It seems we were not on the same page. I was thinking of hosting a
mailing list. We as a group found someone with mailing list software and
he will host it. Thank you for your input.
--
MN Repair
In days of yore Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 10:07:55AM -0700,
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org quoth thu
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 04:09:20PM GMT, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> > https://neomutt.org/guide/configuration.html#lists
> It might not help. MN Repair earlier said this:
> > I do not have internet access. My email service is a 3rd party
> > private APN. So please exclude links in your answers.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 10:56:08AM -0700,
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 08:55:24AM GMT, MN Repair wrote:
Using Mutt 1.7.2. My manual stops at chapter 10. I need basic help
to get started once. Mind sharing chapter 14 ?
My manual stops at chapter 10 too. It
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 08:55:24AM GMT, MN Repair wrote:
> Using Mutt 1.7.2. My manual stops at chapter 10. I need basic help
> to get started once. Mind sharing chapter 14 ?
The header of your mail says:
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
which explains the difference, and strictly speaki
Using Mutt 1.7.2. My manual stops at chapter 10. I need basic help to
get started once. Mind sharing chapter 14 ?
--
MN Repair
In days of yore Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 01:15:20PM +0200, Rene Kita quoth thus:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 06:47:09AM -0400, MN Repair wrote:
> [...]
> > I am still baffled
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 06:47:09AM -0400, MN Repair wrote:
[...]
> I am still baffled on the mailing list setup
[...]
> In days of yore Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 07:51:34PM -0400, MN Repair quoth thus:
[...]
> > Also I am baffled on how to add a mailing list. Could someone give me a
> > good example ?
Hello
Can someone give me an example of using a different signature file
based on the send to address ? I have only 1 email address but would
prefer a different signature for a certain address I send to.
Also I am baffled on how to add a mailing list. Could someone give me a
good example ?
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:40:22PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
The winner appears to be Perl, namely the Mail::Audit module (and
whatever other modules it relies on). I had a couple of scripts that
did gentle transformations of incoming mails.
Congratulations on tracking this down.
This is a
very.loosely.org/itz-blog/
> Also, the most common variants of mbox are known to break
> cryptographic signatures, with the notorious ">From " escaping.
I stopped using mbox some years ago, and this could have been one of the
reasons (though the main reason was fragility when
meaning.
Also, the most common variants of mbox are known to break cryptographic
signatures, with the notorious ">From " escaping.
The winner appears to be Perl, namely the Mail::Audit module (and
whatever other modules it relies on). I had a couple of scripts that
did gentle transformations of incoming mails. The transformations were
supposed to only ever touch the headers, but I used a Mail::Audit object
to write back the
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 05:37:50PM -0500, Dave Dodge wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:21:49PM +0100, P. Mazart wrote:
> > Stas Verberkt schrieb am 17.11.2011 14:43:46:
> > > Nevertheless, disabling the "clear text" mode is not really an option,
> > > as this would render all my e-mails unreadabl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:21:49PM +0100, P. Mazart wrote:
> Stas Verberkt schrieb am 17.11.2011 14:43:46:
> > Nevertheless, disabling the "clear text" mode is not really an option,
> > as this would render all my e-mails unreadable by those using older
> > e-mailclients or e-mailclients on smartph
Hi,
Stas Verberkt schrieb am 17.11.2011 14:43:46:
> Nevertheless, disabling the "clear text" mode is not really an option,
> as this would render all my e-mails unreadable by those using older
> e-mailclients or e-mailclients on smartphones.
Actually we might not have an idea, what “clear text” m
tioning an incorrect multipart/signed structure.
Nevertheless, disabling the "clear text" mode is not really an option,
as this would render all my e-mails unreadable by those using older
e-mailclients or e-mailclients on smartphones.
Does anyone have an idea on how to get Mutt to accept th
Am 21.07.2011 05:43, schrieb XeCycle:
> After all it's deprecated. If mutt provides something like
> `message-hook', this could be done easily.
Despite being deprecated, there are some developers/users of other MUAs
still recommending it, e.g. thunderbird/enigmail.
Alex
--
»With the first link
Hei hei,
Am 21.07.2011 03:23, schrieb Dan McDaniel:
> Then I have to do ,p to make it verify the signature. I was hoping that there
> was a
> configuration variable that would make it do all that automatically like it
> does for
> detached signatures.
This works for me with th
Dan McDaniel writes:
> On Thu 21.Jul.11 11:43, XeCycle wrote:
>>Dan McDaniel writes:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>After all it's deprecated. If mutt provides something like
>
> Interestingly, all the alerts I get from us-cert.gov are sent with
> in-line signa
On Thu 21.Jul.11 11:43, XeCycle wrote:
Dan McDaniel writes:
[...]
After all it's deprecated. If mutt provides something like
Interestingly, all the alerts I get from us-cert.gov are sent with
in-line signatures. I think they are the only ones I receive that way.
Guess I'll wait
r
> detached signatures.
After all it's deprecated. If mutt provides something like
`message-hook', this could be done easily.
--
Carl Lei (XeCycle)
Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
OpenPGP public key: 7795E591
Fingerprint: 1FB6 7F1F D45D F681 C845 27F7 8D71 8EC4 7795
ng that there
was a
configuration variable that would make it do all that automatically like it
does for
detached signatures.
--
Dan McDaniel
Key fingerprint = 3B3E 782C 6488 3B80 CB77 5FBD 468F 9F42 3553 0D60
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dan McDaniel writes:
> I receive some mail which has the signature at the end of the body
> rather than in a separate part. Mutt doesn't seem to recognize these as
> being signed and doesn't verify them. If I save the message to a file
> and run 'gpg --verify' on it it verifies OK. Is there a way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I receive some mail which has the signature at the end of the body
rather than in a separate part. Mutt doesn't seem to recognize these as
being signed and doesn't verify them. If I save the message to a file
and run 'gpg --verify' on it it verifies
On [Thu, 24.02.2011 23:35], Andreas Kalex wrote:
Hi,
to filter not only signatures but long TOFU sequences too, I am using
t-prot, which is doing a good job. http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/
That's exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks a lot.
Cheers,
Thorsten
* Thorsten Scherf
t-prot is good.
This program is a filter which shall improve the readability for messages
(emails and posts) by *hiding* some annoying parts, including:
- mailing list footers
- excessive quoting
- overlong signatures
- Outlook-style "TOFU" (text above - full quote
Hi,
to filter not only signatures but long TOFU sequences too, I am using
t-prot, which is doing a good job. http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/
Andreas
* Thorsten Scherf wrote on 24.02.2011 at 21:25:
> Hey,
>
> some mailinglists using freemail providers put an automatic signature to
&g
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:12:51PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El dÃa Thursday, February 24, 2011 a las 08:01:26PM +0100, Thorsten Scherf
> escribió:
> > some mailinglists using freemail providers put an automatic signature to
> > all mails from the lists. How do I have to configure mutt to g
/
What are talking about "impossible?" There's no such thing.
What I'd do is add a filter onto getmail that just strips it out. But if
you aren't using getmail, then you'd have to do something else.
If all you care about is not seeing the signatures (but leaving them i
=- Thorsten Scherf wrote on Thu 24.Feb'11 at 20:01:26 +0100 -=
> some mailinglists using freemail providers put an automatic
> signature to all mails from the lists. How do I have to configure
> mutt to get rid of the signature from all mails within a specfic
> folder?
Check the raw folder-files,
El dÃa Thursday, February 24, 2011 a las 08:01:26PM +0100, Thorsten Scherf
escribió:
> Hey,
>
> some mailinglists using freemail providers put an automatic signature to
> all mails from the lists. How do I have to configure mutt to get rid of
> the signature from all mails within a specfic fol
Hey,
some mailinglists using freemail providers put an automatic signature to
all mails from the lists. How do I have to configure mutt to get rid of
the signature from all mails within a specfic folder?
Cheers,
Thorsten
Hi,
> The do it... :) In mutt, you can even set $signature to a pipe, i.e.
> a script that gets the signature as argument and prints it with BOM:
>
> set signature="script.sh signature|"
That's what I did now, wrote a script strip-bom.pl which removes the BOM
from the beginning of the signatur
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > As to where it comes from, the character is in the signature file. I
> > wouldn't expect the MUA to remove characters from the signature file.
>
> Not in general, but this one is special. ;-)
Not from mutt's view.
> > Why is it
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:11:58AM -0600, lee wrote:
> Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not
> seeing a special character in the signature.
Yes, it's just that this one has zero width and there mutt ignores
it (as it does for 0x200b).
Rocco
Hi,
> Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not
> seeing a special character in the signature.
Why should it not be? At least it corrupts the correct signature
coloring in my mutt. Haven't tried this with other mail clients yet.
> As to where it comes from, the characte
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 03:52:10PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
>
> 24 Alexander Dahl, Staff Engineer
>
> This is the same signature you should see below and you should also find
> this special character in it.
Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not
seeing a specia
Hi there,
up to today I had just one signature file in the plain old place
~/.signature which I edited on the system I used mutt. For my other mail
clients I have a bunch of different signature files in a VCS to use the
same files with different clients (actually several instances of Mozilla
Thund
Dear mutts,
At some point last year, I thought I spotted a bug in mutt and filed
it with Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/474506
Alain Bench replied, but I didn't see the reply until now. Anyway,
he said:
> > If I decode-save or decode-copy a mail [...] the attachment are
> > removed in the cop
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:31:48PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > > On 2007-10-09, Nicolas KOWALSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to not display the pgp or smime signature at all in
> > > > the pager ?
> This is what I actually use when reading the mutt lists.
>
> folder-hook
> > the pager ?
> > >
> > I set 'display_filter' to a script that cleans up a number of
> > message artifacts including such signatures. Here is part of it.
>
> Thanks for your code.
>
> Unfortunately it looks it does not help. :-(
>
> I
pt that cleans up a number of
> message artifacts including such signatures. Here is part of it.
Thanks for your code.
Unfortunately it looks it does not help. :-(
I have written a small shell script containing your code, and set
display_filter=/home/niko/bin/mutt-display-filter in .muttrc, but I
_filter' to a script that cleans up a number of
message artifacts including such signatures. Here is part of it.
- cut here -
sed -e '
/^\[-- Autoview using .* --]$/d
/^][0-9;]*\[-- Autoview using .* --]$/d
Hello,
Is it possible to not display the pgp or smime signature at all in the
pager ?
I have set crypt_verify_sig=no in my ~/.muttrc, but obviously this is
not sufficient.
Thanks,
--
Nicolas
On 07Apr2007 10:35, Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 the mental interface of Michael Pobega told:
| >I'm using Vim as my text editor and I've yet to figure out a good way
| >to automatically truncate everything below the signature line ()
| >when I reply to a
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 10:35:41 AM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >I'm using Vim as my text editor and I've yet to figure out a good
> >way to automatically truncate everything below the signature line
> >() when I reply to a message.
> >...
> Deletes everything from cur
e.
> > > >
> > > >I'd like to do this because I'd like to start using a signature in my
> > > >messages, and having to get rid of all of the signatures and automated
> > > >mailing list messages on every message manually is a bit ir
I've yet to figure out a good way
> > >to automatically truncate everything below the signature line ()
> > >when I reply to a message.
> > >
> > >I'd like to do this because I'd like to start using a signature in my
> > >messages, and having t
; >to automatically truncate everything below the signature line ()
> >when I reply to a message.
> >
> >I'd like to do this because I'd like to start using a signature in my
> >messages, and having to get rid of all of the signatures and automated
> >mailing li
ike to start using a signature in my
messages, and having to get rid of all of the signatures and automated
mailing list messages on every message manually is a bit irritating.
Deletes everything from cursor line position till the last --
():
map ,ds :.;/^-- $/dO-- dI
Elimar
--
On the keyboard of
in my
messages, and having to get rid of all of the signatures and automated
mailing list messages on every message manually is a bit irritating.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGFxZy/o7Q/FCvPe0RAhHcAKCOam3xqPjNQdOhh5hRrnZh0kEcTwCeJdyi
2uwRTtIzTvCgyXcgd5ZBAGs
ion. Besides, it's short.
>
> Laurabelle
> --
> ASCII silly question, get a silly ANSI.
this is a quote after sigdashes - but not a signature.
signatures contain at least a name and an address, too.
signatures contains a name *and* an address. at least.
quotes are just quotes and may b
If I send myself a signed message, Mutt says "PGP signature successfully
verified.", which is very nice.
But if I send a signed and encrypted message, it says "PGP signature could
NOT be verified.", which is not so good.
Anybody have an idea why?
This is happening on a system with Mutt 1.4i and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been reading so many docs/info/man's recently that I'm going
> cross-eyed. Perhaps that's the problem - read too much and you miss
> things! Information overload.
And my personal problem is, that I read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the thorough list of keyservers!
Check these too:
http://www.openpgp.net/pgpsrv.html >
http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/keyserver.html >
There's pretty thorough lists of keyservers
Hi,
* David T-G [02-06-10 15:10:02 +0200] wrote:
> Sure thing. I got tired of hitting dead or empty
> keyservers and so I started taking notes every time I saw
> one mentioned. I also run
> host -l pgp.net | grep wwwkeys | sed "s/^/#/" | sort
If you like, go with the template options file t
Kevin --
We're starting to move dangerously near the edge of topic...
...and then Kevin Coyner said...
%
% On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:09:18AM -0500, David T-G wrote..
% >
% > %
% > % I'm using the new 1.0.7,
% >
% > OK. If you've never used gpg before this then you're probably fine; if
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:09:18AM -0500, David T-G wrote..
> Kevin, et al --
>
> %
> % I'm using the new 1.0.7,
>
> OK. If you've never used gpg before this then you're probably fine; if
> you're upgrading, there are some particular caveats.
>
New user. Can't you tell? I thought it w
Aaron --
...and then Aaron Goldblatt said...
%
% > keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
%
% When I add this (1.0.7), I get:
%
% [-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon 10 Jun 2002 02:17:15 AM CDT)
% --]
% gpg: /home/rnbwpnt/.gnupg/options:108: invalid optionncrypted bodies,
% [-- End of P
Kevin, et al --
...and then Kevin Coyner said...
%
% On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:26:26PM -0500, David T-G wrote..
% >
% > ...and then Kevin Coyner said...
% > %
...
% > % My gut feel is the the line I have in the 'options' file for keyserver
% > % is what the problem is.
% >
% > Are you
> keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
When I add this (1.0.7), I get:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon 10 Jun 2002 02:17:15 AM CDT)
--]
gpg: /home/rnbwpnt/.gnupg/options:108: invalid optionncrypted bodies,
[-- End of PGP output --]
ag
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:26:26PM -0500, David T-G wrote..
> Kevin --
>
> ...and then Kevin Coyner said...
> %
> % I've recently installed mutt and loving it. Now I'm taking a stab at
> % getting my GnuPG key associated with mutt, verifying sigs, etc.
>
> Good deal!
>
>
> %
> % I've
Kevin --
...and then Kevin Coyner said...
%
% I've recently installed mutt and loving it. Now I'm taking a stab at
% getting my GnuPG key associated with mutt, verifying sigs, etc.
Good deal!
%
% I've got it working such that I can send my signature and send
% encrypted, but for some reason
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:00:44PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> And in my ~/.gnupg/options I have:
>
> keyserver search.keyserver.net
>
> My gut feel is the the line I have in the 'options' file for keyserver
> is what the problem is.
Try a different keyserver. I think this one is down (for
Hi,
* Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-09 23:00]:
>I've recently installed mutt and loving it. Now I'm taking a stab at
>getting my GnuPG key associated with mutt, verifying sigs, etc.
>
>I've got it working such that I can send my signature and send
>encrypted, but for some reason I can'
I've recently installed mutt and loving it. Now I'm taking a stab at
getting my GnuPG key associated with mutt, verifying sigs, etc.
I've got it working such that I can send my signature and send
encrypted, but for some reason I can't verify the sigs of others.
Here's what I have in my .muttrc
* Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-03 11:02]:
> I'ld like to know how I can have different
> signatures depending on the recipient.
> I'd like to have a default signature which is always
> used except for specific recipient addresses
> (mailing lists)
Michael Herman wrote:
> > Can someone point me into the right direction how I can
> > accomplish this task?
> send-hook. Check out www.mutt.org and RTFM on this topic.
And patterns (hint: ~l and ~A).
--
Cedric
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:06:59 +0200
Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'ld like to know how I can have different signatures
> depending on the recipient.
>
> Therefore I'ld like to have a default signature which is
> alwa
Hi,
I'ld like to know how I can have different signatures
depending on the recipient.
Therefore I'ld like to have a default signature which is
always used except for specific recipient addresses (mailing
lists) for which I'ld like to have a diff
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-24-11 20:17 +0100]:
> Just another quetion:
> Is there a possibility to tell mutt to coose the signature randomly
> out of a directory?
I'll once again plug my approach, which is to use fortune for the
random part of my sig. I don't generally like
re file (that means a file where all
signatures are listed, seperated by empty lines), you can define a
prefix (some lines that are inserted before the signature), you can
insert new signatures via command line (no need to edit the sig archive
by hand). It generates the ~/.signature for you.
I'
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 11:58:04PM -0500, Harold Bibik wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 08:17:43PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter arranged the electrons
>something like this:
>
>
> > Just another quetion:
> > Is there a possibility to tell mutt to coose the signature randomly
> > out of a directory?
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 08:17:43PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter arranged the electrons
something like this:
> Just another quetion:
> Is there a possibility to tell mutt to coose the signature randomly
> out of a directory?
I use a sig generator called makesig, a perl script that will choose a
r
> %
> % send-hook "." "set signature='echo -n "Uptime: "; uptime \
> % | sed "s/.*up\(.*\),\ \+[0-9]\+\ user.*/\1/"|'"
>
> That is one way to do it, and a fine way at that. You could lose the
> quotes around the . regexp, though, and you may have some troubles with
> the nested quotes arou
Igor --
...and then Igor Pruchanskiy said...
% Hello all,
Hello!
%
% I have a little question here
% See this signature at the bottom? Well, it is not supposed to be here.
That happens.
%
% I have these set in my .muttrc
%
% # Makes signature look like this : "Uptime: 20 days, 22:01
Hello all,
I have a little question here
See this signature at the bottom? Well, it is not supposed to be here.
I have these set in my .muttrc
# Makes signature look like this : "Uptime: 20 days, 22:01"
# Stolen from mutt-users list :)
set signature='echo -n "Uptime: "; uptime \
|
Thus spake Viktor Rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> However, my sister -- who has to use Outlook as her e-mail client --
> pointed out to me, that gpg-signed mails won't show up properly in
> Outlook. Instead, there are too attachments, the plain-text message
> and the signature. So she ends up
Hello folks,
I started with mutt a week ago and I am more than happy with it.
However, my sister -- who has to use Outlook as her e-mail client --
pointed out to me, that gpg-signed mails won't show up properly in
Outlook. Instead, there are too attachments, the plain-text message and
the signa
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:25:18PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> > Various hooks are handled differently; send-hooks, IIRC, stop at the
> > first match. Are you sure you've tried
> >
> > default
> > duivel
> > nl
> >
> > in that order (sorry, but...)? Nothing else looks out of the ord
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:44:38PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% > ...
% > %
% > % This does not work, whatever order I put them in.
% > % It still sends the .signature.nl
% >
% > Various hooks are handled d
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:44:38PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Cliff --
>
> ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
> % Hello
> % I am using send-hooks for different signatures.
> ...
> %
> % This does not work, whatever order I put them in.
> % It still sends the .signatur
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% Hello
% I am using send-hooks for different signatures.
...
%
% This does not work, whatever order I put them in.
% It still sends the .signature.nl
Various hooks are handled differently; send-hooks, IIRC, stop at the
first match. Are you sure
Hello
I am using send-hooks for different signatures.
For example
# Default signature
#
send-hook . 'set signature="~/.signature"'
# Dutch signature
#
send-hook ".*\.nl" 'set signature="~/.signature.nl"'
The second one signs my mail with a dutch
[31.08.01 08:02 +0700] Efata <-- :
> I have try this script but I always get error in end file line 45:syntax
> error : unexpected end of file.
In these cases generally look for
- missing closing signs of all kinds (like echo "this)
- missing space signs (like func() {action})
- spaces after the
I have try this script but I always get error in end file line 45:syntax
error : unexpected end of file.
Thanks.
On Tue 27/08/2001 at 04:10PM -0400, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
> A while back, someone asked how to strip out signatures, etc. I posted a
> little script which I&#x
A while back, someone asked how to strip out signatures, etc. I posted a
little script which I've since improved. The included awk script can be
easily modified to include different types of signatures (advertisements,
etc.).
Here's the script in cace anyone's interested. Just cha
Adam Sherman wrote:
: The attached message is one that I pulled raw out of my Sent folder,
: it hasn't gone through any mail systems.
:
: Yet I can't verify it.
:
: Any thoughts?
Do you can send your system-wide muttrc (usually ${prefix}/etc/muttrc
where ${prefix} is defined in configure time),
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 10:09:03AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Adam Sherman proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > I still can't solve this problem. Do note however, that only
> > clearsigned messages have this problem. When encrypting and signing my
> > signature is properly verified.
Adam Sherman proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I still can't solve this problem. Do note however, that only
> clearsigned messages have this problem. When encrypting and signing my
> signature is properly verified.
Are you running Courier MTA on your box by any chance?
-s
--
Suresh
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:54:39AM -0400, Adam Sherman wrote:
> The attached message is one that I pulled raw out of my Sent folder,
> it hasn't gone through any mail systems.
>
> Yet I can't verify it.
I still can't solve this problem. Do note however, that only
clearsigned messages have this p
The attached message is one that I pulled raw out of my Sent folder,
it hasn't gone through any mail systems.
Yet I can't verify it.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
A.
P.S. My key is attached as well.
--
Adam Sherman
President & Technology Architect
Tritus CGI
+1 (613) 255-5164
Signed Message
PGP
Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 16 Nov 2000:
> Example:
>
> send-hook ~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]set signature=~/.sig-mutt
> send-hook ~Aset signature=~/.sig-default
That example is a bit misleading, as the ~A match would be better if
placed bef
I use "set reverse_name" to change my "from" header.
I'd like to be able to change my signature depending on what my "from"
header is. Is there a way to this?
If not, is there a way to get the same effect as "set reverse_name" while
still being able to tie the signature to what address I'm using
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 08:34:01AM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote:
> I use "set reverse_name" to change my "from" header.
>
> I'd like to be able to change my signature depending on what my "from"
> header is. Is there a way to this?
$reverse_name is handled _before_ send-hook, so you can match on y
I use "set reverse_name" to change my "from" header.
I'd like to be able to change my signature depending on what my "from"
header is. Is there a way to this?
If not, is there a way to get the same effect as "set reverse_name" while
still being able to tie the signature to what address I'm using
Darrin --
...and then Darrin Mison said...
%
[LookOut! problem description snipped]
%
% know a way to correct this apart from surgically removing outlook ;-)
Well, that's definitely the right way, but you might look into
pgp_create_traditional to do in-line signatures. There was al
People are complaining to me that my pgp signatures show up as unidentified attachments
which freaks them out (MS users). Is there a way to force the signature to identify
itself
as being what it is?
I also know a few outlook users which say that my signed messages turn up as a blank
message
signature, the pgp
> signature verification succeeds. More interestingly, if the space after the
> double-dash is removed, the signature verification ALSO SUCCEEDS. Now I
> know that the convention for signatures is '-- \n', but that space somehow
> seems to be breaking gpg
signature verification ALSO SUCCEEDS. Now I
know that the convention for signatures is '-- \n', but that space somehow
seems to be breaking gpg's ability to verify PGP signatures. Anyone have
any idea why this might be so?
--
Anand
Subba --
...and then Subba Rao said...
% On 0, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > Using a large mallet, Subba Rao whacked out:
% >
% > > I would like to be able to send messages to some people with customized
% > > signatures and for some I want a tri
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
