On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
> On Tue 08.04.2014 19:53:02, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> > So, where am I supposed to read the manual?
>
> Maybe try the manual that came with your distribution (Debian:
> /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz) or at least the manual for the
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:19:58PM -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
> I don't even use Mutt, Patrick, or at least I don't use Mutt yet. I will
> use Mutt in the future if it supports the maildir architecture &
> protocol - to make that determination is the primary reason why I lurk
> here.
It does. :)
* Mark Filipak [04-09-14 15:21]:
> On 2014/4/9 2:39 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Mark Filipak [04-09-14 14:35]:
> >> On 2014/4/7 4:15 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >> -snip-
> >>> I can imagine that the problem is: a sender is always one person, while
> >>> the recipients could be many.
> >>
>
On 2014/4/9 2:39 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Mark Filipak [04-09-14 14:35]:
>> On 2014/4/7 4:15 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> -snip-
>>> I can imagine that the problem is: a sender is always one person, while
>>> the recipients could be many.
>>
>> Actually, a sender is not always one person. I
* Mark Filipak [04-09-14 14:35]:
> On 2014/4/7 4:15 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> -snip-
> > I can imagine that the problem is: a sender is always one person, while
> > the recipients could be many.
>
> Actually, a sender is not always one person. If you have multiple Google
> accounts, for example
On 2014/4/7 4:15 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
-snip-
> I can imagine that the problem is: a sender is always one person, while
> the recipients could be many.
Actually, a sender is not always one person. If you have multiple Google
accounts, for example, which you configure as SMTP & POP (or IMAP)
se
On 2014/4/9 11:55 AM, Derek Martin wrote:
-snip-
> I've said it many times, but I think that's perfectly reasonable,
> especially with something that has such a steep learning curve, as
> Mutt does. Asking a question about your specific problem is by far
> the fastest way to get the answer, if
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:31:52AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > Let's be fair... The manual changes from version to version
> > (especially major versions), and the link that Ulrich provided above
> > IS a perfectly valid link to the Mutt manual. It's just not the one
> > that's relevant to
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:14:22AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
>
> Let's be fair... The manual changes from version to version
> (especially major versions), and the link that Ulrich provided above
> IS a perfectly valid link to the Mutt manual. It's just not the one
> that's relevant to the versi
* Derek Martin [04-09-14 11:18]:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:20:38PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > I cannot find this text in
> > > http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.11
> > >
> > > So, where am I supposed to read the manual?
> >
> > Google does not work for you ???
> >
> >
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:20:38PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > I cannot find this text in
> > http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.11
> >
> > So, where am I supposed to read the manual?
>
> Google does not work for you ???
>
> You *are* expected to exhibit *some* small interest
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:53:02PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
> >
> > Actually the manual specifies this pretty nicely:
> >
> > == the fine manual, chapter 3.11:
> > Many users receive e-mail under a number of different addresse
On Tue 08.04.2014 19:53:02, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
> >
> > Actually the manual specifies this pretty nicely:
> >
> > == the fine manual, chapter 3.11:
> > Many users receive e-mail under a number of different addresses. To fully
>
* Ulrich Lauther [04-08-14 19:08]:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
> >
> > Actually the manual specifies this pretty nicely:
> >
> > == the fine manual, chapter 3.11:
> > Many users receive e-mail under a number of different addresses. To
> > fully use Mutt's
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
>
> Actually the manual specifies this pretty nicely:
>
> == the fine manual, chapter 3.11:
> Many users receive e-mail under a number of different addresses. To fully
> use
> Mutt's features here, the program must be able to rec
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:23:31PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
> > Actually the manual specifies this pretty nicely:
> >
> > == the fine manual, chapter 3.11:
> > Many users receive e-mail under a number of different addresses. To
* Ulrich Lauther [04-08-14 13:27]:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
> > Actually the manual specifies this pretty nicely:
> >
> > == the fine manual, chapter 3.11:
> > Many users receive e-mail under a number of different addresses. To fully
> > use
> > Mutt's
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
> Actually the manual specifies this pretty nicely:
>
> == the fine manual, chapter 3.11:
> Many users receive e-mail under a number of different addresses. To fully
> use
> Mutt's features here, the program must be able to recogn
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 05:43:15PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:14:44PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> > %-18.18F does not work for me: I still see my own name.
> > However, %-18.18t achieves what I want.
>
> Check out the alternates command; I believe that's why you're
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
>
> Actually the manual specifies this pretty nicely:
>
> == the fine manual, chapter 3.11:
> Many users receive e-mail under a number of different addresses. To fully
> use
> Mutt's features here, the program must be able to rec
On Tue 08.04.2014 11:09:26, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 08:48:04AM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> > * Ulrich Lauther on Tuesday, April 08, 2014 at 08:27:53 +0200
> > > The concept of "message is from you" is not clear to me.
> > > How does mutt decide whether a message is from
* Ulrich Lauther [04-08-14 05:11]:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 08:48:04AM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> > * Ulrich Lauther on Tuesday, April 08, 2014 at 08:27:53 +0200
> > > The concept of "message is from you" is not clear to me.
> > > How does mutt decide whether a message is from me or not?
> >
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 08:48:04AM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Ulrich Lauther on Tuesday, April 08, 2014 at 08:27:53 +0200
> > The concept of "message is from you" is not clear to me.
> > How does mutt decide whether a message is from me or not?
> > Does it look at the From: field, and if so,
* Ulrich Lauther on Tuesday, April 08, 2014 at 08:27:53 +0200
> The concept of "message is from you" is not clear to me.
> How does mutt decide whether a message is from me or not?
> Does it look at the From: field, and if so, what is it compared to?
> My login-name?
Read about the alternates comm
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:22:59PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:14:44PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > >
> > > I use:
> > > folder-hook =outbox 'set index_format="%?M?v& ? %4C %Z %{%b %d} %-18.18F
>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:14:44PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >
> > I use:
> > folder-hook =outbox 'set index_format="%?M?v& ? %4C %Z %{%b %d} %-18.18F
> > (%4c) %s"'
> >
> %-18.18F does not work for me: I still see my own
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:14:44PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> %-18.18F does not work for me: I still see my own name.
> However, %-18.18t achieves what I want.
Check out the alternates command; I believe that's why you're not
getting what you expect with %F.
--
Derek D. Martinhttp://www.
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> I use:
> folder-hook =outbox 'set index_format="%?M?v& ? %4C %Z %{%b %d} %-18.18F
> (%4c) %s"'
>
%-18.18F does not work for me: I still see my own name.
However, %-18.18t achieves what I want.
Though the manual says:
%F
El día Monday, April 07, 2014 a las 04:31:12PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan escribió:
> > I can imagine that the problem is: a sender is always one person, while
> > the recipients could be many.
> >
>
> The *problem* is the setting of index_format for the outbox folder, it is
> in the manual.
You h
* Matthias Apitz [04-07-14 16:18]:
> El día Monday, April 07, 2014 a las 09:12:23PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther escribió:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I save my outgoing messages in a file outbox,
> > using "set record=+outbox " in my .muttrc
> >
> > Now when I open this file (mutt -f outbox),
> > I see the
El día Monday, April 07, 2014 a las 09:12:23PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I save my outgoing messages in a file outbox,
> using "set record=+outbox " in my .muttrc
>
> Now when I open this file (mutt -f outbox),
> I see the subjects of the sent messages, that´s fine.
> I also
* Ulrich Lauther [04-07-14 15:13]:
> I save my outgoing messages in a file outbox,
> using "set record=+outbox " in my .muttrc
>
> Now when I open this file (mutt -f outbox),
> I see the subjects of the sent messages, that´s fine.
> I also see the sender, who is always myself - no surprise.
> It
Hi all,
I save my outgoing messages in a file outbox,
using "set record=+outbox " in my .muttrc
Now when I open this file (mutt -f outbox),
I see the subjects of the sent messages, that´s fine.
I also see the sender, who is always myself - no surprise.
It would be much more helpfull, to see the r
33 matches
Mail list logo
