Gary, et al --
...and then Gary Johnson said...
%
% On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:22:34PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% > ...and then Gary Johnson said...
%
% > % On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > %
% > % > Please help me clarify... Is it the case that $mime_forward d
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:22:34PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Gary Johnson said...
> % On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % > Please help me clarify... Is it the case that $mime_forward does not
> % > work at all for you, or simply that you do not want
Aleks --
...and then Aleks Owczarek said...
%
% On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:24:47PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > Sure; that's fair, and you're entitled to your HO. So write it :-)
%
% well I suppose the point of my question was to inspire someone with
% the know-how to do just that ... and you s
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:24:47PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Sure; that's fair, and you're entitled to your HO. So write it :-)
well I suppose the point of my question was to inspire someone with
the know-how to do just that ... and you sound like such a clever
fellow David ...
anyway, thanks f
Aleks --
...and then Aleks Owczarek said...
%
% On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > Please help me clarify... Is it the case that $mime_forward does not
...
%
% Read Gary Johnson's explanation for clarification.
Actually, all I needed was a simple "the former"
Gary, et al --
...and then Gary Johnson said...
%
% On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% > Please help me clarify... Is it the case that $mime_forward does not
% > work at all for you, or simply that you do not want to forward the
% > message, with its attachments, in
David-
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
>
> Please help me clarify... Is it the case that $mime_forward does not
> work at all for you, or simply that you do not want to forward the
> message, with its attachments, in its own single attachment container?
> If it's the
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:01:00AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
>
> > % > Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
> > % >
> > % > > convoluted process easier by adding a "forward-with-attachments"
> > % > > variable
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % > Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
> % >
> % > > convoluted process easier by adding a "forward-with-attachments"
> % > > variable or am i missing something?
> Please help me clarify... Is it th
Aleks --
...and then Aleks Owczarek said...
%
% On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:07:40PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
% > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% > Hash: SHA1
% >
% > Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
% >
% > > convoluted process easier by adding a "forward
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:07:40PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
>
> > Now, if any mutt developers are reading this. Please make this
> > convoluted process easier by adding a "fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
> Now, if any mutt developers are reading this. Please make this
> convoluted process easier by adding a "forward-with-attachments" variable
>
> or am i missing something?
I beli
12 matches
Mail list logo
