- Forwarded message from Bhaskar Chowdhury - Kindly throw some light. Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:41:28 +0530 From: Bhaskar Chowdhury To: ke...@8t8.us Subject: Notify-send pop up for specific mails Hey Kevin, I was wondering and hovering through the manual pages ,it failed to come to

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-29 Thread dale
On 07/28/2016 09:00 PM, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 20:23:49 -0400, dale wrote: On 07/28/2016 07:39 PM, dale wrote: On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I us

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
Thanks, got a routing error with port 587, pressed q a lot of times than cancelled the terminal because I want to start over and see any progression of messages and copy them besides just the routing error, now regardless of many times I switch the port my ,muttrc back and forth can't

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 20:23:49 -0400, dale wrote: > On 07/28/2016 07:39 PM, dale wrote: > >On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > >>On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: > >> > >>>I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I > >>>use SMTP > >> > >>How do you "directly se

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
On 07/28/2016 07:39 PM, dale wrote: On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I use SMTP How do you "directly send" without using SMTP? with the default sending mechanism that came with i

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I use SMTP How do you "directly send" without using SMTP? with the default sending mechanism that came with it before I configured SMTP variables

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: > I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I > use SMTP How do you "directly send" without using SMTP? -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I don't understand at the

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
On 07/28/2016 01:46 PM, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote: dale writes: my ISP doesn't allow direct email set smtp_url="smtp://d...@dalekelly.org@smtpout.secureserver.net:25" I get the following messages Connecting to smtpout.secureserver.net... Could not connect to smtpout.secureserver.ne

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread hymie
dale writes: >my ISP doesn't allow direct email >set smtp_url="smtp://d...@dalekelly.org@smtpout.secureserver.net:25" >I get the following messages >Connecting to smtpout.secureserver.net... >Could not connect to smtpout.secureserver.net (Interrupted system call). It's very likely that your ISP

mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
manager I copied /etc/Muttrc to ~/.muttrc and like before added set realname="Dale" set from="d...@dalekelly.org" set smtp_url="smtp://d...@dalekelly.org@smtpout.secureserver.net:25" set smtp_pass="password" set pop_host="pop://d...@dalekelly.org@po

Re: POP? (read some docs first)

2014-11-11 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:29:12PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: > On 11/10/2014 05:58 PM, DaleKelly wrote: > >Login failed. Command USER is not supported by server. > > APOP authentication failed. > proceeds the above error > > although it works!!! > > don't like errors, any help appreciated much >

Re: Now Pop...

2014-11-11 Thread John Long
Why use an MTA when Mutt can do SMTP? This is way simpler than the alternatives. Just lett mutt do it all! > > i'm halfway there (i can get things from my ISP, but i haven't figured out > > exim4 to my ISP connection yet). Totally unnecessary unless you feel like being a mail server admin in addi

Re: POP? (read some docs first)

2014-11-11 Thread John Long
y pop_authenticators unless you specifically need to. That doesn't happen often. OTOH if you didn't mess this up with some config error then perhaps it is normal as mutt tries various authentication methods (see doc) from most secure to least secure. > > If I recall correctly, POP

Re: Now Pop...

2014-11-10 Thread Russell Harris
On Mon, November 10, 2014 10:25 pm, beni wrote: > hello, > > thank you for your answers regarding mutt and pop3 mail in mutt.user, > they've given me at least a chance of getting everything working that i > need to get going. :) > > i'm halfway there (i can get things from my ISP, but i haven't fi

Re: now POP ...

2014-11-10 Thread Chris Bannister
tain what you wrote above. Sample pop3 > >> configuration for getmail just in case you are interested: > > > > thanks, I'll archive this in case I can't get the POP in mutt to work, > > especially want to leave a copy of the messages on the server > >

Re: POP? (read some docs first)

2014-11-10 Thread Russell Harris
like errors, any help appreciated much If I recall correctly, POP interface was added to Mutt as an afterthought. A search on "mutt retrieve pop" reveals that others have found Mutt in the role of retrieving messages from a POP server to be problematic. But why waste time with a Mutt funct

Re: POP? (read some docs first)

2014-11-10 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/10/2014 05:58 PM, DaleKelly wrote: Login failed. Command USER is not supported by server. APOP authentication failed. proceeds the above error although it works!!! don't like errors, any help appreciated much I'll write a full HOWTO on Ubuntu Mutt on my website below and post it to th

POP? (read some docs first)

2014-11-10 Thread DaleKelly
read "?" on mutt read POP in Mutt docs searched Ubuntu wiki searched google I get Login failed. Command USER is not supported by server. SSL/TLS seemes to make a connection before the error comes up SMTP with SSL/TLS works fine abook is working fine "?" on my Ubuntu reposit

Re: now POP ...

2014-11-10 Thread Russell Harris
o obtain what you wrote above. Sample pop3 >>> configuration for getmail just in case you are interested: >> >> thanks, I'll archive this in case I can't get the POP in mutt to work, >> especially want to leave a copy of the messages on the server &

Re: now POP ...

2014-11-10 Thread Russell Harris
case you are interested: > > thanks, I'll archive this in case I can't get the POP in mutt to work, > especially want to leave a copy of the messages on the server That is the function of the "delete" command; simply specify "delete=false'. Getmail is a marvelous

Re: now POP ...

2014-11-09 Thread DaleKelly
l just in case you are interested: thanks, I'll archive this in case I cn't get the POP in mutt to work, especially want to leave a copy of the messages on the server -- (my whereabouts below) http://www.dalekelly.org/

Re: now POP ...

2014-11-09 Thread Francesco Ariis
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:54:19PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: > want to pull the mail > want to store/open old messages on the client side > nothing fancy I use getmail [1] to obtain what you wrote above. Sample pop3 configuration for getmail just in case you are interested: [options] verbos

now POP ...

2014-11-09 Thread DaleKelly
got my SMTP working as I want, except debugging why SSL/TLS doesn't work, I'm waiting for a reply as to how to debug may as well ask about POP while I am reading docs I am using mutt 1.5.21-6.4ubuntu2 from the repository before I read any mail I want configure to make sure copies a

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/04/2014 09:16 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: Your claims of many years of linux history are very suspect. I said I was a hack ... -- (my whereabouts below) http://www.dalekelly.org/

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* DaleKelly [11-04-14 20:43]: > On 11/04/2014 07:02 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > >The repository version has been found to be suitable by > >many, many different users. No one has been able to get > >your hand built version to work. > > > >Please consider the likelyhood that your previous problems >

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/04/2014 07:02 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: The repository version has been found to be suitable by many, many different users. No one has been able to get your hand built version to work. Please consider the likelyhood that your previous problems with the repository version were due to your unf

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread Jon LaBadie
t;> > >>>I get this > >>> > >>>mutt -v | grep -i smtp > >>>Configure options: '--enable-pop' '--enable-smtp' '--with-sasl' > >>>'--with-ssl' > >>>+USE_POP -USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP >

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/04/2014 12:37 PM, Joshua Smith wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:31:26PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: >On 11/04/2014 09:19 AM, Joshua Smith wrote: > >mutt -v | grep -i smtp > >I get this > >mutt -v | grep -i smtp >Configure options: '--enable-pop' '-

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread Joshua Smith
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:31:26PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: > On 11/04/2014 09:19 AM, Joshua Smith wrote: > >mutt -v | grep -i smtp > > I get this > > mutt -v | grep -i smtp > Configure options: '--enable-pop' '--enable-smtp' '--with-sasl'

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/04/2014 09:19 AM, Joshua Smith wrote: mutt -v | grep -i smtp I get this mutt -v | grep -i smtp Configure options: '--enable-pop' '--enable-smtp' '--with-sasl' '--with-ssl' +USE_POP -USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP -- (my whereabouts below) http://www.dalekelly.org/

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread Joshua Smith
; '--with-mailpath=/var/mail' '--disable-dependency-tracking' '--enable-compressed' '--enable-debug' '--enable-fcntl' '--enable-hcache' '--enable-gpgme' '--enable-imap' '--enable-smtp' '--enable-pop'

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/04/2014 06:56 AM, John Long wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:40:57PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: On 11/03/2014 05:18 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: You'll need to re-do the configure, build, install steps: [cd to mutt source directory] $ ./configure --enable-smtp $ make $ sudo make install pre

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/04/2014 01:37 AM, John Niendorf wrote: Install from the repository and configure the .muttrc file (I would put that file in ~/) This should avoid any problems like mutt not being configured for SMTP. Ubuntu 14.04 LTS the repository doesn't work either I'm down to just: smtp_user SASL a

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-04 Thread John Long
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:40:57PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: > On 11/03/2014 05:18 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > >You'll need to re-do the configure, build, install steps: > > > >[cd to mutt source directory] > > > >$ ./configure --enable-smtp > >$ make > >$ sudo make install > > previous errors are go

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread John Niendorf
I have to ask. Dale what distro are you using? Why are you trying to install mutt from scratch when there is probably a fine version in the repository? Install from the repository and configure the .muttrc file (I would put that file in ~/) This should avoid any problems like mutt not being confi

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 09:43 PM, DaleKelly wrote: sudo apt-get install libsasl2-2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done libsasl2-2 is already the newest version. already there, maybe need a link in my .muttrc tried --with-sasl[=PFX] on configure tried

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 08:44 PM, DaleKelly wrote: On 11/03/2014 08:35 PM, Tom Furie wrote: If you are building 1.5.23 ignore everything about the older versions mentioned here. everything in 1.5.1.23 working except SMTP authentication requires SASL sudo apt-get install libsasl2-2 Reading package lis

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* DaleKelly [11-03-14 20:52]: [...] > > apologies Patrick, I have a short attention span and tend to hack at > some point And we still have no knowledge :^( You have not answered the questons that provide information necessary to assist you. ??? -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, I

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 05:21 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * DaleKelly [11-03-14 16:33]: On 11/03/2014 02:45 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: You are rolling your own, did you compile it in ??? I did with POP and IMAP enabled, 1.5.1.23 I have: +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP but I install a package built

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 08:35 PM, Tom Furie wrote: If you are building 1.5.23 ignore everything about the older versions mentioned here. everything in 1.5.1.23 working except SMTP authentication requires SASL -- (my whereabouts below) http://www.dalekelly.org/

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 05:18 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: You'll need to re-do the configure, build, install steps: [cd to mutt source directory] $ ./configure --enable-smtp $ make $ sudo make install previous errors are gone, but it now says smtp needs SASL -- (my whereabouts below) http://www.dalekelly

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Tom Furie
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:32:32PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: > I did with POP and IMAP enabled, 1.5.1.23 Do you mean 1.5.23? This is the latest version available. > I am using one from distribution, its 1.5.1.6 Do you mean 1.5.16, or 1.5.6i? Version 1.5.16 is from around 2007, 1.5.6i i

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* DaleKelly [11-03-14 16:33]: > On 11/03/2014 02:45 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >You are rolling your own, did you compile it in ??? > > I did with POP and IMAP enabled, 1.5.1.23 > > > > >I have: +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP > >but I install a package

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2014-11-03, DaleKelly wrote: > no, doesn't look like SMTP support > > and all it says is that "pop is enabled" no +USE_POP or +USE_POP or -USE_POP You'll need to re-do the configure, build, install steps: [cd to mutt source directory] $ ./configure --enable-sm

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
smtp_host=smtp://u...@smtpout.secureserver.net:80 set pop_host=pop://u...@pop.secureserver.net:110 (can't use port 25 for my SMTP server, 80 works on Thunderbird, trying to get a lower memory footprint for email/news, have problems with desktop switcher) get these errors dale@dale-W3653:~$

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 02:45 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: You are rolling your own, did you compile it in ??? I did with POP and IMAP enabled, 1.5.1.23 I have: +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP but I install a package built for my distro. I am using one from distribution, its 1.5.1.6 when I do, mutt

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
ns > > set smtp_host=smtp://u...@smtpout.secureserver.net:80 > set pop_host=pop://u...@pop.secureserver.net:110 > > (can't use port 25 for my SMTP server, 80 works on Thunderbird, > trying to get a lower memory footprint for email/news, have problems > with desktop switcher) > >

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Patrick Shanahan
ttrc file > > > >with these additions > > > >set smtp_host=smtp://u...@smtpout.secureserver.net:80 > >set pop_host=pop://u...@pop.secureserver.net:110 > > > >(can't use port 25 for my SMTP server, 80 works on Thunderbird, trying > >to get a lower memory

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 12:55 PM, DaleKelly wrote: On 11/03/2014 11:41 AM, John Niendorf wrote: Just a note: ~/ is shorthand for/home/dale/ installed from repository, more recent set up my ~/.muttrc file with these additions set smtp_host=smtp://u...@smtpout.secureserver.net:80 set pop_host=pop://u

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 11:41 AM, John Niendorf wrote: Just a note: ~/ is shorthand for/home/dale/ installed from repository, more recent set up my ~/.muttrc file with these additions set smtp_host=smtp://u...@smtpout.secureserver.net:80 set pop_host=pop://u...@pop.secureserver.net:110 (can'

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Chris Green
de a .muttrc file, out of sample.muttrc, with your input on > > pop/smtp, does not deliver mail, probably have to look at where this > > file should be, put it where sample.muttrc was > > yes, you are very confused. You need ~/.muttrc or ~/.mutt/.muttrc > either will work. > It's ~/.mutt/muttrc -- Chris Green

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 11:41 AM, John Niendorf wrote: Just a note: ~/ is shorthand for/home/dale/ thanks John, I had a little on the job Unix, and have been hacking at Linux for about 15 years, but my attention span isn't as good as it used to be -- (my whereabouts below) http://www.dalekelly.org/

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread John Niendorf
s using >>> for config info. >> >> made a .muttrc file, out of sample.muttrc, with your input on >> pop/smtp, does not deliver mail, probably have to look at where this >> file should be, put it where sample.muttrc was > > yes, you are very confused. You need ~/.mutt

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* DaleKelly [11-03-14 11:23]: > On 11/03/2014 04:51 AM, John Long wrote: > >You need to resolve this issue or you will have no idea what mutt is using > >for config info. > > made a .muttrc file, out of sample.muttrc, with your input on > pop/smtp, does not deliver mail,

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/03/2014 04:51 AM, John Long wrote: You need to resolve this issue or you will have no idea what mutt is using for config info. made a .muttrc file, out of sample.muttrc, with your input on pop/smtp, does not deliver mail, probably have to look at where this file should be, put it where

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread John Long
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 07:28:06PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: > On 11/02/2014 06:53 PM, John Niendorf wrote: > >Dale, > > > >For what it is worth I have this in my .muttrc file and I am able to > >send and receive securly to my server. I am using muttrc rather than .muttrc so you should check for bot

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-03 Thread Chris Green
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 06:56:35PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote: > On 11/02/2014 06:19 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >*Should* be ~/.muttrc but if that does not exist, mutt will default to > >/etc/muttrc > > > >My openSUSE system does not have /etc/muttrc > > can't gedit ~/.muttrc (nothing there) > no

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-02 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* DaleKelly [11-02-14 18:59]: > On 11/02/2014 06:19 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >*Should* be ~/.muttrc but if that does not exist, mutt will default to > >/etc/muttrc > > > >My openSUSE system does not have /etc/muttrc > > can't gedit ~/.muttrc (nothing there) > no /muttrc folder in /etc > >

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-02 Thread DaleKelly
't find my .muttrc file (might have edited it before, can't remember now) tried your suggestion for smtp_url, didn't work I install 1.5.23 with pop and IMAP enabled, I didn't see an enable for smtp in the README or INSTALL file also reinstalled a couple times

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-02 Thread DaleKelly
On 11/02/2014 06:19 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: *Should* be ~/.muttrc but if that does not exist, mutt will default to /etc/muttrc My openSUSE system does not have /etc/muttrc can't gedit ~/.muttrc (nothing there) no /muttrc folder in /etc tried putting the "mailboxes" edit in from of my smt

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-02 Thread John Niendorf
Dale, For what it is worth I have this in my .muttrc file and I am able to send and receive securly to my server. set smtp_url="smtps://j...@jfniendorf.org@secure_server.com/465" -- John

Re: pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-02 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* DaleKelly [11-02-14 18:00]: > I tried on the #mutt channel with no answer > I tried the suggestions on comp.mail.mutt group > > I am trying to add secure pop and secure smtp in my 1.5.23 Muttrc > file (I can't find my .muttrc file and I think I may have edited > before)

pop(s),smtp(s)

2014-11-02 Thread DaleKelly
I tried on the #mutt channel with no answer I tried the suggestions on comp.mail.mutt group I am trying to add secure pop and secure smtp in my 1.5.23 Muttrc file (I can't find my .muttrc file and I think I may have edited before) here are the only lines I added to my Muttrc file tha

Re: inbuilt pop and procmail

2014-06-24 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:59:59AM +0530, Srikrishan Malik wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:47:45PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > * Srikrishan Malik [06-24-14 02:02]: > > > I am using the inbuilt pop and smtp for gmail. > > > Is there a way to forward all rece

Re: inbuilt pop and procmail

2014-06-24 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Srikrishan Malik [06-24-14 23:30]: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:47:45PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > * Srikrishan Malik [06-24-14 02:02]: > > > I am using the inbuilt pop and smtp for gmail. > > > Is there a way to forward all received emails from pop serve

Re: inbuilt pop and procmail

2014-06-24 Thread Srikrishan Malik
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:47:45PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Srikrishan Malik [06-24-14 02:02]: > > I am using the inbuilt pop and smtp for gmail. > > Is there a way to forward all received emails from pop server to > > procmail instead of putting those to th

Re: inbuilt pop and procmail

2014-06-24 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Srikrishan Malik [06-24-14 02:02]: > I am using the inbuilt pop and smtp for gmail. > Is there a way to forward all received emails from pop server to > procmail instead of putting those to the spoolfile? Not directly using mutt, but a simple matter using fetchmail or another mail

inbuilt pop and procmail

2014-06-23 Thread Srikrishan Malik
Hello, I am using the inbuilt pop and smtp for gmail. Is there a way to forward all received emails from pop server to procmail instead of putting those to the spoolfile? Thanks Sri

Re: Retrieve POP mail automatically?

2012-12-16 Thread John Long
Dale wrote: > http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html > > Item 4.10 > > I think the item you want is the pop_checkinterval variable > > The default is 60 seconds Thanks I just tried that after I posted my previous response. It doesn't work either (but it sure looked like it should!)

Re: Retrieve POP mail automatically?

2012-12-16 Thread Patrick Shanahan
t cases. Or an alternative to imap and/or retaining pop mail on server. I dl *all* mail to my local box and ssh from outside to an active screen/tmux session. This way I can keep all my mail in a manner I want and still see it from anywhere from any internet connected computer. And the persi

Re: Retrieve POP mail automatically?

2012-12-16 Thread John Long
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:37:29AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote: > On 12/16/2012 10:37 AM, John Long wrote: > > Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather > > than using fetchmail etc.? > > > > Thanks. > > > > /jl > > >

Re: Retrieve POP mail automatically?

2012-12-16 Thread Dale Raby
On 12/16/2012 10:37 AM, John Long wrote: > Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather > than using fetchmail etc.? > > Thanks. > > /jl > The short answer is "yes". The long answer is, maybe, if your particular Mutt is compiled with th

Retrieve POP mail automatically?

2012-12-16 Thread John Long
Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather than using fetchmail etc.? Thanks. /jl -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD and proprietary/ \http://www.mutt.org attachments

Odd keymapping after failed /aborted attempt to open POP account

2012-08-27 Thread Christoph Möbius
I have a multi-account scenario where I use an IMAP folder as main account and have several POP accounts for minor communication / spam box. Assumme that opening the IMAP folder is mapped to the F2 key and opening the POP accounts to some other F-keys. Recently, the POP provider changed its

Re: server pop

2011-01-06 Thread du yang
Hi, sorry for a typing error in the last post. it should be, account-hook pop://us...@pop.free.fr:110/ 'set pop_user=USER1 pop_pass=***' account-hook pop://us...@pop.free.fr:110/ 'set pop_user=USER2 pop_pass=***' - du yang

Re: server pop

2011-01-06 Thread du yang
Hello, if you have two accounts on the same server, you may set the account-hooks like this, account-hook pop://us...@pop.free.fr:110/ 'set pop_user=USER1 pop_pass=***' account-hook pop://us...@pop.free.fr:110/ 'set pop_user=USER1 pop_pass=***' hope it could help you. - du

server pop

2011-01-06 Thread Stéphane Ortega
Hello, I'm a french and novice user of mutt. I would like to know how to configure mutt for received messages from two server pop. I've put in my muttrc : set pop_host=pop.free.fr:110 account-hook . 'unset pop_user; unset pop_pass; unset tunnel' account-hook pop://pop.free.f

Re: configuring POP server access

2010-05-24 Thread Paul E Condon
:set pop_host="pop://pecon...@mesanetworks.net@pop.everyone.com" and then uppercase G command. I get a request for my password, which I answer (proves that Pop support is compiled into my particular Mutt) Some progress reports ending in PASS: Authorization failed. I have also tried ins

Re: configuring POP server access

2010-05-24 Thread JP Bruns
pecon...@mesanetworks.net When using fetchmail I use the fully qualified email address as my userID I know my password for sure because it is passed the fetchmail command, and that works. I have something similar, that is, an email as a username. I have tried :set pop_host="pop://

Re: configuring POP server access [SOLVED] Stupid typing error

2010-05-24 Thread Paul E Condon
he G command. > > The URL of the server is pop.everyone.com > My email address is pecon...@mesanetworks.net > When using fetchmail I use the fully qualified email address as my userID > I know my password for sure because it is passed the fetchmail command, > and that works. > >

configuring POP server access

2010-05-24 Thread Paul E Condon
fetchmail I use the fully qualified email address as my userID I know my password for sure because it is passed the fetchmail command, and that works. I have tried :set pop_host="pop://pecon...@mesanetworks.net@pop.everyone.com" and then uppercase G command. I get a request for my passwor

Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-20 Thread Michael
* Russell Urquhart [2009-04-19 11:28:23 -0500]: > > > > I doubt many people use the function to download POP mail > > using mutt since there're some specialized mail download tools. Why not > > use of them? > > So if i used something like fetchmail to ge

Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-19 Thread Russell Urquhart
> > I doubt many people use the function to download POP mail > using mutt since there're some specialized mail download tools. Why not > use of them? So if i used something like fetchmail to get the mail and then let mutt view the mails, would more less enable to do what

Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-19 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Sunday, April 19 at 04:25 PM, quoth Rocco Rutte: > > Remembering which messages are really new is basically easy to solve > > except one thing: mutt already supports two very different types of > > optional caches. I don't know whether it makes sense to add yet >

Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-19 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, April 19 at 04:25 PM, quoth Rocco Rutte: > Remembering which messages are really new is basically easy to solve > except one thing: mutt already supports two very different types of > optional caches. I don't know whether it makes sense to

Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-19 Thread Rocco Rutte
e server if one configures them to. In mutt, when you open a POP mailbox, it does the same thing: leave mail on the server (except you delete it), fetch messages just once (with header and/or body caching) etc. It even should support distinction between unread and new messages which other clients

Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-19 Thread Russell Urquhart
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:46:39PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > Well, it supports UIDL only for normal folder operations. LAST is only > used for the function. For UIDL to work with , > mutt would need to cache all UIDLs it already saw. > > It doesn't even support body cache, which could

Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-19 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Saturday, April 18 at 03:29 PM, quoth Russell Urquhart: > > I read through the docs and set the pop_last = yes, thinking this would > > force mutt not to redownload messages it already has downloaded. > > Generally, mutt should avoid downloading messages it knows

Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-18 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, April 18 at 03:29 PM, quoth Russell Urquhart: > I am accessing my pop via smtp and everything is working fine. ??? That sentence is very hard to understand. Your pop? It either sounds like you said "I'm accessing my http v

pop-last=yes isn't working?

2009-04-18 Thread Russell Urquhart
Hi All, I am accessing my pop via smtp and everything is working fine. Whenever i download mail, it asks if i want to delete them from the server. If i don't the next time i check, mutt has downlaoded them again. If i DO remove them from the server, my phone, or web access cannot find those

  1   2   3   >