Re: Mixmaster

2009-07-02 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * sigi wrote: > I'm using mixmaster 3.0.0-2 with mutt 1.5.18-6+b1 on debian lenny and it > all works just fine. So the manual seems to be very outdated Updated now, thanks. Rocco pgpJfQ9J5Fo79.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Mixmaster

2009-06-28 Thread sigi
Hi, On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 05:17:10PM +1000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > Just a small followup to my own post. I found the mixmaster changelog > and it appears that mutt support was added to the version 3 beta 25. > i.e. not long after the manual article reference was correct. The change > made w

Re: Mixmaster

2009-06-28 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 01:45:24PM +1000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > I did quite a bit of work with mixmaster years ago and I think some of > the information in the manual was from me. I am no longer interested in > using mixmaster but I sort of keep an eye on it. Recently I have > returned to usin

Re: Mixmaster

2007-12-09 Thread Francesco Ciattaglia
* Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.12.07 17:30]: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:51:44PM +0100, Francesco Ciattaglia wrote: > > * Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06.12.07 21:31]: > > > Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I > > > was involved in improving

Re: Mixmaster

2007-12-06 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:51:44PM +0100, Francesco Ciattaglia wrote: > * Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06.12.07 21:31]: > > Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I > > was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curious. I have > > no intention

Re: Mixmaster

2007-12-06 Thread Francesco Ciattaglia
* Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06.12.07 21:31]: > Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I > was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curious. I have > no intention of ever using it again. The support is for a very old > version of Mixmaster a

Re: mixmaster

2000-11-10 Thread Erwin Kaiser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons to read: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote: > > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate > > this feature. How does it work? > > TIA Erwin > > Did

Re: mixmaster

2000-11-10 Thread Erwin Kaiser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons to read: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote: > > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate > > this feature. How does it work? > > TIA Erwin > > Did

Re: mixmaster

2000-11-10 Thread Erwin Kaiser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons to read: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote: > > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate > > this feature. How does it work? > > TIA Erwin > > Did

Re: mixmaster

2000-11-09 Thread Erwin Kaiser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons to read: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote: > > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate > > this feature. How does it work? > > TIA Erwin > > Did

Re: mixmaster

2000-11-08 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote: > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate > this feature. How does it work? > TIA Erwin Did you compile with mixmaster enabled? Look at "mutt -v" to see whether you did. If not look at "./configure -

Re: Mixmaster support in mutt

2000-09-23 Thread Russell Hoover
On Wed 09/20/00 at 08:40 PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My efforts in this direction however lead me to the following > reflections. The L-mix e-mail list has virtually no traffic. The various > newsgroups that could possibly have people interested in this topic have > l

Re: mixmaster support in mutt

2000-08-22 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-08-21 13:21:25 -0700, rex wrote: >> However I understand that version 2.9beta23 which I tried first >> does not support the "-T" flag. I then tried version 2.0 and >> this also appears to not support the "-T" flag. So, what >> versions of mixmaster does mutt support? > Good question. Unf

Re: mixmaster support in mutt

2000-08-21 Thread rex
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 02:08:53PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > However I understand that version 2.9beta23 which I tried first does not > support the "-T" flag. I then tried version 2.0 and this also appears to > not support the "-T" flag. So, what versions of mixmaster does mutt > suppor