On 20Feb2023 09:06, David Young wrote:
I sort my mailboxes with "sort=threads", "sort_aux=last-date-received".
I would like to apply scores to messages and sort threads first by
maximum message score, second by last-date-received. Is something like
that possible?
I'
On 20Feb2023 09:06, David Young wrote:
I sort my mailboxes with "sort=threads", "sort_aux=last-date-received".
I would like to apply scores to messages and sort threads first by
maximum message score, second by last-date-received. Is something like
that possible?
Well.. T
I sort my mailboxes with "sort=threads", "sort_aux=last-date-received".
I would like to apply scores to messages and sort threads first by
maximum message score, second by last-date-received. Is something like
that possible?
David
--
David Young
dyo...@pobox.comUrbana, IL(217) 721-9981
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:03:52PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> when displaying a mailbox index in threaded view, the different threads are
> sorted by the date of their oldest message. Is there a way to sort them by
> their newest message?
Yes, set $sort_aux to last-date
Hi,
when displaying a mailbox index in threaded view, the different threads
are sorted by the date of their oldest message. Is there a way to sort
them by their newest message?
Christopher
--
http://gmerlin.de
OpenPGP: http://gmerlin.de/christopher.pub
CB07 DA40 B0B6 571D 35E2 0DEF 87E2
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 04:26:27PM +, Globe wrote in
:
set sort_aux=last-reverse-date-received
Does that what you want? Without "last" it looks at the date of the first
message in the thread, with it, it uses the last one of all the messages.
Thanks! For me, and also from the manual, I
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 03:09:06PM +, Globe wrote in
:
Looking at: http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual.html#sort, it seems to me
that I should simply
set sort=threads
set sort_aux=reverse-date-received
However, what I get is the threads, correctly, but the ones with most recent
Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 23May2019 09:08, m...@raf.org wrote:
> > is it possible to get mutt to
> > reorder an mbox file by date ("od")
> > and then save it in that order?
> >
> > if not, i can use some other program
> > but i'd trust mu
On 23May2019 09:08, m...@raf.org wrote:
is it possible to get mutt to
reorder an mbox file by date ("od")
and then save it in that order?
if not, i can use some other program
but i'd trust mutt more.
I haven't tried it, but what if you sort on date and then save or cop
hi,
is it possible to get mutt to
reorder an mbox file by date ("od")
and then save it in that order?
if not, i can use some other program
but i'd trust mutt more.
cheers,
raf
order, find the
first in the thread, and switch to 't' order, it does the right thing.
I can sort of comprehend / guess how this might be happening; 't' collapses
threads, and because the current message is not directly visible
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Till Smejkal wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
Is it possible to apply multiple sort criteria at the message index? For
example, I generally want my messages threaded (Sort Thread)
but I would also secondarily like it sorted by Received (Sort Recv)
option
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
> Is it possible to apply multiple sort criteria at the message index? For
> example, I generally want my messages threaded (Sort Thread)
> but I would also secondarily like it sorted by Received (Sort Recv)
> option) so that more recent resp
Is it possible to apply multiple sort criteria at the message index? For
example, I generally want my messages threaded (Sort Thread)
but I would also secondarily like it sorted by Received (Sort Recv)
option) so that more recent responses in the thread pop the thread to the
most recent end of
Hi all,
It's bugged me forever that when I set sort_browser=unsorted, so that
my mailboxes are shown to me in the order I list them, Mutt also shows
me file listings in the file browser unsorted. I think this is
insane. Mailboxes list != file list; the two have different
properties and should be
On 2015-07-13, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2015-07-13 11:09 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>
>> Does 'set sort_aux=last-date-received' do what you want?
>
> Not quite, but
>
> set sort_aux=last-date
Brilliant!
That's been a minor annoyance for yonks. Every week or two I'd tell
myself "there's go
On 13Jul2015 20:05, mwnx wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:37:05AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
However, this one keeps getting on my frail nerves. There seems to be
no way in vanilla mutt to sort the index view such that the latest
message appears last, when threading is on. So when I open a
amazing, after all.
>
Ian, in case you are unaware, while in the index the "o"
command allows you to dynamically change the sort order.
My normal primary order is thread, but I'll sometimes
use the "o" command to change it to date in order to
group recent messages. T
On 2015-07-13 11:09 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Does 'set sort_aux=last-date-received' do what you want?
Not quite, but
set sort_aux=last-date
does. Thanks! mutt is amazing, after all.
--
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages.
Rule 420: All persons more than
ing on my frail nerves. There seems to be
> no way in vanilla mutt to sort the index view such that the latest
> message appears last, when threading is on. So when I open a folder
> with a long active thread, I keep landing in the middle of old inactive
> threads.
>
> A minimal
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> There seems to be no way in vanilla mutt to sort the index view such
> that the latest message appears last, when threading is on. So when I
> open a folder with a long active thread, I keep landing in the middle
> of old inactive threads.
Does 'set s
ing on my frail nerves. There seems to be
> no way in vanilla mutt to sort the index view such that the latest
> message appears last, when threading is on. So when I open a folder
> with a long active thread, I keep landing in the middle of old inactive
> threads.
Would
Since I switched to mutt full time a couple of months ago, there were
times when I missed one feature or another from other agents, but mostly
I learned to live with the mutt way.
However, this one keeps getting on my frail nerves. There seems to be
no way in vanilla mutt to sort the index view
* horseriver [2013-01-08 09:26:42 +0800]:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:14:54AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > * horseriver [2013-01-07 14:14:37 +0800]:
> >
> > > hi:
> > >
> > > I have subscribed several mail list ,and I want to sort mail by th
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:14:54AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> * horseriver [2013-01-07 14:14:37 +0800]:
>
> > hi:
> >
> > I have subscribed several mail list ,and I want to sort mail by their
> >
> > address into respective mail fold .
>
* horseriver [2013-01-07 14:14:37 +0800]:
> hi:
>
> I have subscribed several mail list ,and I want to sort mail by their
>
> address into respective mail fold .
>
> how can I do ?
>
> thanks!
Can you tell us more about how you access your mail, is it v
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:14:37PM +0800, horseriver wrote:
> hi:
>
> I have subscribed several mail list ,and I want to sort mail by their
>
> address into respective mail fold .
Since you appear to be using gmail, an article I wrote on my blog might
be of us
Quoting horseriver (horseriv...@gmail.com):
> I have subscribed several mail list ,and I want to sort mail by their
> address into respective mail fold .
> how can I do ?
This is not something mutt can do for you. Mutt is 'just a mail user
agent' (MUA), not a 'm
hi:
I have subscribed several mail list ,and I want to sort mail by their
address into respective mail fold .
how can I do ?
thanks!
rely
> > > > just changes the sort rules within a thread. At the moment mutt isn't
> > > > seeing/showing threads at all even though there are several messages
> > > > with the same subject.
>
> > > Am I being stupid or is this feature just
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:08:24PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:06:18PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > The problem is that threading isn't working at all, $sort_aux surely
> > > just changes the sort rules within a thread. At the moment mutt
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:06:18PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > The problem is that threading isn't working at all, $sort_aux surely
> > just changes the sort rules within a thread. At the moment mutt isn't
> > seeing/showing threads at all even though there are s
> > >
> > > folder-hook . 'set sort=threads;set hostname=""'
> > > folder-hook sentmail set sort=date-sent
> > >
> > > Up to now this has worked fine as most of the lists I belong to are well
> > > behaved and
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 01:24:47PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> [ Chris Green Wrote On Sat 1.Dec'12 at 11:35:23 GMT ]
>
> > I have the following in my muttrc file relating to thread sorting:-
> >
> > folder-hook . 'set sort=threads;set hostname=&q
[ Chris Green Wrote On Sat 1.Dec'12 at 11:35:23 GMT ]
> I have the following in my muttrc file relating to thread sorting:-
>
> folder-hook . 'set sort=threads;set hostname=""'
> folder-hook sentmail set sort=date-sent
>
> Up to now this has w
I have the following in my muttrc file relating to thread sorting:-
folder-hook . 'set sort=threads;set hostname=""'
folder-hook sentmail set sort=date-sent
Up to now this has worked fine as most of the lists I belong to are well
behaved and preserve the Mail-Id:.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:16:24PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> I tried my best to not give a clueless advice this
> time, so before suggesting to omit the user@ part
> from smtp_url I studied the mutt-1.5.20/smtp.c
> source:
> if (conn->account.flags & M_ACCT_USER)
> {
> if (!mutt_bi
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:08:10PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
> I'm sure I tried that--I didn't record
> everything I did, but that is something I
> _would_ try.
I tried my best to not give a clueless advice this
time, so before suggesting to omit the user@ part
from smtp_url I studied t
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:13:15AM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
[...]
> msmtp does SMTP well, and I use msmtp instead of
> smtp_url -- that's why my advices earlier in the
> thread missed the target. I have the last
> suggestion though: try to omit user@ part from
> smtp_url.
I'm sure I tried
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 05:23:36PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
> > 3.263. smtp_authenticators
> >
> >Type: string
> > [...]
>
> Yes. I found this. I tried various values,
> including the empty string, and nothing changed.
probably, mutt uses default authenticators list
when
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 07:45:32PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * jeremy bentham [06-23-12 19:36]:
> ...
> > Ok, I installed msmtp and after a bit of flailing about got it
> > working.
> >
> > Part of the flailing included an error message from
> > mail.eskimo.com that it didn't support aut
* jeremy bentham [06-23-12 19:36]:
...
> Ok, I installed msmtp and after a bit of flailing about got it
> working.
>
> Part of the flailing included an error message from
> mail.eskimo.com that it didn't support authentication.
> So I suppose it's puking when mutt insists.
>
> msmtp has a wa
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 06:37:54PM -0700, jeremy bentham wrote:
> On Jun 22 you wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:06:40PM -0700, jeremy
> > bentham wrote:
[stuff about inability to send mail from my own machine's mutt]
> > > instant "connection refused", with either smtp
> >
Cameron Simpson wrote, on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:34:23AM +1000:
> Maybe scoring can help here? I haven't yet dug into scores but I'd think
> it may be possible to assign a high score to personal email and a lower
> score to others, and then sort on score.
Yes, that&#x
On 07May2012 15:13, Jostein Gogstad wrote:
| Is it possible to sort a folder by message flags (the contents of $to_chars)?
|
| It would be great if I could start by reading mail addressed directly to me,
| and continue with mail addressed to me and others, CC'd to me and so on.
Maybe sc
Hi,
Is it possible to sort a folder by message flags (the contents of $to_chars)?
It would be great if I could start by reading mail addressed directly to me,
and continue with mail addressed to me and others, CC'd to me and so on.
--
Jostein
How to set sort and sort_aux to let mails sorted by score, then sort with
received-date, "reverse" or "last" can be added if it is needed.
--
[ *chris* ]
I try to detoxify my memory.
Forgotten is not a disappointment.
Give me a hug for my life.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 03:50:49PM +0800, chris M. sprite wrote:
> I tried many ways to let mutt sort with score, but it is not good, I mean
> that it sort with score but can not let new message in high place.
> for example: I want mutt to sort with *score* and *reverse-date-received
I tried many ways to let mutt sort with score, but it is not good, I mean that
it sort with score but can not let new message in high place.
for example: I want mutt to sort with *score* and *reverse-date-received*
I saw man muttrc, it said that if I want to use "sort_aux" I must
* Dennis Yurichev [2010-01-02 03:47 +0200]:
> Are there any possible option to sort messages in Trash folder by
> date/time of deletion?
> Sometimes, you already have few thousand messages in Trash, you delete
> some message and you can't find it in Trash. It is possible to so
On 02Jan2010 03:47, Dennis Yurichev wrote:
| Are there any possible option to sort messages in Trash folder by
| date/time of deletion?
| Sometimes, you already have few thousand messages in Trash, you delete
| some message and you can't find it in Trash. It is possible to sort it
| so t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Are there any possible option to sort messages in Trash folder by
date/time of deletion?
Sometimes, you already have few thousand messages in Trash, you delete
some message and you can't find it in Trash. It is possible to sort it
so t
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:31:11PM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> ++ 08/05/09 21:09 +0800 - Wu, Yue:
> >On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:40:00PM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> >> ++ 08/05/09 20:35 +0800 - Wu, Yue:
> >> >When I start mutt -y to read the mbox mails, mutt always
++ 08/05/09 20:35 +0800 - Wu, Yue:
>When I start mutt -y to read the mbox mails, mutt always sort them by
>alphabetic sequence, can I configure its sorting method to fit my preference?
I guess <http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#sort> is what you
are looking for?
--
When I start mutt -y to read the mbox mails, mutt always sort them by
alphabetic sequence, can I configure its sorting method to fit my preference?
--
Hi,
Wu, Yue
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:17:57PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> That hook, in essence, resets the sort order when you change folders.
> So if you temporarily change your sort to "reverse-date" and then open
> a new folder, the sort order will be set back to threads rat
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:36:36AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Once mutt parses the rc file you would have sort=threads. But if you
> changed to the spam folder it would be sort=spam as intended. Only how
> do you get it back now? You don't - you need the default hook. As it is
&
* On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 11:05PM -0500 Zhengquan Zhang
(zhang.zhengq...@gmail.com) muttered:
> folder-hook . set sort=threads
>
> set sort=threads
>
> Basically they do the same thing. Is there anything I am missing here?
Yes, they do the same thing - unless sort is changed by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 21 at 11:05 PM, quoth Zhengquan Zhang:
>This has puzzling me for quite a while,
>I saw in several muttrcs
>
>they use
>
>folder-hook . set sort=threads
>
>but I don't understand why they don't u
Dear mutt community:
This has puzzling me for quite a while,
I saw in several muttrcs
they use
folder-hook . set sort=threads
but I don't understand why they don't use
set sort=threads
instead.
Basically they do the same thing. Is there anything I am missing here?
Thanks a
Hi all,
Speaking of sorting, it it possible to sort threads and messages like that?
(A to J representing messages from the oldest to the last received)
A
|->D
|->E
|->J
|->G
B
|->C
|->F
|->I
|->H
(A,D,E,G,J) is the thread with the last received message, the
;s what I have in my muttrc file:
#v+
set sort=threads # Set the sort method in the index menu to threads.
set sort_aux=last-date-sent # List the most recent threads last.
#v-
It works for me.
Regards,
--
dave [ please don't CC me ]
Hi,
I really like the thread sorted view of mutt. But I would like a little change:
I would like the threads not to be sorted by the date of the first mail but by
the date if the most recent mail...
Is this possible?
Thanks!
Nathan
example) only have the meaning you want when in *index*
> mode, so let's change to that:
>
> macro index ,ot "Otset \
> sort_aux=last-date-received" \
> "Order by most recently active thread"
>
> Let's also stop using keybindings, and
quot;Otset \
sort_aux=last-date-received" \
"Order by most recently active thread"
Let's also stop using keybindings, and use function-calls exclusively
(because otherwise you never know when changing a keybinding might
kill some of your macros):
macro index ,ot &qu
On Fri, Aug/08/2008 03:37:18PM, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, August 8 at 04:07 PM, quoth Ethan Mallove:
> > Is there a way to have mutt sort by most recently active thread? It
> > appears that mutt dates an email thread by the timestamp of the
> > initiating t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, August 8 at 04:07 PM, quoth Ethan Mallove:
> Is there a way to have mutt sort by most recently active thread? It
> appears that mutt dates an email thread by the timestamp of the
> initiating thread email.
Yes!
set sort
Hello,
Is there a way to have mutt sort by most recently active
thread? It appears that mutt dates an email thread by the
timestamp of the initiating thread email. E.g., instead of
this:
...
0 N Thu, Aug/07/2008 08:31:30AM Mutt(5.3K) [Mutt] #3100:
forward_attribution missing
Does anyone know what the semantics of the inode sort configuration
option is?
Hello. I thought maybe someone on the list could be interested this.
Hope the publicity is ok. :) Quoting from the README file:
I've been always dissatisfied with the sort_browser=date option in Mutt,
particularly when dealing with maildirs. For me, the reasonable behavior
is to sort b
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 03:03:16PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
> =- Eur Ing Chris Green wrote on Fri 9.Feb'07 at 13:38:13 + -=
>
> > On one copy of mutt I'm using the default sort order seems to be
> > thread whereas on all the others it's date. Is it possible to
=- Eur Ing Chris Green wrote on Fri 9.Feb'07 at 13:38:13 + -=
> On one copy of mutt I'm using the default sort order seems to be
> thread whereas on all the others it's date. Is it possible to
> set the default sort order at build time (I did't build that
> on
On one copy of mutt I'm using the default sort order seems to be
thread whereas on all the others it's date. Is it possible to set the
default sort order at build time (I did't build that one)? Or is
there any other way it can be set apart from configuration in muttrc?
--
Chris Green
* Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-15 23:21]:
> I cannot get a display of my mailbox with threaed
> messages. what is the secret to this option?
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0;..
use mutt?!
Sven
--
frg fbeg=guernqf
Hi,
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-15 00:52:25 +0200] wrote:
[...]
> Yeah, I was afraid it wasn't possible right now.
Someone posted a patch to mutt-dev introducing a new modell
to handle sorting. Maybe...
> What is the formal method for submitting a feature
> request, along with some ideas o
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 02:15:10PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
| * Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 05:32:13 +0200] wrote:
| > On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 03:22:32AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
| > | set sort=threads
| > | set sort_aux=reverse-date-received
|
| > That doesn'
Hi,
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 05:32:13 +0200] wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 03:22:32AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
> | set sort=threads
> | set sort_aux=reverse-date-received
> That doesn't achieve the effect I want. Here is an example :
[...]
>
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 03:22:32AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
Thanks for your response.
| * Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 03:11:37 +0200] wrote:
|
| > What I would like to try is
| > 1) first group the messages according to the thread they are in
|
| set sort=threads
|
Hi,
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 03:11:37 +0200] wrote:
> I want to try a new sort order for my mailling list
> folders. I am currently using 'sort=threads,
> sort-aux=date-received'. I've tried adding 'reverse-' to
> the beginning of each
version: 1.4i
I want to try a new sort order for my mailling list folders. I am
currently using 'sort=threads, sort-aux=date-received'. I've tried
adding 'reverse-' to the beginning of each of those, but it isn't the
effect I want.
What I would like to try is
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:58:09PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
> * On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Jul 2002, Raoul Bönisch wrote:
> >
> > > The setting "set sort=subject" should have no effect because it is
> > > overwritte
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:15:38AM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jul 2002, Deb wrote:
>
> > But when I use mutt to read email, messages are not sorted by threads by
> > default. I have to go to options (o) and then sort by threads (t), which
> > then gives me
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-04 09:16:25 +0200]:
> Do you have any hooks which change $sort?
> What's the output of ":set ?sort\n"?
Ah, found it... I was sourcing a file that escaped me on the
first 2 go-throughs, and resetting sort to "da
* Deb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-03 22:37 -0700]:
> * Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-04 06:15:38 +0200]:
>
> > set sort=subject
> > set sort=threads# sorting the mails in threads
> > set sort_aux=date # sorting the threads
> >
> &
* Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-04 06:15:38 +0200]:
> set sort=subject
> set sort=threads # sorting the mails in threads
> set sort_aux=date # sorting the threads
>
> ... that works for me
Nope, didn't work. Must be something else.
Thanks anyw
On Wed, 03 Jul 2002, Deb wrote:
> But when I use mutt to read email, messages are not sorted by threads by
> default. I have to go to options (o) and then sort by threads (t), which
> then gives me the display that I want.
Hi,
try
set sort=subject
set sort=threads# sorting
I've been using mutt for about a week. In my .muttrc are these settings:
set sort=threads
set sort_aux=date-received
But when I use mutt to read email, messages are not sorted by threads by
default. I have to go to options (o) and then sort by threads (t), which
then gives me the di
* Romano B. Fonbuena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-24 15:35]:
> is it possible for mutt to have the ability
> of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers
> into different folders, sort of like a builtin
> procmail for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail?
(1) "
* On 2002.05.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Romano B. Fonbuena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it possible for mutt to have the ability
> of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers
> into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail
> fo
Hi,
* Romano B. Fonbuena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-05-24 17:26]:
>is it possible for mutt to have the ability
>of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers
>into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail
>for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail?
No, you s
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 02:21:16AM +0800, Romano B. Fonbuena wrote:
> sorry for bothering, but how about sending read mail
> onto specified folders instead of the default +mbox then?
> i'm still testing *-hooks and other settings which might
> do the trick without the need for fetchmail, anyway
>
Romano B. Fonbuena wrote:
> is it possible for mutt to have the ability
> of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers
> into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail
> for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail?
No, you want to use fetchmail+procmail to do this.
is it possible for mutt to have the ability
of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers
into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail
for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail?
--
Romano B. Fonbuena
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnupg: 0xDF5AE5B2
* Mike Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 06:45]:
> I have a few questions I was unable to find answers for in the docs/web:
> 1. How can I disable the 'L' flag in 1.3.28i? It's redundant for me
> since I already use procmail to sort my list-mail into folders.
Hello,
I coudln't find a way to modifiy the sort order in the IMAP folder
browser. Ideally I'd like to have the folders listed in
most-recently-modified order if at all possible.
TIA
--
HIPPOLYTE: Je venais en tremblant vous le dire à vous-même.
Hé quoi ! de votre erre
2:23PM -0800
Actually, yes ...
the original question was about _reversing_ the alphanumeric sort of a
text file on a line by line basis ...
rev ... 'reverses' each line, last char first, etc ... kinda silly, but
it really is part of bedian woody, among other distros. ... so
cat
Will Yardley wrote:
[... lots of stuff]
sorry misdirected email. d'oh.
w
--
Sintax error in config file! (line 378)
aborted!
GPG Public Key:
http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/
age thanks to apt. i generally prefer the bsd systems over either,
but use debian at work extensively. as far as day to day configuration
/ use, they're pretty much the same unless you're using some sort of
graphical configuration thingie which is probably not a great idea
anyway.
i
I'm playing around with sort= and sort_aux= trying to sort by
reverse-thread and then to sort within a thread by date. I've tried
various combinations to no avail so far. Usually within the thread the
messages also come out in reverse order of date. Any hints?
Regards,
Graham
ate? Limit doesn't seem to work for this.
Finally, How can I dynamically resort a mailbox. For example, mutt-users
is sorted by thread. Say I wanted to sort by date for a second or sort
by user while I look for something but the default should still be
thread. How can I do that?
I'm u
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
