Re: crash if regcomp failed

2017-08-06 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:11:44PM +0800, JiaZhouyang wrote: > I'm new to Mutt, I analyzed the source code and found a potential bug that > may cause crash. > > In mutt-1.8.3/pager.c:1737:4, if "regcomp” failed, "regexec" would cause a > crash since "Sea

crash if regcomp failed

2017-08-06 Thread JiaZhouyang
Hi, I'm new to Mutt, I analyzed the source code and found a potential bug that may cause crash. In mutt-1.8.3/pager.c:1737:4, if "regcomp” failed, "regexec" would cause a crash since "SearchRE" is null. I think it's unsafe to assume that the library func

Re: Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-26 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
It may be a patch in your version causing the problem. > > Yes, you're right. I tried out with not patched version and it doesn't > crash anymore. So it should be definitely something in *sidebar.patch*. > > In Debian 1.5.23 package (and also Ubuntu) there're th

Re: Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-26 Thread Filippo Panessa
oblem. Yes, you're right. I tried out with not patched version and it doesn't crash anymore. So it should be definitely something in *sidebar.patch*. In Debian 1.5.23 package (and also Ubuntu) there're those patches: - multiple-fcc.patch - sidebar-compose.patch - sidebar-dotpathsep.

Re: Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-26 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Filippo Panessa wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:31:27PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > Can you provide some more details about what you are doing that causes > > this? > > I wrote multi configuration for Gmail and UZH. You can switch between > them using and keys. Everything works co

Re: Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-26 Thread Bob Holtzman
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:09:55AM +0200, Filippo Panessa wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:29:29AM -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote: > > > Please excuse my ignorance but what is "unmailboxes"? > > The ``unmailboxes'' command is used to remove a token from the list of > folders which receive mail. Use

Re: Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-26 Thread Filippo Panessa
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:31:27PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Can you provide some more details about what you are doing that causes > this? I wrote multi configuration for Gmail and UZH. You can switch between them using and keys. Everything works correctly, but I cannot use *unmailboxe

Re: Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-25 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Filippo Panessa wrote: > I'm a new mutt user. I use Mutt 1.5.23 (2014-03-12) from Ubuntu 15.04 > (patched version). I wrote a double configuration and it should be > good if I could use unmailboxes when I switch between configuration, > but it makes crash mutt. > > I know t

Re: Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-25 Thread Filippo Panessa
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:29:29AM -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote: > Please excuse my ignorance but what is "unmailboxes"? The ``unmailboxes'' command is used to remove a token from the list of folders which receive mail. Use ``unmailboxes *'' to remove all tokens. I found this: http://dev.mutt.org/

Re: Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-25 Thread Bob Holtzman
figuration, > but it makes crash mutt. Please excuse my ignorance but what is "unmailboxes"? -- Bob Holtzman A fair fight is the result of poor planning.

Unmailboxes crash

2015-04-25 Thread Filippo Panessa
Hello, I'm a new mutt user. I use Mutt 1.5.23 (2014-03-12) from Ubuntu 15.04 (patched version). I wrote a double configuration and it should be good if I could use unmailboxes when I switch between configuration, but it makes crash mutt. I know that it's a knowed issue. Is there an

Re: mutt crash with large imaps and not show all mail

2012-01-10 Thread Alexander Gattin
Hello, On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:22:42PM +0100, debecio wrote: > After last update on debian testing mutt crash > with large imaps (2200 mails about) and often > not show all mails (I controlled this from > webmail). > I think this success much often with gmail. Have > anybody

mutt crash with large imaps and not show all mail

2012-01-09 Thread debecio
After last update on debian testing mutt crash with large imaps (2200 mails about) and often not show all mails (I controlled this from webmail). I think this success much often with gmail. Have anybody this? Tnx

Re: crash

2001-10-23 Thread Will Yardley
Thomas Roessler wrote: > There's no such thing as iconv/skeleton.c in mutt. I suppose you've > found a way to trigger a bug in the glibc on your system. Try > libiconv instead. hrmm that's the verbatim error i got w/r/t glibc it's libc-2.1.3 on debian linux with an old (2.2.14) kernel. it

Re: crash

2001-10-23 Thread Thomas Roessler
D]> >To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: crash >Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i >Organization: New Dream Network > >mutt crashed on me for the first time today; > >i got this error: >Copy

Re: crash

2001-10-23 Thread René Clerc
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [23-10-2001 20:06]: | mutt crashed on me for the first time today; First time today, or first time ever? ;) Unfortunately, I can't help you finding the cause... -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) For the theatre one needs long arms; i

crash

2001-10-23 Thread Will Yardley
t the top of the offending message: The following text is in the "utf-8" character set. ] [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ] [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ] did mutt crash because i don't have the proper something or othe

Re: IMAP Lost mailbox lock crash

2000-11-06 Thread Kai Blin
* Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/11/00, 15:35:03]: > > imap_check_mailbox() [* BYE Lost mailbox lock].Segmentation fault (core > > dumped) > > I don't have this one with 1.3.6i. > > > A similar bug affects the index. The same error message shows up but the > > program does not segfault. Inst

Re: IMAP Lost mailbox lock crash

2000-11-06 Thread Kai Blin
* Thomas Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/11/00, 00:37:50]: > Hi, I'm using Mutt 1.2.5i with IMAP. I am also using WMMail (a mail-checker > for WindowMaker) to access the same IMAP mailbox. If I am viewing a message, > then WMMail checks for new mail, then I press space bar to get to the next > page

Re: IMAP Lost mailbox lock crash

2000-11-06 Thread Kai Blin
* Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/11/00, 08:09:04]: > Could you please try 1.3.11 and see if it cures the problem? I'll have a look.. Kai -- Kai Blin Webmasterof http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/uni/thm/molgen/ Univ. of Tuebingen Inst. of Human Genetics fon +49-7071-2974890 Wilhe

Re: IMAP Lost mailbox lock crash

2000-11-06 Thread Brendan Cully
Could you please try 1.3.11 and see if it cures the problem? On Monday, 06 November 2000 at 00:37, Thomas Kim wrote: > Hi, I'm using Mutt 1.2.5i with IMAP. I am also using WMMail (a mail-checker > for WindowMaker) to access the same IMAP mailbox. If I am viewing a message, > then WMMail checks

IMAP Lost mailbox lock crash

2000-11-06 Thread Thomas Kim
Hi, I'm using Mutt 1.2.5i with IMAP. I am also using WMMail (a mail-checker for WindowMaker) to access the same IMAP mailbox. If I am viewing a message, then WMMail checks for new mail, then I press space bar to get to the next page of the message, Mutt crashes with the following error: imap_ch

IMAP Lost mailbox lock crash

2000-11-05 Thread Thomas Kim
Hi, I'm using Mutt 1.2.5i with IMAP. I am also using WMMail (a mail-checker for WindowMaker) to access the same IMAP mailbox. If I am viewing a message, then WMMail checks for new mail, then I press space bar to get to the next page of the message, Mutt crashes with the following error: imap_ch

FW: message makes mutt crash

1999-07-17 Thread J Horacio MG
I changed the subject line of this forwarded message, since it might be the cause of the followind problem: Subject: FW: Re: =??Q?Mutt_peta=2E=2E=2E_tambi=E9n_el_de_potato?= Some guys on the Debian Spanish list have posted that mutt crashes when they try to deal with this message. It happened

crash with 0.95.6i and rhl6.0

1999-06-29 Thread ptoscano
hello, i hope i'm not repeating something already covered. i've looked in the archives and at various docs and i can't find any mention of this, but it's been kind of a frantic search and i might have missed something i'm running red hat linux 6.0 on a 2.2.10 kernel. i compiled up mutt