Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-14 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2001-05-13 19:59:00 -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote: >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, May 11, 2001 at >08:25:07PM +0200S You could of course delete In-Reply-To, which would at the same time take care of References. -- Thomas Roesslerhttp

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out: > I agree,... but what about messages which are NOT replies? I > think that's what the original question was about. If he invokes > the function, (bound to "m" by default), he must then > specify a "To:" header address. I think that's what he was >

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Mr. Wade
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out: > > > I do this as well. I think that perhaps I misunderstood the > > original question. I was under the impression that the asker > > wanted to know how to have a default "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > header specified wh

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out: > I do this as well. I think that perhaps I misunderstood the > original question. I was under the impression that the asker > wanted to know how to have a default "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > header specified when he loaded his mailing list mailbox fold

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Mr. Wade
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out: > > > This was an attempt to have Mutt use a default "To:" address for > > a mailbox folder, as I understand it. > > Yes. And I use procmail with other headers (say Sender: - usually distinctive > to the list) to fil

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, I know you quoted manual... But context made me worry. I am not sure we are talking same thing but try explaining what I meant: On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:13:28PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote: > > > > I am searching for

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out: > This was an attempt to have Mutt use a default "To:" address for > a mailbox folder, as I understand it. Yes. And I use procmail with other headers (say Sender: - usually distinctive to the list) to filter each list into a separate mbox -- Sure

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Wilhelm Wienemann
Hello Osamu! On Sat, 12 May 2001, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote: > > > I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending > > > on > > list-reply (default: L) > > > Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extra

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Mr. Wade
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out: > > > > folder-hook .'unmy_hdr To:' > > > folder-hook =IN-L-mutt-users 'my_hdr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > A problem with this, though, is that list-replies tend to have > > > the list address twice i

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-13 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote: > > I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on > list-reply (default: L) > Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any addresses > which match the addresses given by the ``lists

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-11 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out: > > folder-hook .'unmy_hdr To:' > > folder-hook =IN-L-mutt-users 'my_hdr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > A problem with this, though, is that list-replies tend to have > > the list address twice in the To: field. I haven't spent any > > ti

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-11 Thread Wilhelm Wienemann
Hello Kai! On Fri, 11 May 2001, Kai Weber wrote: > I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on > the actual folder. Let's say I am in the mutt's Mailinglist folder. If > I press "m" I want a default address [EMAIL PROTECTED] there. > > I think it is an folder-hook thing

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-11 Thread Mr. Wade
Kai Weber wrote: > I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on the > actual folder. Let's say I am in the mutt's Mailinglist folder. If I > press "m" I want a default address [EMAIL PROTECTED] there. > > I think it is an folder-hook thing, but I have no idea how to implem

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-11 Thread Gary Johnson
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:12:34PM +0200, Kai Weber wrote: > I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on the > actual folder. Let's say I am in the mutt's Mailinglist folder. If I > press "m" I want a default address [EMAIL PROTECTED] there. > > I think it is an folder-h

Re: Folder specific TO-Address

2001-05-11 Thread Mr. Wade
Kai Weber wrote: > I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on the > actual folder. Let's say I am in the mutt's Mailinglist folder. If I > press "m" I want a default address [EMAIL PROTECTED] there. > > I think it is an folder-hook thing, but I have no idea how to implem