I don't know what the debian package is, but the manual on www.mutt.org
is for the "stable" version -- that is, 1.4.2.3. You may be interested
in the 1.5.21 manual at http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#wrap .
* On 10 Feb 2012, Paul E Condon wrote:
> In section 6.3 Configuration variables, I can
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:02:18PM -0400, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:49:28PM -0700 or thereabouts, Jack Bates wrote:
> > How can I force mutt to update my IMAP server - changing, for instance,
> > the "new" flag - immediately, instead of waiting until I quit? Thanks,
>
> $,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:49:28PM -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
> How can I force mutt to update my IMAP server - changing, for instance,
> the "new" flag - immediately, instead of waiting until I quit? Thanks,
Try doing a mailbox sync with the '$' key.
burton
msg31438/pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:49:28PM -0700 or thereabouts, Jack Bates wrote:
> How can I force mutt to update my IMAP server - changing, for instance,
> the "new" flag - immediately, instead of waiting until I quit? Thanks,
$, by default, resyncs your IMAP mailbox.
--kurt
02-Apr-02 at 17:16, Adam Shostack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> The client's clock is running a few minutes behind the server. You
> write the file at local noon, which the server sets to be 12:03. Mutt
> checks the file, sees that its mtime is in the future (12:03 being
> later than 12:00), and
Sadiq Al-Lawatia wrote:
> The home directories are indeed nfs mounted. And after a little chat
> with the system administrator, it turns out the problem is exactly as
> Adam has suggested in his reply about the clocks not running at the
> same time.
>
> So I guess there is nothing I can do, unl
Quoting Kyle Rawlins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I notice that the tmp directory is somewhere under the home directory so could
> possibly be nfs mounted - if there is a time skew between the server and the
> computer running mutt this could potentially cause problems too. I am having a
> hard time ex
Adam Shostack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The client's clock is running a few minutes behind the server. You
> write the file at local noon, which the server sets to be 12:03. Mutt
> checks the file, sees that its mtime is in the future (12:03 being
> later than 12:00), and warns you.
I gues
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:02:02PM -0500, Kyle Rawlins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:04:24PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > Sadiq Al-Lawatia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > "~/Mail/tmp/mutt-csce-4803-30 [#1] modified. Update encoding?
> > > ([yes]/no): "
> >
> > So, the mystery her
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:04:24PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Sadiq Al-Lawatia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > "~/Mail/tmp/mutt-csce-4803-30 [#1] modified. Update encoding?
> > ([yes]/no): "
>
> So, the mystery here is, why does Mutt think that you're changing the
> file behind his back?
Sadiq Al-Lawatia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "~/Mail/tmp/mutt-csce-4803-30 [#1] modified. Update encoding?
> ([yes]/no): "
This message indicates that the time-stamp on the file has been changed
since Mutt last saw you write to the file.
That is, when Mutt launches your editor, and your edito
x27;m afraid I don't have an answer for your question, but I do have
a suggestion for your admin: go back and re-update to 1.3.28 (latest
development release and a 1.4 release candidate), since a security hole
was fixed with 1.3.27.
HTH & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G *
On 30-Jan-2002 23:06 Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
|
| Note however, that the usual caveats of clear-signing still apply, if
| there is a broken MTA setup somewhere along the way, you might get a
| broken signature. Not if Outlook would notice of course. :)
I just wanted to add that if you are u
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:56:23PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> I'm interested in such thing. Where can i get this?
Try: http://grepmail.sourceforge.net/
There's a link on that page to the mutt front-end too.
- Paul
--
Paul Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Cliff,
hi mutt users,
Cliff mentioned a frontend to grepmail:
* Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Fre., 23. Nov. 2001; 17:36:09 +0100]:
[...]
> But I see no mention of grepmail, and it's little mutt front-end
> friend.
I'm interested in such thing. Where can i get this?
Ciao, gregor
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:34:19PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 René <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> > * Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20-11-2001 15:36]:
> >
> > | Hi,
> > |
> > | Finally got around to updating it :
> > |
> > | h
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 René <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> * Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20-11-2001 15:36]:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | Finally got around to updating it :
> |
> | http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/mutt.html
> |
> | Feedback ?
>
> Looks nice! You could c
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 11:04:52AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> For the record, w3m also supports frames, manually via the F command or
> automatically via the -F command-line option. (I don't know why it
> doesn't render them by default.)
It does, if you set that option on the option screen and
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:16:48PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Ren? Clerc wrote:
> >
> > > Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser "links".
> > > IMO, this is the best alternative for lynx. It supports frames!
Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Ren? Clerc wrote:
>
> > Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser "links".
> > IMO, this is the best alternative for lynx. It supports frames!
>
> For the record, w3m also supports frames, manually via the F comma
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Ren? Clerc wrote:
> Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser "links".
> IMO, this is the best alternative for lynx. It supports frames!
For the record, w3m also supports frames, manually via the F command or
automatically via the -F c
* Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20-11-2001 16:17]:
| On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, René Clerc wrote:
|
| > * Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20-11-2001 15:36]:
| >
| > | Hi,
| > |
| > | Finally got around to updating it :
| > |
| > | http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/mutt.html
| > |
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, René Clerc wrote:
> * Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20-11-2001 15:36]:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | Finally got around to updating it :
> |
> | http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/mutt.html
> |
> | Feedback ?
>
> Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser
* Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20-11-2001 15:36]:
| Hi,
|
| Finally got around to updating it :
|
| http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/mutt.html
|
| Feedback ?
Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser "links".
IMO, this is the best alternative for lynx. It s
On Fri, 02 Mar 2001, Erika Pacholleck wrote:
> ( Fre, 02 Mär 2001 ) tompoe <-- :
> >
> > So, if someone could describe briefly just what happens when I enter "y" to
> > send message?
>
> I do not use Suse and no sendmail but postfix, but its slightly equal,
> so flatly spoken:
> - mutt calls th
tompoe :
> So, if someone could describe briefly just what happens when I
> enter "y" to send message? I need to track the message,
mutt hands off to sendmail (which queues the mail). then when you connect
to your isp and give a /usr/sbin/sendmail -q then the mail is sent to your
isp smtp ser
Pete Robie proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> After a few hours of sitting here reading I found a temporary
> solution that can be done from a users end. The recipiant has no idea if
Tell you what - the best way to block spam - the most permanent way to block
spam - is to forward the spam,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:45:23PM +0900, Sam Alleman wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what this message is all about:
>
> ~~/tmp/mutt-xena-22566-0 [#1] modified. Update encoding? ([y]/n):
>
> What does this mean, and is there any way to bypass this question?
My guess is that mutt is telling you t
28 matches
Mail list logo
