On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 03:00:15AM +0200, Nickolai Dobrynin wrote:
> I would like to press 'y' (), leave the mutt
> session idle, and still be notified of new mail. Is this possible?
...
> Entering a mailbox (any mailbox) does get me notified, but not until
> I leave the m
I would like to press 'y' (), leave the mutt session idle, and
still be notified of new mail. Is this possible?
I use isync. Sync'ing my mail ahead of time and subsequently running
'mutt -y' works as expected, but I get no further notifications.
Entering a mailbox
next mailbox with new messages (or unread, but that's
not too important) when there are no more in the current mailbox?
Not exactly what you want, but did you try the next-unread-mailbox
function?
Hmmm. I knew there was *some* command like that, I did not remember
it or how to find it this
key in the pager keymap)
> > > go to the next mailbox with new messages (or unread, but that's
> > > not too important) when there are no more in the current mailbox?
>
> > Not exactly what you want, but did you try the next-unread-mailbox
> > function?
&
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 11:35:42PM +, Christian Ebert wrote:
> > is there a way to make the command which moves to the next new or
> > unread message in the pager (bound to Tab key in the pager keymap)
> > go to the next mailbox with new messages (or unread, but that'
* googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org on Wednesday, December 11, 2024 at 09:34:08
-0800:
is there a way to make the command which moves to the next new or
unread message in the pager (bound to Tab key in the pager keymap) go
to the next mailbox with new messages (or unread, but that's no
Dear list,
is there a way to make the command which moves to the next new or
unread message in the pager (bound to Tab key in the pager keymap) go
to the next mailbox with new messages (or unread, but that's not too
important) when there are no more in the current mailbox?
Right now it p
't easily express what you want with a collection of
> save hooks in the right order with clever patterns.
My main purpose is to group threads in the same mailbox. For that, the
external command will have an index of all the message-id in my
archives, as people can reply months later. That w
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Hi.
I want to use an external command to decide in what mailbox to save
messages.
When I hit ‘s’ with its default action of save-message, mutt asks
“Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =ml/debian”, with the default being
c
On 30Jul2023 15:59, Nicolas George wrote:
I want to use an external command to decide in what mailbox to save
messages.
When I hit ‘s’ with its default action of save-message, mutt asks
“Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =ml/debian”, with the default being
chosen from save-hooks o
Hi.
I want to use an external command to decide in what mailbox to save
messages.
When I hit ‘s’ with its default action of save-message, mutt asks
“Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =ml/debian”, with the default being
chosen from save-hooks or from the author of the mail.
What I want
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:47:44AM +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
> Multi-threaded GUI version coming up any time soon? ;-)
Let's hope not. That would massively increase Mutt's attack surface and
the burden on its maintainer.
People who really want to expose themselves to the risk that
multi-thre
* Kevin J. McCarthy [2023-03-14 19:16]:
> > After reading the fine manual, I don't see an immediate way to disable
> > trash. Assuming I'll have to move it to IMAP then. Which is fine, just
> > wondering if trash could be disabled as I don't really need it.
>
> $trash starts out empty, so there
* Patrick Shanahan [2023-03-14 12:56]:
> > After reading the fine manual, I don't see an immediate way to disable
> > trash. Assuming I'll have to move it to IMAP then. Which is fine, just
> > wondering if trash could be disabled as I don't really need it.
>
> you haven't gone deep enough.
[sni
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 08:40:24AM +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
After reading the fine manual, I don't see an immediate way to disable
trash. Assuming I'll have to move it to IMAP then. Which is fine, just
wondering if trash could be disabled as I don't really need it.
$trash starts out empty,
* Vegard Svanberg [03-14-23 03:41]:
> * Kevin J. McCarthy [2023-03-13 21:07]:
>
> > Do you mean the 2000 emails you want to delete, or the half-million emails
> > in the mailbox?
>
> The 2000 I want to delete, yes. :-)
>
> > If it's the first, it sounds
* Dan Ritter [2023-03-14 00:29]:
> You could:
> * operate on local storage with mutt -f Maildir/
That's actually slower than letting Dovecot handling it...
> or
> * build lists with doveadm-search and delete with
> doveadm-expunge
That's a good idea, I'll look into that. Thanks.
>
* Kevin J. McCarthy [2023-03-13 21:07]:
> Do you mean the 2000 emails you want to delete, or the half-million emails
> in the mailbox?
The 2000 I want to delete, yes. :-)
> If it's the first, it sounds as if Mutt thinks the value in $trash is not
> the same server as th
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 08:47:14AM +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
Latest mutt on local IMAP (Dovecot).
My mailbox is rather busy (and contains around half a million emails).
Say I want to delete 2000 emails.
I tag them, ;d and press X to expunge. Mutt starts fetching every email
(not sure why
On 03/13 08:47, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Latest mutt on local IMAP (Dovecot).
>
> My mailbox is rather busy (and contains around half a million emails).
>
> Say I want to delete 2000 emails.
>
> I tag them, ;d and press X to expunge. Mutt starts fetching
Hi,
Latest mutt on local IMAP (Dovecot).
My mailbox is rather busy (and contains around half a million emails).
Say I want to delete 2000 emails.
I tag them, ;d and press X to expunge. Mutt starts fetching every email
(not sure why that is - does it have to?), then would normally remove
them
> On 2022-08-11 02:22, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 10Aug2022 11:10, todd zullinger wrote:
Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
When I delete my custom macro, and revert "q" to its default action,
then I get this message when exiting from mutt (case 2):
Purge 1 deleted message? ([yes]/no):
Aye, what t
On 10Aug2022 11:10, todd zullinger wrote:
>Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
>> When I delete my custom macro, and revert "q" to its default action,
>> then I get this message when exiting from mutt (case 2):
>>
>> Purge 1 deleted message? ([yes]/no):
>>
>> When I create custom macro to sync automatical
Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> I am using mutt in 2 modes:
>
> 1) mutt -R -f folder
> 2) mutt-f folder
>
> In case 1), pressing "q" should simply exit. This is read-only mode and
> there are no messages to be deleted.
>
> In case 2), pressing "q" should exit while also automatically deletin
On 2022-08-08 22:15, Derek Martin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 08:15:31AM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
Hello,
I have custom macro "q" for exit:
macro index q ";"
but when I open mailbox read-only, I am not able to exit from mutt:
AFAICT this macro does nothin
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 08:15:31AM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have custom macro "q" for exit:
>
> macro index q ";"
>
> but when I open mailbox read-only, I am not able to exit from mutt:
AFAICT this macro does nothing usef
Hello,
I have custom macro "q" for exit:
macro index q ";"
but when I open mailbox read-only, I am not able to exit from mutt:
Mailbox is read-only.
the key "q' does not work.
is there any workaround to solve this?
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 05:48:55AM +, Sam Lee via Mutt-users wrote:
Is there some kind of setting similar to
"set sidebar_use_mailbox_shortcuts=no", but for the mailbox browser?
'unset browser_abbreviate_mailboxes' might work for you.
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerp
On 2022-06-03 05:48 +, Sam Lee via Mutt-users wrote:
> In the sidebar, my mailbox is displayed in a format like
> "imaps://john-...@example.com/INBOX". However, in the mailbox browser
> (accessed using keybinding 'y' or :exec browse-mailboxes), it is
> displ
In the sidebar, my mailbox is displayed in a format like
"imaps://john-...@example.com/INBOX". However, in the mailbox browser
(accessed using keybinding 'y' or :exec browse-mailboxes), it is
displayed as "=INBOX". In the mailbox browser, how do I make Mu
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:46:53PM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
> I successfully use the below approach for syncing current folder with
> the same on IMAP:
> ---
> folder-hook . "source ~/.mutt/on-folder-change.muttrc"
> ---
>
> where on-folder-change.muttrc is:
> ---
> set record = ^
> set my_f
an 27, 2022 at 05:31:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> Is there a way of accessing the current mailbox name (i.e. for maildir
> the directory name) in mutt?
IIRC, the caret symbol (^) can be used as a shortcut for the current
mailbox.
Possibly relevant sections of the manual:
http://www.mutt.o
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 06:07:39PM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 05:31:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > Is there a way of accessing the current mailbox name (i.e. for maildir
> > the directory name) in mutt?
>
> IIRC, the caret symbol (^) can be used
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 05:31:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> Is there a way of accessing the current mailbox name (i.e. for maildir
> the directory name) in mutt?
IIRC, the caret symbol (^) can be used as a shortcut for the current
mailbox.
Possibly relevant sections of the manual:
Is there a way of accessing the current mailbox name (i.e. for maildir
the directory name) in mutt?
This is so I can put it in things like a 'set editor='
command to pass to the 'editor'.
--
Chris Green
t;
> > Well I have now and it doesn't appear to work.
> >
> > I have put the following in my muttrc file:-
> >
> > folder-hook . set mbox_type=maildir
> > folder-hook 'folder/.*' set mbox_type=mbox
> >
> > ... and when I save mail in the folder hierarchy it's still in maildir
> > format.
> >
> ... and I have also tried:-
>
> folder-hook . set mbox_type=maildir
> folder-hook '~/mail/folder/.*' set mbox_type=mbox
>
> It still doesn't work.
>
On thinking about it this isn't likely to work as folder-hook gets
actioned when reading the mailbox. I'm not reading the mailbox, I'm
saving to it. What I want is a save-hook that allows me to set the
mbox_type.
--
Chris Green
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 09:15:06PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:30:35PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Chris Green [06-24-21 12:16]:
> > > It's a bit difficult to explain this.
> > >
> > > Is it possible for a folder-hook RE to apply to all mailboxes in a
> > > sub
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:30:35PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris Green [06-24-21 12:16]:
> > It's a bit difficult to explain this.
> >
> > Is it possible for a folder-hook RE to apply to all mailboxes in a
> > sub-directory?
> >
> > E.g. can one produce an RE for all the sub-directori
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:30:35PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris Green [06-24-21 12:16]:
> > It's a bit difficult to explain this.
> >
> > Is it possible for a folder-hook RE to apply to all mailboxes in a
> > sub-directory?
> >
> > E.g. can one produce an RE for all the sub-directori
* Chris Green [06-24-21 12:16]:
> It's a bit difficult to explain this.
>
> Is it possible for a folder-hook RE to apply to all mailboxes in a
> sub-directory?
>
> E.g. can one produce an RE for all the sub-directories of ~/mail/folder?
> All my actual mailboxes are two levels further down:-
>
It's a bit difficult to explain this.
Is it possible for a folder-hook RE to apply to all mailboxes in a
sub-directory?
E.g. can one produce an RE for all the sub-directories of ~/mail/folder?
All my actual mailboxes are two levels further down:-
./folder/france
./folder/france/jobs
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Genética wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:43:39AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:35:25AM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote:
# Need to upgrade to > 1.8.0 (setenv)
folder-hook . 'set my_folder=$folder;set folder="XX
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:14:31AM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
'full' is the name of my mbsync channel defined in ~/.mbsynrc:
---
# full set of mailboxes
Channel full
...
---
It was just an example that you need to correct according to your mbsync
setup.
I see. I group different channels o
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:02:38AM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
I guess your folder names differ from mine. You can debug step by step,
start from keeping only the first assignment:
---
set record = ^
---
Launch mutt and check the result pressing :echo $record
Then, you can adjust the sed patt
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:58:22PM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Genética wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:26:54AM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
Then what should I do to mbsync the current maildir?
Hitting ESC-o doesn't seem to do it.
Yes, it is.
F
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:26:54AM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
Then what should I do to mbsync the current maildir?
Hitting ESC-o doesn't seem to do it.
Yes, it is.
For debug I suggest to simplify macro as:
---
macro index,pa
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Genética wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:26:54AM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
Then what should I do to mbsync the current maildir?
Hitting ESC-o doesn't seem to do it.
Yes, it is.
For debug I suggest to simplify macro as:
---
macro index,pager o "
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:26:54AM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
Then what should I do to mbsync the current maildir?
Hitting ESC-o doesn't seem to do it.
Yes, it is.
For debug I suggest to simplify macro as:
---
macro index,pager o "mbsync full:$record"
Nice. It shows that:
Shell comma
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:16:33PM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:00:35AM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
The below approach works for me, probably it can be helpful somehow:
.muttrc
---
# the very first folder-hook
folder-hook . "source ~/.mutt/on-folder-change.muttrc
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:00:35AM +0300, Oleg A. Mamontov wrote:
The below approach works for me, probably it can be helpful somehow:
.muttrc
---
# the very first folder-hook
folder-hook . "source ~/.mutt/on-folder-change.muttrc"
---
# .mutt/on-folder-change.muttrc
---
set record = ^
set reco
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:43:39AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:35:25AM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote:
# Need to upgrade to > 1.8.0 (setenv)
folder-hook . 'set my_folder=$folder;set fol
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:43:39AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:35:25AM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote:
# Need to upgrade to > 1.8.0 (setenv)
folder-hook . 'set my_folder=$folder;set folder="XXX";set visual=^'
folder-hook . 'setenv MYSYNCFOLDER
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:35:25AM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote:
# Need to upgrade to > 1.8.0 (setenv)
folder-hook . 'set my_folder=$folder;set folder="XXX";set visual=^'
folder-hook . 'setenv MYSYNCFOLDER $visual'
folder-hook . 'set folder=$my_folder'
macr
Hello:
I am trying to build a macro to apply a function to the current maildir,
but I can't find the way to capture the current maildir into a variable.
The idea is as follows: I synch my mail with mbsync, which I run from a
crontab entry at different time intervals for different mail folders
from work etc.
OTOH, if work and personal just forward to some common mail address then
you're in split up the premixed stream, and back into rules of the form
you're already using.
In my case, I pull from a work mailbox into a distinct spool, and
process that spool as "from wor
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:15:10PM +0200, mutt...@mail.com wrote:
What I'd like is that when I press '?' I get a list of *mailboxes*
rather than directories, because, as a user, I'm really not interested
in directories, I only want to know about mailboxes.
I have a couple suggestions. The firs
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 07:33:04 -0700, Felix Finch wrote:
> Out of curiosity, could you show your offlineimap usage? I have a
> manually generated list of mboxes. It doesn't change often, but it
> would be nice to do it "properly". I looked at offlineimap some time
> ago, and again just now, an
On 20200605, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 16:15:10 +0200, mutt...@mail.com wrote:
What I'd like is that when I press '?' I get a list of *mailboxes*
rather than directories, because, as a user, I'm really not interested
in directories, I only want to know about mailboxes.
See the
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:15:10PM +0200, mutt...@mail.com wrote:
What I'd like is that when I press '?' I get a list of *mailboxes*
rather than directories, because, as a user, I'm really not interested
in directories, I only want to know about mailboxes.
I also use the Maildir format and I ge
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 16:15:10 +0200, mutt...@mail.com wrote:
> What I'd like is that when I press '?' I get a list of *mailboxes*
> rather than directories, because, as a user, I'm really not interested
> in directories, I only want to know about mailboxes.
See the `mailboxes` command.
mailbox
rk/
# play
:0:
* ^(From|Cc|To).*someb...@example.org
Play/
# rest
:0
Mail/
When I open Mutt it starts in the Mail mailbox. Okay, fair enough, it
has to start somewhere. But then I press 'c' to change mailbox and, if
I can't remember what mailboxes I have (seriously, I have a *lot*),
c
;
> Marty
>
> On 01/21/20 11:14 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Patrick Shanahan [01-21-20 11:09]:
> > > * Fred Smith [01-21-20 10:59]:
> > > > I've got a mailbox with quite a few msgs in it, some I've never read but
> > > > don
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:08:21AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Fred Smith [01-21-20 10:59]:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I've got a mailbox with quite a few msgs in it, some I've never read but
> > don't want to delete. All those now have a status flag o
* Patrick Shanahan [01-21-20 11:09]:
> >>* Fred Smith [01-21-20 10:59]:
> >>>I've got a mailbox with quite a few msgs in it, some I've never read but
> >>>don't want to delete. All those now have a status flag of "O", so if I
> >>
11:09]:
* Fred Smith [01-21-20 10:59]:
I've got a mailbox with quite a few msgs in it, some I've never read but
don't want to delete. All those now have a status flag of "O", so if I
enter that mailbox when there are no "N" messages in it, mutt goes to the
fir
* Patrick Shanahan [01-21-20 11:09]:
> * Fred Smith [01-21-20 10:59]:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I've got a mailbox with quite a few msgs in it, some I've never read but
> > don't want to delete. All those now have a status flag of "O", so if I
> &g
* Fred Smith [01-21-20 10:59]:
> Hi!
>
> I've got a mailbox with quite a few msgs in it, some I've never read but
> don't want to delete. All those now have a status flag of "O", so if I
> enter that mailbox when there are no "N" messages in it,
Hi!
I've got a mailbox with quite a few msgs in it, some I've never read but
don't want to delete. All those now have a status flag of "O", so if I
enter that mailbox when there are no "N" messages in it, mutt goes to the
first "O" mail.
One way I c
On 10/08/19, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 02:20:32PM +0200, Oliver Graute wrote:
> >folder-hook ^pop 'set read_inc=1'
>
> See <http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#mailbox-hook>
>
> The ^ is being interpreted as a mailbox shortcut, not &qu
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 02:20:32PM +0200, Oliver Graute wrote:
folder-hook ^pop 'set read_inc=1'
See <http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#mailbox-hook>
The ^ is being interpreted as a mailbox shortcut, not "beginning of
string". Instead you can try enclosing the regexp
27;set read_inc=1'
Since a Ubuntu update from 14.04 to 16.04. It's causing the following
error on mutt startup:
Fehler in /home/oliver/.muttrc, Zeile 11: current mailbox shortcut '^' is unset
Fehler in /home/oliver/.muttrc, Zeile 13: current m
Thank you!
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:52:17PM -0500, Hokan wrote:
> >How can I suppress the mailbox creation prompt?
>
> Try 'unset confirmcreate'
--
Hokan
Bicyclist
Sysadmin
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:52:17PM -0500, Hokan wrote:
How can I suppress the mailbox creation prompt?
Try 'unset confirmcreate'
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Mutt users,
I'm getting a mailbox creation prompt that I don't want.
I have a couple of muttrc lines that help me auto-organize my sent and
deleted mail:
set record="+sent-mutt/`date +%Y/%Y-%m`-sent-mail"
set trash="+deleted-mutt/`date +%Y/%Y-%m`-deleted-mail
Well I'm still flummoxed a bit as I'm almost 100% sure nothing has changed
since Mutt was working and now when it doesn't.
That said, I tend to feel it has something to do with Gmail organizing
messages into the tabs. Like maybe Google moving messages somehow seems
like a deletion to Mutt? P
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 10:47:59AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
However, I apologize: you are right. Mutt doesn't stop checking for
new mail, but it looks like it may be discarding the previous
notification. I will take a look at this.
I've added a fix for this in commit e3f66d7e, which wi
ah right. I wasn't thinking – it bounced because of attachment.
It was just a picture of mutt displaying "mailbox unchanged" and Chrome
displaying 4 new messages.
thanks!
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:48 PM Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 09:57:18AM -0700,
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 09:57:18AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:15:10PM -0400, Ben Gold wrote:
And what happens is Mutt ends up giving me this error and then I
can't receive any new mail without quitting and restarting it.
I can't answer what has changed in your e
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:15:10PM -0400, Ben Gold wrote:
And what happens is Mutt ends up giving me this error and then I can't
receive any new mail without quitting and restarting it.
I can't answer what has changed in your environment, but this is not
true. Mutt doesn't enter a state where
ow it seems like whenever I get an email, instead of showing
> >an unread message I just get this error:
> >"mailbox externally modified. flags may be wrong"
> >I haven't changed anything (that I'm aware of) in mutt or in my email
> >habits
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 10:18:10AM -0400, Ben Gold wrote:
>Mutt was working for me (to check my gmail account) for about a
>month.? Now it seems like whenever I get an email, instead of showing
>an unread message I just get this error:
>"mailbox externally modif
n that mutt is aware that
something happened, and that it knows it may no longer be an authoritative
indication of what your mailbox looks like.
--hymie!
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 10:18:10AM -0400, Ben Gold wrote:
> Mutt was working for me (to check my gmail account) for about a month. Now
> it see
Mutt was working for me (to check my gmail account) for about a month. Now
it seems like whenever I get an email, instead of showing an unread message
I just get this error:
"mailbox externally modified. flags may be wrong"
I haven't changed anything (that I'm aware of) in
gt; my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
> course I can't get past without first entering a folder at the
> prompt.
I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the full list.
t; my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
> > course I can't get past without first entering a folder at
> > the
> > prompt.
>
> I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
> for the mailbox name, '?
ut first entering a folder at the
> prompt.
I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the full list. What am I missing? That
sounds like what you want.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._
Hi
if i have a mail selected in the index and want to save and then be prompted to
select one of my mailboxes, how can this be done?
my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
course I can't get past without first entering a folder at the
prompt.
thanks,
--
Ben Fitzgerald
* David J. Weller-Fahy [2018-04-25 21:38 -0400]:
I've been dealing with an error whenever mutt starts for a few years
now, and finally decided to ask how others have fixed the issue.
#v+
folder-hook . "set record=^"
#v-
Sigh... apparently inspiration required that I send an email to a mailing
I've been dealing with an error whenever mutt starts for a few years
now, and finally decided to ask how others have fixed the issue.
I have all my sent email saved in the current mailbox. I do this using
the following setting in my muttrc (per
https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/wikis/Mu
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:12:36AM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 17:29:38 +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> > I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
> > search for messages in the current mailbox. But can we apply this t
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 13:19:22 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> the OP has mbox which notmuch doesn't support
OP said that it's maildir:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:29:38PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Oh, I am using Maildir. So maybe some standalone script will help?
--Ben
* Ben Boeckel [01-18-18 11:40]:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 17:29:38 +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> > I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
> > search for messages in the current mailbox. But can we apply this to
> > multiple
> > mailbo
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 17:29:38 +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
> search for messages in the current mailbox. But can we apply this to multiple
> mailboxes? I would like to search for matched messages in all mail
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:29:38PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
> search for messages in the current mailbox. But can we apply this to multiple
> mailboxes? I would like to search for matched
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:29:38PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
Hi,
I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
search for messages in the current mailbox. But can we apply this to multiple
mailboxes? I would like to search for matched messages in all mailboxes and
* Yubin Ruan [01-18-18 04:31]:
>
> I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
> search for messages in the current mailbox. But can we apply this to multiple
> mailboxes? I would like to search for matched messages in all mailboxes and
> then
Hi Yubin,
Yubin Ruan hat am Thu 18. Jan, 17:49 (+0800) geschrieben:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:29:38PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
> > search for messages in the current mailbo
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:29:38PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
> > search for messages in the current mailbo
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:29:38PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
> search for messages in the current mailbox. But can we apply this to multiple
> mailboxes? I would like to search for matched
Hi,
I know one can hit / or l (i.e., limit) and then apply a search pattern to
search for messages in the current mailbox. But can we apply this to multiple
mailboxes? I would like to search for matched messages in all mailboxes and
then put them into a separate mailbox. For example, I have 10
1 - 100 of 1144 matches
Mail list logo
