Hi, I know you quoted manual... But context made me worry. I am not
sure we are talking same thing but try explaining what I meant:
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:13:28PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
> > > > I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending
> > > > on
...
> > > list-reply (default: L)
> > ....
> > > Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any
> > > addresses which match the addresses given by the ``lists or
> > > subscribe'' commands, but also honor any Mail-Followup-To
> > > header(s) if the ``$honor_followup_to'' configuration variable is
> > > set. Using this when replying to messages posted to mailing lists
> > > helps avoid duplicate copies being sent to the author of the
> > > message you are replying to.
> >
> > Is this true solution?
>
> Sorry, but I didn't say it's the 'one-and-only' solution.
> For me it's one of more possible ways to do it which will work
> here on my box without any problems. :-)
When "L" is pressed in place of "m", it creates To: correctly as
described above but also sets additional one:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200S
So it becomes part of other thread if used in place of "m" command. ;-)
"m" will not set above tag.
Original posting was about how-to-set To:... for "m", I think...
Regards,
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~
+ Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D +
+ My debian quick-reference, http://www.aokiconsulting.com/quick/ +
