On Mon, November 10, 2014 4:24 am, Russell Harris wrote:
> On Sun, November 9, 2014 11:36 pm, DaleKelly wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/2014 12:20 AM, Francesco Ariis wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:54:19PM -0500, DaleKelly wrote:
>>> I use getmail [1] to obtain what you wrote above. Sample pop3
>>> configuration for getmail just in case you are interested:
>>
>> thanks, I'll archive this in case I can't get the POP in mutt to work,
>> especially want to leave a copy of the messages on the server
>
> That is the function of the "delete" command; simply specify
> "delete=false".
>
>
> Getmail is a marvelous package which provides excellent control, such as
> limiting the number of messages downloaded in a single session.  And
> getmail can log each transaction (which is to say, each message
> downloaded).  Also, getmail can pass downloaded messages to maildrop for
> sorting.

An additional consideration: Strive for both simplicity and
reliability, and consider the difficulty of diagnostic and future
expansion of functionality.  And do not make the mistake of equating
simplicity with a minimal number of packages.

>From the standpoint of ease of maintenance and diagnostics, a collection
of single-function tools often is a better solution than is a single
multi-function tool; this is true of the combination of getmail and Mutt,
as opposed to Mutt configured to fetch messages from a POP3 server.

And the use of maildrop to categorize messages into different directories
is a great time-saver, because Mutt can open only the directories (such as
"mutt-users") in which you are interested at the moment, eliminating the
necessity of looking at every incoming message each time you stop to check
mail.

RLH



Reply via email to