On 2018-08-30, nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
> I've been sending GPG-encrypted e-mails with mutt, and I've noticed that
> the key ID selection menu, the one that shows up when there is more than
> one identity in a given recipient's key, is a bit too long for 80
> columns.
>
> This means that, when
I've been sending GPG-encrypted e-mails with mutt, and I've noticed that
the key ID selection menu, the one that shows up when there is more than
one identity in a given recipient's key, is a bit too long for 80
columns.
This means that, when I send encrypted e-mails from an 80-column
terminal, at
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:15:17PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> When I send a GPG-encrypted mail to, say "Foo Bar ",
> and there is a public key for that address in the GPG keyring,
> mutt still asks for a key to use for encryption. Can I tell mutt
> to use the key matching the receiver address au
When I send a GPG-encrypted mail to, say "Foo Bar ",
and there is a public key for that address in the GPG keyring,
mutt still asks for a key to use for encryption. Can I tell mutt
to use the key matching the receiver address automatically?
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
Hi,
when trying to encrypt a message in mutt, pressing "p" brings on the common pgp
dialog:
PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, or (c)lear?
Pressing "e" sets the "encrypt" flag. Then, when sending the mail, I'm asked to
enter a key id. Now, when I hit "ENTER", the listing of my public key
On 14.03.2015, Peter P. wrote:
> how can I configure mutt to always attach my public GPG key to signed
> messages without manually having to ESC-k and selecting the correct key?
Besides exploring mutts macro functionality already mentioned in this thread,
it could be an idea to copy your
* On 17 Mar 2015, Will Yardley wrote:
>
> I've seen other mail clients (Evolution, I think) send the public key
> with every message, but seems a bit of a wste of bndwdth to me. Just put
> a link to your key (or your key-id and keyserver address) in your sig.
+1, if even that. Don't all mail re
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:11:59PM -0500, Chris Sussmann wrote:
> * Peter P. wrote:
> > * Francesco Ariis [2015-03-14 19:58]:
> > > > how can I configure mutt to always attach my public GPG key to
> > > > signed messages without manually having to ESC-k and
* Peter P. wrote:
> * Francesco Ariis [2015-03-14 19:58]:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:14:37AM +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> > > how can I configure mutt to always attach my public GPG key to signed
> > > messages without manually having to ESC-k and selecting the co
* Francesco Ariis [2015-03-14 19:58]:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:14:37AM +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> > how can I configure mutt to always attach my public GPG key to signed
> > messages without manually having to ESC-k and selecting the correct key?
>
> Maybe a macro [1] (
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:14:37AM +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> how can I configure mutt to always attach my public GPG key to signed
> messages without manually having to ESC-k and selecting the correct key?
Maybe a macro [1] (exploiting ) could do?
Have you considered uploading your key to
Hi list,
how can I configure mutt to always attach my public GPG key to signed
messages without manually having to ESC-k and selecting the correct key?
thank you,
P
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 17:17, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> So I've gotten around to generating my own personal GPG key and
>> signing every mail with it. Problem is, I don't know anyone with gpg
>> or pgp, and want my key to be signed. If I understand corr
Hi,
> So I've gotten around to generating my own personal GPG key and
> signing every mail with it. Problem is, I don't know anyone with gpg
> or pgp, and want my key to be signed. If I understand correctly, this
> should be done face to face? Or can someone on this list d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, January 19 at 03:21 PM, quoth ssiza...@gmail.com:
> So I've gotten around to generating my own personal GPG key and
> signing every mail with it. Problem is, I don't know anyone with gpg
> or pgp, and want my key
So I've gotten around to generating my own personal GPG key and
signing every mail with it. Problem is, I don't know anyone with gpg
or pgp, and want my key to be signed. If I understand correctly, this
should be done face to face? Or can someone on this list do it? I'm
fairly new
Joseph wrote:
> According to manual ^K (ctrl-shift-K) is for "extract-key"
> when I tried it, I got:
>
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
> Press any key to continue...
>
> The message was pgp signed.
The keys aren't transmitted with each signed message in t
According to manual ^K (ctrl-shift-K) is for "extract-key"
when I tried it, I got:
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
Press any key to continue...
The message was pgp signed.
--
#Joseph
GPG KeyID: ED0E1FB7
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:59:05PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> ...
Thank you very much for your help... Now everything works
right. I have greatly appreciated your input.
Franz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 25 at 01:16 AM, quoth P.M.:
>Should I set "set pgp_ignore_subkeys=" to "no" (default is "yes"), or
>it does not matter here?
Only unset it if you really need to (i.e. you find that mutt
misbehaves otherwise). *Most* folks shoul
--- Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
OK, I've applied the conditional version:
set pgp_encrypt_only_command="pgpewrap gpg --batch
--quiet --no-verbose --output - --encrypt --textmode
--armor --always-trust %?a? --encrypt-to %a? -- -r %r
-- %f"
set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="pgpewrap gpg
--- Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hopefully, you see what I'm saying...
It's definitely much clearer now, and it's time for me
to apply your advice and experiment with it... I think
I've got it now.
A few quick questions before closing, if you will...
Should I set "set pgp_ignore_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 24 at 10:03 PM, quoth P.M.:
>> Eh? That wouldn't do anything at all in a muttrc, that I'm aware
>> of, and *should* cause mutt to complain. Under what context is that
>> in your muttrc---is it in the middle of a variable setting
--- Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Thank you, it is much appreciated.
> > Now, the code "set pgp --encrypt-to=0x31577172"
> occurs twice in the
> > pgp section of my .muttrc. Within this scheme, do
> I need to include
> > that too in the macro??
>
> Eh? That wouldn't do anything at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 24 at 08:03 AM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Thank you for taking the time to explain...
You're quite welcome.
> Here's what I currently have:
>
> macro generic "2" "set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hostname=yahoo.de realname=my_hdr Bcc:
> Does that make sense?
It makes perfect sense, thanks again for explaining it so clearly.
Fantastic, then, so I just need to replace "0x31577172" at each
occurrence in the .muttrc with "%?a?-u %a?"... with no further need
to modify the macro sequences, as this string automatically points
to the correct gpg key belonging to the current user (which user is
selected as needed through the old macro sequences, unmodified...)
Correct? If affirmative, it is an extremely elegant fix indeed...
Franz
pgpLXdatVLASc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 24 at 12:50 AM, quoth P.M.:
> Thank you very much for your reply.
You're quite welcome.
> I apologize for not being too quick in grasping the advice you just
> gave - being very new to this stuff - so please be patient with
>
--- Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Thank you very much for your reply.
I apologize for not being too quick in grasping the
advice you just gave - being very new to this stuff -
so please be patient with me...
> There are several ways to do it. You could include
> the command to
> c
w can I also include a
>command within each macro that activates the gpg key
>relative to that email address.
>
>This way, I would just assign a variable to the
>various pgp entries in my .muttrc, for instance:
>
>set pgp_sign_as=$UID
>set pgp --encryption-to=$UID
>and so
can I also include a
command within each macro that activates the gpg key
relative to that email address.
This way, I would just assign a variable to the
various pgp entries in my .muttrc, for instance:
set pgp_sign_as=$UID
set pgp --encryption-to=$UID
and so forth
and then assign the value of
Hi,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [04/02/02 01:12:14] wrote:
> Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote:
> > > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at
> > > 11:02:23PM +0200:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen M
--uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote:
> > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote:
> begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote:
> ^
> Is that a styl
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote:
^
Is that a stylistic choice, or is your config broken?
msg26501/pgp0.pgp
Description: P
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote:
> begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:25:20PM +0100:
> > ... but it doesn't help at all if people don't submit their key because
> > of paranoia.
> What's most annoying are the folks who not only don't
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:25:20PM +0100:
>
> ... but it doesn't help at all if people don't submit their key because
> of paranoia.
What's most annoying are the folks who not only don't submit their
key, but they also don't put it on their web page, or they
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23:PM -0500 David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Shawn McMahon said...
> % There's more than one keyserver network.
> So it seems.
> Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really
> know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with eac
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23:PM -0500 David T-G wrote:
> Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really
> know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or
> do even they have problems?
,[ /home/pdmef/.gnupg/options ]-
|
| # Options for
begin quoting what David T-G said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23PM -0500:
>
> Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really
> know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or
> do even they have problems?
I think there are a few, and some of th
Shawn, et al --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin quoting what Martin Karlsson said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:36:32PM +0100:
% > >
% > And I get the same as David. I use 'keyserver pgp.mit.edu'.
% > But you should only have to upload to _one_ keyserver, right?
%
% There's more than
begin quoting what Martin Karlsson said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:36:32PM +0100:
> >
> And I get the same as David. I use 'keyserver pgp.mit.edu'.
> But you should only have to upload to _one_ keyserver, right?
There's more than one keyserver network.
However, it's easier to ask somebody what
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 04.07 GMT -0600]:
[...snip...]
> That's odd, I get the same thing as Shawn:
>
> gpg: Signature made Wed 27 Mar 2002 02:29:20 PM CST using DSA key ID 57C3430B
> gpg: requesting key 57C3430B from wwwkeys.us.pgp.net ...
>
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
> Hi aqain.
> Someone mentioned to me that you could add a header to mails giving the
> location of your gpg public key.
>
> How is this done, or are there some useful docs on the topic?
> I figure I just create a page from the export-key func on my site and
> then p
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Someone mentioned to me that you could add a header to mails giving
> the location of your gpg public key.
>
> How is this done, or are there some useful docs on the topic?
Here's what I have in my .muttrc:
my_hdr X-PGP-Key:
http://pgp.dty
Hi aqain.
Someone mentioned to me that you could add a header to mails giving the
location of your gpg public key.
How is this done, or are there some useful docs on the topic?
I figure I just create a page from the export-key func on my site and
then point people to it?
Cheers
--
Nick Wilson
* Dale Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010618 14:17]:
> I am going to start using gpg (again) and I can't remember how to
> export the key to a keyserver, could someone tell me where I can find
> it? currently I'm using the following command and getting nowhere:
>
> gpg --send-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am going to start using gpg (again) and I can't remember how to
export the key to a keyserver, could someone tell me where I can find
it? currently I'm using the following command and getting nowhere:
gpg --send-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.MASTER.pgp.net.
gpg: www.MASTER.pgp.net.: user not found
* Dave Murray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> BTW, have you PGP/GPG users seen this?:
> http://cryptome.org/pgp-email-flaw.htm
Yes, and I'm not worried. The exploit requires that:
1. The attacker obtain your secret key.
2. The attacker must replace your secret key in its original location
wit
Hi Dave,
I've seen the article about the PGP flaw. :(
Question is, where does that leave PGP/GPG users and the security
issues involved?
Cheers.
Horace
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:40:29PM -0700, Dave Murray wrote:
> Horace G. Friend III wrote on mutt-users:
> > I've got three keys (DSS/DH, RS
Horace G. Friend III wrote on mutt-users:
> I've got three keys (DSS/DH, RSA and DSS/ElGamal) and I can sign with
> any that I choose by selecting the "save as" option. I am prompted for
> which key to use. All my keys have the same userid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and
> I select the key by their keyid.
Hi Dave,
I've got three keys (DSS/DH, RSA and DSS/ElGamal) and I can sign with
any that I choose by selecting the "save as" option. I am prompted for
which key to use. All my keys have the same userid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and
I select the key by their keyid. I've also got the default signing key
i
I encrypt with GPG it appears to give me a choice in which of my keys
to use, but it always uses the shortest key for encryption, regardless
of which one I chose. Any ideas?
Regards,
Dave
Hello!
On 2000-02-08 22:44:11 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote:
> My pgp_list_pubring_command is "gpg --no-verbose --batch --with-colons
> --list-keys %r".
> Mutt seems to have trouble with the output, it first wants me to
> select a key instead of using the 'pub' entry. Is my format wrong or
> is this
Mutt 1.1.3, GPG 1.0.1
My pgp_list_pubring_command is "gpg --no-verbose --batch --with-colons
--list-keys %r".
Mutt seems to have trouble with the output, it first wants me to
select a key instead of using the 'pub' entry. Is my format wrong or
is this a bug/feature?
Thanks,
A.
--
Adam Sherm
54 matches
Mail list logo
