Gary, et al -- ...and then Gary Johnson said... % % On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % % > Please help me clarify... Is it the case that $mime_forward does not % > work at all for you, or simply that you do not want to forward the % > message, with its attachments, in its own single attachment container? % % OK, let me try to explain this by an example. Someone sends me a
I just wanted to make sure I understood the problem; lots of people started pointing to $mime_forward when I didn't think that that was the answer Aleks sought. ... % twice to select both parts of the message, then type ';f' to forward % both parts. After answering "n" to "Forward MIME encapsulated? % ([n]/y):", mutt starts my editor with the text/plain part already there. So you (or you in Aleks's shoes) want to be able to edit the text body as though it were a reply. OK. % Great! I finish editing and find that mutt has included the attachment Right; this part I get. % in the message. Again great! This is exactly the behavior I want. But % I want it as easily as I get the other forwarding behaviors, in one % keystroke, maybe two. So $mime_forward and putting any prologue in your envelope isn't good enough. Hey, if you want it, then that's fine. It seems useless to me but that's why we have a configurable MUA :-) I repeat that it's time for a feature patch, so one of you guys either start coding one or find someone who will. HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg24466/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
